Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 999. (Read 26711453 times)

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Like I said in my earlier posts, such liquidation will cause deeper correction(the reason I referred to it as turbulence) than the previous liquidation but it is not the time to panic because bitcoin have got the necessary fundamental that will lead to quick recovery just like we are witnessing now. It does not make sense to see a prolonged dump when bitcoin halving is around the corner.

One thing that is certain is that traders will do what they are good at doing, they are loyal to one thing which is the profit. So, often we will experience huge liquidation and that is how the market movement of impulse and correction is maintained.

Just be aware that selling around ATH is historically a very risky strategy. But also, depends on your exposure how much your selling etc. If you're 100% invested, then sure, you could be overexposed here, even if price were to go to the upside, you wouldn't be "losing" much by holding 90%. Especially if you'd feel more comfortable having some dry powder for a potential correction.

Often I think it's less about whether price is more likely to go up or down, but what you feel more comfortable with, or which scenario you'd prefer to be. Ie, would you prefer to have 10% capital for a potential correction, or prefer to be 100% in rather than 90% if there were further upside? That's the real question here. To me that'd be a no brainier, as I'm not as greedy as I used to be, but everyone is different.


Not sure if you were asking me, but at present I'd say 50/50 further upside. With $60K breaking I'd be 60/40 for further downside. With $69K breaking to the upside I'd say 60/40 further upside. Not massively swaying in either direction here and from a trading perspective this is very much in a "no trade zone" when inbetween support and resistance. Hence emphasis on too early tell. But also if you're not willing to sell below $60K (for obvious reasons), then you'd have to make a decision before then. Not gonna lie, some of the best analysts are suggesting that the cycle is over now with ETFs entering the space, which while I generally agree with, I don't believe it will be fully realised until GBTC selling is resolved. Either that, of net inflows returns to positive again, which again above $69K would be quite likely I think.

As for the idea that ETF investors will jump ship if price corrected in half, I think the opposite is true. They got in knowing price could correct 50% or further, and are instead much more likely to double down at a considerable discount, after some consolidation and price stability (ie not buying the dip per say), compared to retail who are known for panic selling. I don't think they are naive or going to be quick sellers, but instead they will happily sit back and let prices fall until strength returns to the market, as they have done this week, as is the norm for ETF investing, in order to buy strength not weakness. I think JJG might even agree with me to some degree on this point that ETF investors are more likely to be strong hands, that I'm slowly but surely coming round to, especially given the lack of selling over the recent correction. Even if this doesn't change the situation with GBTC outflows at present.

Obviously this is speculation that ETF holders will be strong hands, as is that they will be weak hands, when neither can be proven yet. But that's all we have to go on for now: speculation.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

...but what do you REALLY think? Surely, it could go up or down, as always.
What's the probabilities, as @JJG likes to post from time to time?
If bitcoin is 37K by August, all ETF holders will be out of it and ETF "project" crashes and burns.
ETF investors are not accustomed to more than 50% haircuts in a few months.
They will be out and stay out.

Thanks! Since I have no clue about trading and reading charts, this is helpful. What I have a clue about (or experience in) are the fake rallies after some “good news” whales use to create fomo. And that Jerome Powell news from yesterday was the perfect reason for whales to create another fake pump just do dump very hard later. They did this so many times that I’m so sick of this strategy. But of course there is always the chance that “this time it’s different”. Well I missed to sell at 67-68k. Now I won’t sell at 65-66k. Either I wait for another small pump or I take my coins off Binance and go into hodl mode again.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

His strategy about bitcoin is working because he is a strong believer in investing in assets with scarcity and high demand. Bitcoin stands out as one of such assets due to its capped supply of 21 million coins, making it highly scarce. Saylor has already predicted the continued growth, projecting a 200% annual increase over the next decade and he is putting his money where his mouth is.

Between Mar 11 to 18, 2014 Microstrategy has bought 9200 bitcoin for 620 million USD and with that purchase they now have 1% of all bitcoins. 600 Million USD capital was raised via a private offering of 0.875% convertible senior notes due in 2031.  Microstrategy now have 214,246 bitcoins with average price of $35,160 - still very much in profit [1].

Look at stock price of Microstrategy for last one month. It has gone up from 687 USD to 1690 USD in less then a month. A straight gain of 1000 USD.  

The point is Saylor strategy about Bitcoin is working.


Image Source

[1] https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/michael-saylors-microstrategy-9245-btc-620-million

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

@MDBitcoin
At least $1 trillion USD will enter #Bitcoin  through the ETFs.

This is a reasonable estimation that will occur over time.

The Bitcoin ETFs are still not priced in.

