Coming down to $8k?
Still well above 10K,hopefully no more four digit figures again.Hold your hands together! 
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9579. (Read 26608476 times)
August 14, 2019, 12:35:14 PM
August 14, 2019, 12:28:08 PM
Coming down to $8k?
August 14, 2019, 12:10:02 PM
Congratulations Mic!
I miss those days when I used to have more merit than you. It was something like 600 vs. only 300, now it's 899 vs. 2448.
Three things I'm absolutely sure of:
1. My death.
2. Bitcoin reaching $100k in the next five years.
3. I'll NOT beat Mic in terms of merit ever again.
I miss those days when I used to have more merit than you. It was something like 600 vs. only 300, now it's 899 vs. 2448.
Three things I'm absolutely sure of:
1. My death.
2. Bitcoin reaching $100k in the next five years.
3. I'll NOT beat Mic in terms of merit ever again.
You will also arrive, you are one step away from being legendary.
Here is nothing free in this world.
Bull..... It's called an airdrop.
Almost everyone here has received free coins and tokens.
Dump 'em for BTC
FREE BTC!
I know, but I'm not interested, they ask for a lot of data, custionaries, participation in social networks.
August 14, 2019, 12:01:39 PM
Three things I'm absolutely sure of:
1. My death
2. Bitcoin reaching $100k in the next five years.
3. -
How can you be absolutely sure?1. My death
2. Bitcoin reaching $100k in the next five years.
3. -
I'm 80% sure, but anything could happen with Bitcoin, right?
Not really. Bitcoin has come a long way from where it began; there's no going back to the initial point anymore. Being 80% sure = not believing enough in bitcoin. Plus TBH, $100k looks quite close to me.
August 14, 2019, 11:56:59 AM
Three things I'm absolutely sure of:
1. My death
2. Bitcoin reaching $100k in the next five years.
3. -
How can you be absolutely sure?1. My death
2. Bitcoin reaching $100k in the next five years.
3. -
I'm 80% sure, but anything could happen with Bitcoin, right?
August 14, 2019, 11:50:24 AM
For fucks sake JJG. We discussed this yesterday. I asked you quite nicely not to quote Roach.
Ignored for a week for quoting Roach.
Ignored for a week for quoting Roach.
Even on Thursday?
And he is somewhat deluded into thinking that the possibility of a "blockapocallipse" is much higher than it really is...
You may wish to ponderate upon this trend line: https://www.blockchain.com/en/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=all
Nothing to worry just yet. Segwit and tx batching doing its job to increase capacity. And nothing a moderate (ie 2x) additional block size increase plus some LN adoption couldn't solve.
I never said we won't need SOME block size increase. Quite the contrary. But forking to go full retarded on 1GB blocks is... well... just retarded.
That being said, I understand your hedging. If you believe there is a significant chance for a "blockapocallipse" severely hitting Bitcoin in the near future then... well... maybe your putting (some) of your money when your beliefs are...
Even if that were the case, crypto (as a whole) would be severely (if not deadly) hurt.
Ouch... third dumping leg... probably time to BTFD.
Literally the only credible argument I have seen against a dynamic blocksize fork is getting consensus.
August 14, 2019, 11:46:03 AM
Here is nothing free in this world.
Bull..... It's called an airdrop.
Almost everyone here has received free coins and tokens.
Dump 'em for BTC
FREE BTC!
August 14, 2019, 11:40:37 AM
Gravity force shows its effects on price again. I still don't find reasons of recent drop. Are there any news released minutes ago?
Sellers more aggressive than buyers.Financial Markets are in disarray
Gold is healthy + 17 USD atm
1 BTC= 1 BTC
No reasons to worry.
August 14, 2019, 11:38:19 AM
Gravity force shows its effects on price again. I still don't find reasons of recent drop. Are there any news released minutes ago?
August 14, 2019, 11:26:44 AM
Congratulations Mic!
I miss those days when I used to have more merit than you. It was something like 600 vs. only 300, now it's 899 vs. 2448.
Three things I'm absolutely sure of:
1. My death.
2. Bitcoin reaching $100k in the next five years.
3. I'll NOT beat Mic in terms of merit ever again.
I miss those days when I used to have more merit than you. It was something like 600 vs. only 300, now it's 899 vs. 2448.
Three things I'm absolutely sure of:
1. My death.
2. Bitcoin reaching $100k in the next five years.
3. I'll NOT beat Mic in terms of merit ever again.
August 14, 2019, 11:23:09 AM
August 14, 2019, 11:13:05 AM
That's cool, I guess.
This bit puzzled me however:
Quote
The support, however, is limited to six devices - Galaxy S10e, S10, S10+, S10 5G, Note10, and the Note10+, and is restricted to seven countries - Canada, Germany, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, the U.S., and the U.K.
What - if you replace your phone or move elsewhere, All Your Corn Are Belong To Samsung?
August 14, 2019, 10:52:40 AM
And he is somewhat deluded into thinking that the possibility of a "blockapocallipse" is much higher than it really is...
You may wish to ponderate upon this trend line: https://www.blockchain.com/en/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=all
Has nothing to do with a "blockalypse" because the blockalyse never happened.
