Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9106. (Read 26717192 times)

Don't forget that you should be attempting to learn too... I mean really learning.. not just saying that you are learning.  

One of the first things that you should try to learn is how to NOT lose money.  That would be one of the best things to learn, especially in the beginning of your trading practices.

When I say learn how to NOT lose money, learn how to value your wealth in bitcoin, not dollars or whatever other crappy fiat that you might use.  Stack your bitcoin, and in the long term, you should be in profits - especially 3-5 years down the road as long as you continue to stack sats.

wait pereira you think the price would go or stay down if they made it illegal
i think it would go up up up whatever the stage in emission rate

https://twitter.com/Rhythmtrader/status/1190626870032846848

Someone had a valid question to ask.

All time love you brother regularly learn about  trading basically  day trading, maximum  profit going to my cycle repair,internet bill others profit invest Orphanage.
Every time trying to professional trader...!      

Holy fuck....  ~Money~  If you have been around Bitcoin since May 2013, and you still do not have one bitcoin, then you are likely to be fucked if we reach $100k, and if you currently do not have 1 BTC and you been around BTC for more than 6 years, I doubt that you are going to have 1BTC by the time that we reach $100k.  In other words, .... alright.. I won't say it... I am going to hold back the BIG meanie, at least temporarily.  

you mean we will be alive to see the 100k price
if that happens i will be happy to have one bitcoin too,

we all expect a jump in price if november monthly candle closes green
only then we can move to higher targets

And onto price predictions, the current 2 scenarios I consider are:

1) 100k by 2022
2) 100k by 2032

Scenario 2 would have a very long cryptowinter, giving you the opportunity to stack tons of cheap BTCs. This scenario completes an hyperwave hitting around 1k-ish as the lowest low before a new ATH. However things are leaning up towards scenario 1), which would mean 1MM by 2032, but also means you'll have less BTC in your pocket.

Scenario 2 would need to include global warfare against Bitcoin. Like governments going all-in against BTC, closing ALL exchanges, threatening with possession of BTC as illegal, closing all ongoing institutional brokerage activities, no Bakkt, CME, ETF, none of that, all is cancelled. Making mining illegal, having the POTUS shitting on BTC every so often on Twitter.. you get the idea. BTC would be really underground during this period. I don't rule this scenario out because things can change fast and governments can become increasingly tyrannical during hyperinflation times. This would mean really cheap coins for a long time. During this time demoralization would be high, so it would be possible to stack at low prices. Once reality hits in as halving go on, panic buying would kick in eventually, specially by 2032 when the emission rate becomes almost flat.

I don't understand why people are ruling out this scenario. We have never faced a full blown attack, and I think it's eventually coming, which would fit this long crypto winter period I describe. Sure, like I said scenario 1 looks like it's forming, but things can change fast, fundamentals are not shown on TA.

I maintain the Roman position that both actors and musicians are nothing more than circus clowns and buffoons that should not be respected.

In order to have a "rich lifestyle" you'll have to have your bitcoins taxed anyway, so it goes against your claim of "Good luck to them getting access to my coins."...

Suppose you have 100 BTC and price is $100k per coin, and you want to live a $10million lifestyle. You spend $1million on a nice condo and $100k on a car, you sell enough to make a decent yearly income from dividends, and so on... do you think the government will not ask where the money came from? because they will and they ask for origin of funds. What will you say and what data you have to back it up?

A lot of people live under the radar without flashy things because they couldn't prove the origin of their wealth (even if it's of licit origin, they didn't save the required documentation to prove so) and don't want to risk getting into a huge problem, so they are rich but still live a rather frugal lifestyle.

In order to bypass all of that with top accountants and lawyers I guess you would need a serious (9 figure or $billionaire) wealth, otherwise you can't pretend to be a big guy above laws.

That's very strange.

Well done.
Edited the message.

Remember when the goal was to get 21BTC, which surely would put any of those folks who had been able to HODL onto that amount as being in a very decent position at $100k per coin, and now there are a lot of meme-ing around the random 6.15BTC goal, which seems to rely on BTC going much higher than $100k per coin in order to really be comfortable.

I guess that part of my point is that amount of BTC goals are going down and down and down.  Of course, we have those who are either with a mediocre budget or are just getting in striving to get to 1BTC and more.  There have surely been some of those folks participating in this thread.  At some point, we are going to have peeps aspiring to get 1 million satoshis... or whatever other reasonable amount becomes our new deflationary goalpost point.

Stock to Flow my little cockr0ach, not Stack to Fail.
Anyway, H O D L

That is strange that they are getting excited about such small amounts.  I suppose that it can seem somewhat deceptive if an agent is asking you how much you are carrying, and you say $100 while you are carrying $9k, so that could raise some suspicions.

But the fact that the agents seem to want to add up the amounts in order to arrive at a number that seems higher and violative, but really are they going to be able to establish that the flight attendants were working together somehow, because otherwise the case should have to be considered on an individual by individual basis?

I guess a bothersome aspect remains that there can be all kinds of tricks to attempt to allege that innocent people are engaging in bad conduct in order to take their money (or valuables), and ultimately, even if these flight attendants were conspiring, the amount is still small fry to suggest that they are not properly declaring the value brought in (engaging in innocent arbitrage opportunities, not money laundering... money laundering just sounds so much worse than what could have been happening if they actually had been working together).

The value of Bitcoin is derived from how many people you can attempt to fool into adopting a confidence game scam because it's not a resource in itself just like every other currency that's ever existed, of which Bitcoin is a currency and not money.  Whereas the value of money as per the Aristotle definition is derived from being a physical commodity resource that doesn't rely on being a confidence game.  This is why all currencies start at a value of zero and always collapse and return there while money doesn't.  They're inherently scams.  Attempting to push currencies as opposed to money on others also makes YOU a scammer.

David ready to fight Goliath = Bitcoin ready to fight Fiat  

What are you trying to say, hairy mcbary?  Are you trying to say that we are largely "on track"?

The Value of Bitcoin With Daniel Krawisz = Usage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72aaQdssUaU&feature=youtu.be

BTW
anyone into metals knows Zinc is best investment