Let's say it enters in $100 billion increments.

And after each $100 billion, the price will need to adjust accordingly to sellers and new supply,

Let's assume it stabilizes at a price of $80k after this first 100b increment,

Starting Price: $80k
After 1st Increment: $119k
After 2nd Increment: $154k
After 3rd Increment: $191k
After 4th Increment: $228k
After 5th Increment: $265k
After 6th Increment: $302k
After 7th Increment: $339k
After 8th Increment: $376k
After 9th Increment: $413k
After 10th Increment: $450k

This is only through ETFs, not counting market dynamics, just a simple thought experiment of the potential of a single 1T entering the ETFs, which is extremely conservative.
https://x.com/mdbitcoin/status/1770751958548156688

It may be a stupid question, but considering what happened with the liquidation of long positions and futures options a few days ago (about $1.5 billion), what impact will the liquidation of almost $10 billion have on the price? Can we assume that another correction is inevitable, especially if ETFs inflows are at the levels we have had in the last few days?

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Yes, but you can take my opinion with a dose of salt as I've been sceptical about this rally since $48K  

According to Pi Cycle Top, as discussed elsewhere, $70K is either the mid-cycle top (like in 2019, 2016 and 2012), prior to a correction and consolidation, or this is the late-stage top, ie start of full blown bull market, like in 2020, 2017 and 2013. Based on time, I see this as a mid-stage not a late-stage top, especially given this indicator has "factored in" a new ATH being at this mid-stage top, and has previously been the most accurate at identifying these types of tops. This would otherwise be the first time there has been no "mid-stage correction" in Bitcoin's history, so while possible, the argument is that "this time it's different" - which is a fair argument given the introduction of ETFs and new ATH already. But only time will tell whether this is actually true or not, with the recent break of ATH not being enough to justify that speculative opinion as of yet.

More than anything I think ETFs are following the price, not leading it. There has been net inflows on the way up and net outflows on the way down generally speaking, even if they are helping to drive the price in both directions. All it will take is for GBTC to offload the rest of their coins, which may only take a couple of months from here, but until then and seeing net outflows, there remains selling pressure.

Based on price alone, either $69K breaks to the upside and price rallies further, or otherwise $60K breaks to the downside, leaving a pretty sizeable volume gap down to $52K at best, but more realistically $42K to $44K (which would still be a macro higher low). Also within a couple of months the 50 Week MA will be around these prices too, so bullish continuation could start from there quite easily. Based on 200 WMA projection, it should be around $37K by August (that was also a consolidation level) and would be a full -50% haircut, which is about as low as I see price going for now, if the correction lasted 4 months.

I'm otherwise overlooking the shorter-term TA on 4hr, as while price is currently confirming resistance around $68K (bearish trending 50 MA and ichimoku cloud at volume point of control), this could all still be broken with ease after another re-test of the 200 MA that previously supported the price perfectly (as expected in strong uptrends) and is currently around $62K. Too early to tell comes to mind here.

The rest of the ETFs would be pleased to wait until Sellbert drops his coins for them to buy at a cheaper price.
IF ETFs are dominating the price right now, regardless the outflow of GS, the volume would be sucked up to about re-establish the pre-GBTC-sell price shortly later on. I am thinking in ETF net flow, makes more sense, imo.

FOMO

I spent all my money already, but at half these prices :p

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Full send 🚀



Jelle
@CryptoJelleNL
In the past 9 years, BTC has generated the bulk of its returns in overbought conditions.

A high RSI isn't bearish. In fact, it's bullish.

Send it higher.

https://x.com/cryptojellenl/status/1770811907210895785

Who knows...

The ETFs in and out flows appear to be controlling the price quite a bit at the moment from what I can see. We are dipping again, now that GBTC has sold another 3000 BTC via Coinbase.

I am totally not obsessed with GrayScale, regardless of what some people may think. I've even explained in one post that I think it's just another single hump in the road like SO MANY distractions we are constantly faced with, when speculating about the price and the reason for its movements.

But absolutely, I think when GrayScale outflow stops (which will happen soon) and the halving has happened, I think the sky is the limit to BTC's price in fiat currencies.
We will definitely see a 100K+ BTC in 2024 and latest in 2025 I would have thought.

The time frame will always be the uncertainty.

Now that self custody is no longer a concern for perhaps many potential BTC buyers in the future, who may have been apprehensive in the past, certainly for institutions, with the multiple ETFs existing, I wouldn't be too sure about revisiting sub 50K BTC prices ever again.

The Fed talked about 3 rate cuts + political changes with the US / UK elections in the autumn could bring more bullish price action, or not. etc.