Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 8973. (Read 26610459 times)

...And a new competitor enters the race there with raw posting an offering he describes as new and promising lol. Will he catch up with the real professionals like fillipponne with his cheeky same page repost from last night of raja news, or his not one but two reposts of V8 stock2flow related blablah over the past couple weeks, or indeed raja himself who has quietly built up a rep for himself as a master of this general game you, some of you, seem to like to play of not reading the thread, pretending it's a good thread and posting already discussed to death or decidedly uninteresting material in the vain hope of scoring a merit, looking clever, or being liked?

well I'll be d++++d. Would you mind not cussing in this august thread, people come here to post important T and F A, not see your unedited Tourette's spew

That's new and sounds promising..

How Bitcoin’s Lightning Can Be Used for Private Messaging




Argument

---

Damn you v8

Yes, that's an interesting irony.  Peter Schiff is and always has been, a well respected gold permabull cheerleader.  He will be seen to be correct now and again, but as far as he views BTC, it detracts from his main asset, and he will take every opportunity to talk the bear case.

Biases aside, that is a very bad long term chart (technically, having marked out a high  at 19500 , hard resistance at 13500 and then even more sharply at 10500 : 3 descending tops), as I said at the time. Any chartist worth their salt would be calling a long decline. If it was a stock, it would be a 'short to zero'.   

It is well established on this board that we ignore classic chart signals because BTC is 'different', but if Peter Schiff is to properly adhere to his own disciplines, he is consistent and correct.

I agree with your think BTCbitcoin bubble everyday increased BTCbitcoin system BTCbitcoin not only a coin it is a future diamond in the world.

OK, back to this.


The only reason you are correct here is because he was analyzing the wrong set of blocks, which you didn't know until right now. The fuckup happened in a block previous to 600,000 -- read below.


It is glaringly a dispositive. During the previous 10,000 block period there were exactly 6 penalty transactions totaling 0.09746883 BTC. It is less than 1/10th of 1 BTC -- not just "less than 1 BTC." A penalty transaction has distinct characteristics:


So far none of the 400 nodes connected to him reported receiving any funds. What is more likely is he has the funds, can't access them, and they are far fewer than 4 BTC in total.


There are LN experts working pretty hard to help this guy recover his funds.

https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/2468

It seems like this guy did everything wrong on purpose. Its hard to believe someone would crash through several safeguards so recklessly if he cared at all about his BTC. My bet is when his funds are restored it will surface that the total "lost" was far less than 4 BTC.

Remember that bitcoin has been accused, accused and accused of being in a bubble, too.

Historically bitcoin's bubble has evolved like this:




What a fantasy that you have.  You are an ugly fuck.

Guess this is Toddlers way after fork to more than 21mio?

 

Funny how much hopium is built into such a guy that has been pumping his bitcoin is going to zero nonsense since before I had even gotten into bitcoin.  He does say that he gets a decent amount of attention for his gold pumpening interactions with the bitcoin community.

Another funny thing is that he frequently says that he should have gotten into bitcoin at $10, when he first heard about it, while following up by saying that "now it is too late" blah blah blah.   He has been saying that a lot, and for some reason he seems to continue to fail/refuse to recognize the irony of such an ongoingly dumb statement.

Stop being ridiculous and an idiot.

Fact of the matter is that you are a whiner, and I am sorry that you are so god damned lamely emotional about ideas that are passed around on the interwebs, and you have to convert them into personal nonsense.   People do not attack me in real life, so why the fuck would I start experiencing it now, and you likely would not do it either, unless you are some kind of lame sociopath who cannot fit into normal interactions.

Would I call you a lame pussy in real life?  Probably not if I just met you, but if you kept whining on and on and on, like you do on the interwebs, most people would have to confront you in real life too about the need to grow some balls and to man ups, etc etc.


We are not in highschool dumb fuck.  


You are retarded, if you believe that is how the world works.  

By the way, my earlier comment that Micpeeps is referencing was a kind of joke, and seems like both you and him cannot recognize jokes or maybe neither of you understand what the fuck is up, and taking matters way too personally and way too seriously.  In other words, there should be no need for me to have to 'splain myself and/or to point out actual humor and lightheartedness of a joke, which makes the joke a bit less funny, after there is a need to attempt to explain it to someone who is taking a trivial matter as personal....
therefore, I have to include some laughs here, just so that we might get some humor out of this should have been unnecessary need for me to clarify dynamics of the interwebs.     ... but I feel like a psycho laughing here, so instead I will just have to roll my eyes, again.  


there now that I rolled my eyes, now I genuinely feel like laughing, and no longer feeling like a psycho for such conduct..        



