Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9626. (Read 26607462 times)

Surely, you, roach, are not judged by your peers here, to be anything close to a piece of shit.  

Accordingly, based on that kind of an underlying presumption, you would be in real good bird's eye position to be able to verify for the rest of us with exact precision what is or is NOT a "piece of shit."  

Thanks again, Roach.  

I am starting to feel a bit warm and cuddly regarding your abilities to be able to provide both topical and helpful information in these here wall observing parts.

It's amazing how virtually everyone that's a lawyer is a piece of shit.  From Obama to Nick Szabo.  Since Ethereum imploded and became a joke, Szabo has cut back on his Eth shilling and a random newb poster might not know about it, but in the early days of Ethereum he was hardcore shilling for it, probably in order to try and profit by defrauding people with something he likely already knew was garbage.  This is why anyone should be insanely skeptical of anything else he says and demonstrates why all of his economic explanations are also garbage.

Thanks good ole buddy, roach.

That's why "we"  (that is the royal we) appreciate you so muchie, here.

You, roach, have this uncanny ability to suss out the shitcoiners from the true bitcoiners in order that we can stay more focused on real bitcoin maximalism in these here parts.  

Thanks again, good ole buddy, roach.    You're the greatest!!!


"We" owe you one.

You know that some people have the idea of fish messed up in their heads, too.  They consider fish to be a non-meat, even though most of us normies would consider fish to be kind of meat that merely differs from other meats in certain kinds of ways. Of course, shell fish and fish that feed lower on the food chain such as sardines and anchovies, but perhaps this Jesus case would be referring to more traditional full bodied fishies that fit in a vertebrates category?   

Nick Szabo is one of the #1 scammers in digital shitcoins.  He shills for Ethereum for fuck's sake.  And all of his economic interpretations are either wrong or flat out lies.  He doesn't even seem to comprehend the difference in money vs currency, or just flat out omits the two words in order to lie to his audience because they would realize all currencies (like cryptocurrency) are Keynesian scams based on artificial scarcity.  To be money it's required to be a non-perishable, physical commodity (I.E. not an imaginary, Keynesian widget based on artificial scarcity like US dollars, Bitcoins, or Dogecoins).  Aristotle knew this thousands of years ago and fly by night scammer Nick Szabo is no Aristotle.

There were originally reports of multiple shooters at different areas of the walmart/mall.

False flag shooting confirmed.  Time for a Nuremberg trial for everyone in the FBI, CIA, CFR, Mossad, homeland security, the media, and congress involved.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/police-warn-of-an-active-shooter-at-an-el-paso-texas-mall

 Hey!  You might be onto something here.  I've never seen a vegetarian fish substitute.  Searching...

I am not familiar with such Jesus story.  Were they real fish, impossible fish or beyond fish (which would be a variant of impossible fish)?

 Sadly, they gave Jesus fish.

O.k...   I don't necessarily disagree with you that BTC is not an actual person, but you realize that whale manipulators are going to attempt to push the BTC price as long and as hard as they are able to in order to cause a decent amount of pain on people and so if you are on the wrong side of a trade, then these people, who are whales, might be stacked against you.  You realize that, right?

Or maybe you think that you are on the right side of a trade and you have the price movement figured out?  You have had an opportunity for buying back after a 35% BTC price drop, but still you did not even buy back any because you believe that the drop needs to be more?  The more of you that stack up expecting for more price drop the more that some of the whale manipulators are going to consider it easier to push the BTC price up, rather than down.

I am not saying that for sure you are not right, but I am suggesting that there are moderate approaches that might not make as much money but they do not lose as much either in the event that the price moves against you.

You also realize that ever since BTC prices broke above $4,200  on April 1, there have been a lot of DOWN betters doubling down with expectations that the price would go down and several of them are still likely hanging out, like you, just ripe for the slaughter with some continued upwards price movement.  Surely I don't really know, but surely I do not gamble like you seem to be doing, either, so hopefully, in the end, you are prepared for BTC price movements in either direction, because it is far from obvious that more BTC price correction is needed at this particular time in order for the BTC price to resume upwards.

If BTC stays $11k through May 2020, then you are not cashing out any BTC, or you are planning to cash out some BTC between now and May 2020, but you have to cash out fewer BTC as long as the BTC price stays higher?

You should not diversify for the mere sake of diversification, should you?

Don't get me wrong, I believe in some diversification, but you don't want to diversify into shit, and it is not necessarily good to diversify into assets that are likely to be highly correlated, either.


Can cause a motivation for achieving a kind of passive income status; however, like you suggest, if they do not quite realize how much their jobs are "stressing them out," then they could be causing irreversible if they do not identify the problem early enough.

Ok.  without necessarily getting stuck on Vod, exactly, maybe we could concede that a decent amount of bitcoin equals very very wealthy.... and perhaps in the 2015 time frame there were some folks who were in the multiple of thousands of bitcoin that were considered to be very very wealthy from bitcoin, so maybe more recently we have considered in the about supra 500 BTC to be in the very very wealthy category.

Seems like in the near future we will be able to widdle that down a bit to the supra 200BTC and the supra 100BTC, which maybe we have to get into the $30k to $50k arena before those levels of BTC stash are going to start to be considered very very wealthy from BTC.
Maybe once we get above $100k, assuming that we do, then it will be reasonable to start to categorize upper double digit BTCers as very very wealthy from BTC...

Just a matter of time... just a matter of time, and more and more HODLers going to be considered very very wealthy from BTC.

Many of us have probably heard the speculation that we are in the midst of witnessing the early stages of one of the greatest transfers of wealth in modern history.. and the category of transfer is from no coiners who had had traditional wealth to coiners who had not had traditional wealth.  There are going to  be some coiners with traditional wealth who are able to hang onto their wealth and to increase their wealth, too.... but I suspect that many of us kind of understand the principle, even though we have some reservations regarding whether it will actually occur, how much it will occur and how long it will take to occur. 

Coiners rejoice.

Yeah there are certainly going to be degrees of coiners, just like there are some really BIG coiner players who have in the 5digit quantities of coins who had really reached a decent stride in wealth during the 2013 price rises.  Surely the newer newly rich have been reached in the 4 digits and kind of already reached into the upper 3 digits.  Little by little reaching into the lower 3 digits, and we are hoping to reach into the 2 digits. 

Nonetheless, any level of bitcoin  should be putting folks ahead, even if they are not exactly in the very very wealthy from their bitcoin, yet.. and even if they are not going to be able to achieve some of the higher levels, they should just be attempting to achieve whatever level is reachable by them, even if it is only single digits and even if there are some struggles to reach 1 bitcoin.. .   

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/cm9wrl/5_billion_zimbabwe_dollar_bill_this_is_the_best/

 
Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency not a person or organization,  do you think the traders like to punish people or make profits?   The seller walls and buyer walls you are just a nobody.

Yep, did the same on 1/14/18. Thought the Altcoins would tide me over for 2 years and 5 months till full 66 years and 2 months soc security and traditional investments.

oops. burned thru altcions in 2018 to stay at my 'lovely' 3.2k a month lifestyle.

working 3.2k month ave say pay lifestyle

retired on crypto 3.2k a month ave on pay lifestyle

just poked the bear and living on traditional investments before they pop downward in what I expect is a recession (20% downturn = recession, I expect 40% or so)

you guessed it 3.2k a month lifestyle as set up in the 'old guy' safe/maintain stock adjustment to keep same with traditional investments

So, even if crypto did go full tulips, it allowed me to retire 3 years early more or less.

BTC stays above 11,000 USD in some manner thru halving and I'm golden. That is just plain HODL 'gravy'

(be boring, live modestly, have no debt, drive a rusty car, etc)

Living the life, of 'dubious' old fart, under the radar, planning. snicker

Not betting on it, I don't make predictions, but that's where the resistance is. My philosophy is always to treat future prices/events as a probability range. I always take note of other opinions.

The 14k overhead would normally take a lot of work to break through. In the event it happens quickly, that's an extra-bullish sign.

Yes, you're right 5 months is a long time in the markets especially BTC.

I think it is very brave to bet on $14k holding until 2020.  Five months is a hell of a long time in Bitcoin.

IMV 14k is the real key resistance. Fair chance that will hold into 2020. The reason is because the exponential spike failed just below 14k, and these runs always create hard overhead resistance. The flipside to that is, if 14k is decisively broken soon, it shows there is a lot of relative strength....and 20k is next stop.