Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9604. (Read 26608143 times)

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
Who's ready for the weekend pump?!

 Grin
sr. member
Activity: 1197
Merit: 482
And this is why most people ignore you when you mention bitcoin, fly by night outfits like this do not serve bitcoin evangelism very well...
https://cointelegraph.com/news/texas-securities-watchdog-shuts-down-craigslist-crypto-scammer
full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 126
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!

Huh?  So you are trying to say altcoins have all the growth potential and Bitcoin is headed for an early grave? 
Nah! You don't get it right!

Bitcoin is going to crush the altcoin soon only the ashes will be left in future.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 17063
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
69.9 on CMC


i will empty the other half of this great bottle of rum if we hit 70% tonight.

I am going to buy some corn to get the dominance there so you won’t feel guilty when emptying that bottle.
You can thank me later.
Now I am going to buy that 0.1% world bitcoin...
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
69.9 on CMC


i will empty the other half of this great bottle of rum if we hit 70% tonight.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.

BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities.  And it seems it lasted for two whole years.

There was an explosion of ICOs at that time. The BCH fork wasn’t a driver.

From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage

The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html

The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more pecisely, Blockalypse I.

why did i know you couldn´t resist to post here... ?   full blocks are ok. fee market is ok. shitcoins are not ok. and bch/bsv... oh dear... i guess they solved the full blocks problem. a blockchain no fucker is using will not have full blocks...
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510

Huh?  So you are trying to say altcoins have all the growth potential and Bitcoin is headed for an early grave? 

i am a mountainbiker. bitcoin and shitcoins are NOT on the same bike. eventhough i like the idea of this meme, while btc might as well be on a bike, alts are ants trying to cross a 1 mile wide scotch tape.

My point is there is a lot of ways to take that image and many of them aren't positive for Bitcoin.   
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
Buy bitcoin

The Japanese rendition of the story how a single man defeated an army of digital shitcoin scammers and became the richest man in the world with physical silver:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rUb5dLO7-I

Well silver has turned out to be a pretty crappy investment.   When adjusted for inflation it is worth less now than its value 50 years ago.   Way less.   Not a hedge at all.   (Silver is about 1/8th the value now as it was in 1979)
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106

Huh?  So you are trying to say altcoins have all the growth potential and Bitcoin is headed for an early grave? 

i am a mountainbiker. bitcoin and shitcoins are NOT on the same bike. eventhough i like the idea of this meme, while btc might as well be on a bike, alts are ants trying to cross a 1 mile wide scotch tape.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.

BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities.  And it seems it lasted for two whole years.

There was an explosion of ICOs at that time. The BCH fork wasn’t a driver.

From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage

The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html

The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more pecisely, Blockalypse I.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510

Huh?  So you are trying to say altcoins have all the growth potential and Bitcoin is headed for an early grave? 
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.

BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities.  And it seems it lasted for two whole years.

There was an explosion of ICOs at that time. The BCH fork wasn’t a driver.
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1288
reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.

BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities.  And it seems it lasted for two whole years.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
I want see that fucking eth below %3 dominance. That shitcoin needs to die. Send it back to $9 and I will be happy. It is One of those shitcoins I'll never invest, even for gambling purposes. (The other is bcash)
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
altcoin bagholders are getting rekt royally.

reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts. alts get killed despite it is the only thing the majority of shitty exchanges make money with. (check coinbase). i am sure they are trying desperately to keep their business model alive.

since it is not retail investors who are fueling the btc uptrend the last couple of months (check google trends for "buy bitcoin")

it may just be shitcoiners that finally got a clue.

70% may not sound like overwhelming defeat but look at this:


bitcoin: 68.8
ETH: 7.75
XRP: 4.33
Bcash: 1.93
LTC: 1.86
Monero: 0.52

those are the top six. that is total defeat.

Personally, I am not going to write those shitcoins off from pumpening again, even though they are currently in considerable negative territory, relative to bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
Let's be real, altcoin investing can be profitable.

Just no need to be greedy.

as long as it is an altcoin WITH an use-case. i dont think they exist.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
I know you'll hate me for this but is this the right time to get some shitcoins?  Grin Maybe with the 0.5% of the crypto portfolio? It can surely go down a lot more but what if It goes up?  Grin

XMR and LTC looks so cheap. Especially LTC. Shiet it is 0.007. I dumped mine at somewhere around 0.016 or 0.018 Wew! Feelsgood man. I can get back more than double of what I sold now but not sure If i really want them.

There will be a price point, it will become so cheap, some people won't be able to resist, no matter how pointless and shitty these alts are. It is all part of the speculation.

Maybe It is better to wait for the BTC ATH before making that decision and only then invest %1-3 in shitcoins.

*No need to mention: the aim is to get more bitcoins without getting bamboozled by the altcoin hodlers.
** I have that fuckface on ignore and I never ever read the post that quoted him. I advise you to do the same.

I doubt that this is anywhere near the proper place to be discussing relative pump-worthy-ability of various shit coins, even if you have some commonly held goals to acquire more bitcoins.  I understand that you value the opinions of bitcoin maximalists rather than the sea of shitcoin pumpers out there in the broader forum landia, yet nonetheless, it seems to be quite a slippery-slope to be comparing the level of shit or not shit of the various altcoins out there.. even if you seem to be asserting that LTC and Monero are less shitty than some others, such as ETH and bcash.. and even if I kind of agree with that general assertion, its still a BIG ASS slippery slope to go down that road, and encourages shills and trolls in these here parts.

Let's be real, altcoin investing can be profitable.

Just no need to be greedy.

We can be "real" in the sense that you might be able to make more bitcoin by engaging in such gamblings, yet also recognize that shitcoins are off topic here for a reason, and part of the reason is that it is a BIG fucking slippery slope... even if you either think that you could manage such limited off-topicness or you might even have decent and commonly held intentions to other bitcoin maximalists herein.... I think that our intentions to keep this thread out of shitcoin fuckery for as much as possible is a greater good than the possibility that you, or anyone else, might make some money on strategically playing some bullshit coins, even if some of those bullshit coins have some moral, ethical or technical redeeming values or even pumpability.

Edited above: Fixed the quotes that I had screwed up, and clarified some of the readability of the ideas presented therein.   Wink
Jump to: