Take it to the bank, ATHs are a thing of the past for bitcoin. The clear downtrend continues.
aww look
the sadness.
Not gonna be meriting you now am i, a true bitcoin fervorist as you are. The guy that remainded bullish from 20k to 3.2k.
Yeah.,. fuck Kingcolex.
He probably kept buying BTC all the way down from $20k to $3.2k, and now he is one of those shithead traitor (traders) who currently happens to be in profits, even if he had started buying BTC at the top and kept buying all the way down.
Fuck that.
Would not want to be in profits, especially at this price point. Better to be a no coiner than to be like Kingcolex.
hahahahahaha
sucks to be you, jonoiv... selling all of your mediocre .5BTC stash at $6k and now waiting to buy back, and maybe only being able to get .25BTC by using the same amount that you sold.
yep that's right i have less than a quarter of a coin, maybe now ill get a few less hacking attempts on my accounts.
I will grant you that holding bitcoin does require some new learning in terms of guarding your various security mechanisms, and there have been a number of demonstrations that even the hardware wallets are more difficult to secure, if an attacker gets physical access to the device.
So, yeah, we gotta be careful out there if we are a BTC HODLer. Accordingly, that could be an additional reason to diversify a bit more, upon profits, but it should not be a justification not to invest in mechanisms that allow profits.
Some people had also complained that if they were to realize profits then they would also have to pay taxes, but that seems like a lame excuse, too. I mean, if I would have bought 10 bitcoins at $1k, so my total investment would have been $10k, and then I decide to cash out half of those bitcoins at $10k, then my profits on those 5 btc would be $45,000 (5 BTC x 10$k = $50k - $5k initial investment cost). So if I pay capital gains tax, then my capital gains tax would be $6,750 ($45k x 15%), so my profits on that portion would still be $38,250 ($5k-$6,750). Sure it is frustrating paying taxes, but it would be better to pay them than to suffer consequences of not paying... same with security, the more value that we have in our coins, then the more security measure that should be taken to protect them.
Not really into flexing my crypto penis or organising prostitue parties like some of the WO thread regulars.
Attending such $100k party would be optional for anyone invited, and surely if you were organizing such a party, then that would be optional too, but could ensure with higher certainty that you would be invited. Prostitutes are optional too, for those who have money, but would not be optional if you don't have money. So, seems like having more money should give more options rather than fewer options. You are kind of making my case for me, jonoiv. I am not sure if I should thank you for that.
By the way, I thought that you did not have any BTC, but if you have .25BTC then at least you have a micro-crypto-penis rather than no crypto penis at all. So you gotta have at least some crypto penis in order to be able to flex it. amiNOTrite?
I just like to come here to remind you that it's on the way to the phase C bottom. Don't really care how many of you religous freaks gang up on me, ill trade as I see fit not be dupped into buying at this obviously troubling tme for the permabulls.
You come in here hoping that perhaps some day you might be right, and perhaps when BTC surpasses $100k and doubles from there, and we get our evil correction down to $30k or lower, then at that point, you can say that you were right (technically or in spirit.). You can actually say anything that you want, and perhaps some of us will be busy banging hos, donuting in our lambos and snorting blow. But, yeah, I suppose that you have something to look forward to.... becoming more and more bitter while waiting to be right.