Good point made by resident troll.   (Don't start believing that I like you.  You fucktwat).

Ok.  Thanks OROBTC for pointing out the post.  I found it.  Here is the link for easy future reference.

Usually it is better to provide the link to the post, rather than referring to its post number or its page number because post number and page number will change, and in this case, the post number has already changed to 507834, as I type, but if someone deletes some posts in front of that post, then its number will change again.


Ok.  No problem.  I had not read the article because I did not want to enter my e-mail, so I only saw the blurb that fillioppone seemingly had excerpted out of the article.



Sure, it can be informative to attempt to make historical comparisons, and maybe we also learn some history along the way, too.



I would phrase the proposition a bit differently, which is that Bitcoin is the only real and meaningful game in town.  All of the others are cheap and incomplete copycats, even when they are suggesting that they are doing something else or making some improvement to bitcoin, blah blah blah.

I largely agree that even if bitcoin is the best game in town, currently, we should not be such blind bitcoin maximalists as to either ignore everything else or to fail or refuse to hedge on some other coins or other projects in the event that something better might come along.  However, at the same time, there might be a decently large waste of brain power to be contemplating the possibility that something better might come to town when there is nothing meaningfully wrong with bitcoin that cannot be worked on etc etc.

Bitcoin is as about as perfect of a project as anyone could have imagined with incentives that are in place that cause motivations and incentives for peeps to build upon it.. to put efforts in place to freemarketly compete for it and within it... and for people to market it without getting paid and bitcoin not having any marketing team but not needing any marketing team because in the end a strong and scarce storage of value is likely going to gravitate value into it, whether we market it or not... or whether we work against it or not... Honey badger don't care.

Maybe you have heard about the theoretical suggestion that any coin to meaningfully compete against BTC and to truly take value from it in the long term (in terms of replacing it) should have something like a 10x improvement over BTC, so in other words, there may be some inferior technical aspects of bitcoin, but if the supposed improved technology that is meant to replace that inferior aspect of bitcoin is not at least 10x better, than they can fuck off or go kick rocks because no one is going to adopt that (at least no one smart and not in the long term), when the world already has bitcoin to do that function... one of the advantages of an incumbent that happens to have built in money that is built upon network effects, Schelling points and consensus.

🔄
 Binance 24 hour Trade Volumes:
🔶
 http://Binance.com: $1,276,526,045
🌐
 Binance DEX: $956,065
🇯🇪
Binance Jersey: $569,628
🔮
Binance Futures: $1,359,741,977
🇺🇸
Binance US: $7,932,133
💵
 Total: $2,645,725,849

Futures (BTC only) is bigger than Spot (all coins combined).


from source: https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1193035375087718402

Yes. It could have to do with the difference in our sitting positions. i like to lean back maybe 20-25°

Have you read the the manual and adjusted it?  My back doesn't come anywhere near the plastic edge at the top as the chair is slightly tipped backwards when I sit in it (and my spine is vertical).  I swear by them but they are uncomfortable out of the box - they have to be adjusted.

What f*****g to happen,
 how to possible  Bitcoin $0 after Christmas ?
i don't agree to this.

I haven't kept up much on chair technology, but it's very difficult finding a decent chair. The sub ~$120 are all cheap pieces of shit that break in 6 months. The expensive ones often have quirks that make them uncomfortable over long periods of time. But you know this all already.

The one I use at home is very similar to the one in your lower photo. I've had it for 3 years or so, and it's held up well.

At work, the company buys my chairs, so I've been getting expensive ones. 5 years ago, I bought a Steelcase Leap V2. It ended up giving me back problems. The same thing happened to two other people I know with the Leap. Recently, I replaced it with a Herman Miller Aeron. It's better, but overrated. The lumbar support does nothing, and the hard plastic edge at the top of the back forces me to hunch forward a bit. I'd rather have my cheap chair from home.

I wouldn't pay full price for these chairs even with my employer's money. I got them for relatively cheap at https://www.madisonseating.com/ They buy huge lots of used chairs from bankrupt companies and refurbish them.

I thought jb was using an upgraded jjg algorithm. 

Yes

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/dte7u2/a_gift_from_my_dearest_friend_that_i_received_on/

Why is nobody attempting to fool the goyim into buying cashless society slavery system tokens instead of physical metals??? Where is last of the four cylinders when you need him?  Oh, there he is.