Blocks became full, Dominance plummeted. If you don't like the name Blockalypse I for this sorry state of affairs, then good for you. Stick your metaphorical fingers in your ears or bury your metaphorical head in the ground - your choice. For my part, I find it an apt and fitting description.
Quote
It simply means blocks are becoming increasingly full.
Exactly. And when they become persistently full once again?
Blockalypse II. Where the masses again abandon BTC for some other chain that actually allows one to quickly and inexpensively transfer value.
August 14, 2019, 10:46:07 AM
I already responded both that your facts are not correct and also,
So you're asserting that the charts I posted links to contain fraudulent figures? Interesting. I don't believe your assertion is correct, so I will tentatively conclude that you are delusional on these additional matters of fact.
I'll be happy to rescind my conclusion of delusional, just as soon as you post links to credible evidence of corrected data.
... and even if you might be using some actual facts ... emphasizing facts (if true) in your favor
I know that at one time, in about late 2017, you and your buddy, PeterR were advocating 50/50 or some baloney like that
Nope. You misrememberate. I think Peter suggested just not divesting your other Bitcoins. For my part, I have divulged several times that I have several times the number of BCH, and of BSV, than I do of BTC, though the dollar value of my BTC exceeds the rest of my holdings. And no, I do not feel stupid about it. I fully expect total vindication upon the onset of Blockalypse II. Even if not, I am doing just fine, thankyouverymuch.
<<... deflection continues ...>>
Lest we forget which facts JJG asserted are incorrect:
Quote
From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage
The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html
The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more precisely, Blockalypse I.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage
The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html
The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more precisely, Blockalypse I.
OK, actually only the first two were facts. The last paragraph was merely a rational conclusion based upon those preceding facts.
Who gives any shits about your attempts to describe bitcoin as broken with a bunch of made up bullshit,
See, this is the salient point, JuniorJiggly: I am posting facts with links to supporting evidence, and you keep characterizing them as 'a bunch of made up bullshit'. You are being Deceitful, Dishonest, and Dissembling.
August 14, 2019, 10:42:02 AM
Congratulations Mic, well earned...and welcome !
August 14, 2019, 10:39:26 AM
I already responded both that your facts are not correct and also,
So you're asserting that the charts I posted links to contain fraudulent figures? Interesting. I don't believe your assertion is correct, so I will tentatively conclude that you are delusional on these additional matters of fact.
I'll be happy to rescind my conclusion of delusional, just as soon as you post links to credible evidence of corrected data.
... and even if you might be using some actual facts ... emphasizing facts (if true) in your favor
I know that at one time, in about late 2017, you and your buddy, PeterR were advocating 50/50 or some baloney like that
Nope. You misrememberate. I think Peter suggested just not divesting your other Bitcoins. For my part, I have divulged several times that I have several times the number of BCH, and of BSV, than I do of BTC, though the dollar value of my BTC exceeds the rest of my holdings. And no, I do not feel stupid about it. I fully expect total vindication upon the onset of Blockalypse II. Even if not, I am doing just fine, thankyouverymuch.
<<... deflection continues ...>>
Lest we forget which facts JJG asserted are incorrect:
Quote
From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage
The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html
The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more precisely, Blockalypse I.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage
The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html
The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more precisely, Blockalypse I.
OK, actually only the first two were facts. The last paragraph was merely a rational conclusion based upon those preceding facts.
My dear bear, correlation does not equal causation
No argument there. However, correlation does form the basis of a rational causation hypothesis.
OTOH, your example was noncorrelation. Which is quite a bit further from equaling causation (i.e., in direct opposition from) than is correlation.
Quote
A crypto bull market will shrink Bitcoin market dominance
Speculation based upon facts not yet entered into evidence.
August 14, 2019, 10:38:25 AM
I’ve been trying to get to 1000 (earned) Merit’s for a long time too & today I finally achieved it. I know you have lots more but it took me ages to get to 1000 earned (2000).
Congrats once again brother.
Whoa! Totally missed that mate!
Great achievement.
Not that you were in need to demonstrate anything (not your fault if you were already here when merits airdropped!) but getting 1000 merits means you kept up with the good work!
August 14, 2019, 10:33:17 AM
Probably the author (and VB001) wanted to troll us.
Exactly, I am a troll disguised as WO.
Congrats, Mic, special celebration tonight...
WO Gang,
brace yourself.
Wall of food pics are coming.
Hopefully, only food and drink pics...
August 14, 2019, 10:26:37 AM
we are around the midpoint of the last series of green candles starting about 2 weeks ago
so it's about time to start going up.
Will we reach 15000 within the next 2 months?
so it's about time to start going up.
Will we reach 15000 within the next 2 months?
August 14, 2019, 10:23:42 AM
Oh, I was hoping to see more urine.
Exactly, I am a troll disguised as WO.
Congrats, Mic, special celebration tonight...
WO Gang,
brace yourself.
Wall of food pics are coming.
Hopefully, only food and drink pics...
Probably the author (and VB001) wanted to troll us.
Exactly, I am a troll disguised as WO.
Congrats, Mic, special celebration tonight...
WO Gang,
brace yourself.
Wall of food pics are coming.
Hopefully, only food and drink pics...
Jump to: