(edited for oneness, other post deleted)
"ill suited to ordinary consumers"
translation; profits like these are only for the elites
Don't you have fields to plow peasant? Tax time is coming up.
While I would agree at heart, consider say aunt bertha scammed into unbearable risk by her broker, who actually didn't bother to explain and maybe used that as a hedge.
I'm no ordinary consumer, though. I knew about shit when the 'elites' hadn't even heard of what we may call the underlying. If admission to the club is a fair process, with my mind I would agree for the sake of auntie.
In all fairness, try being the poor sucker journalist that has to write sensibly about Arsenal’s latest match, the Spratly islands, methamphetamine addiction in Bromley, the new All-New Ford Kuga, whisky tasting and Bitcoin. And then be judged by experts in each area.
Shit is hard yo.
Actually, the piece itself was good enough to make me ask a specific question expecting a detailed reply - namely, what is meant by "general public". We aren't all Bertha.
Besides, titles are usually not the writer's fault.