Another anonymous warrior. Well, I don't blame ya I suppose, that's fair enough.
I trust Carra though, I don't think he'd have any reason to have alts. He's a pretty stand-up guy and I'm fairly sure he gets a decent enough revenue from managing signature campaigns that he wouldn't want to risk that for...this...?
I trust Carra though, I don't think he'd have any reason to have alts. He's a pretty stand-up guy and I'm fairly sure he gets a decent enough revenue from managing signature campaigns that he wouldn't want to risk that for...this...?
No offence to you but this kind of thing is not an excuse IMHO. Scammers* can easily exploit this. This is the same reason I saw in ndhnc's thread for giving him a benefit of doubt, in fact, telling it was framing. I still couldn't come to a conclusion about ndnhc but I maybe able to draw a conclusion if he can prove that address is from a shared wallet which he couldn't do so far.
* Not saying Carra and ndnhc are scammers.
The forum has enough finger pointing for this month. Give this a rest please. OP gives proof of a few forum accounts who uses cryptsy addresses. The link of these accounts to carra23 is weak. There must be many other members using exchange addresses for sig campaigns, then all of them must belong to carra23?
The link is in their email addresses. All of the emails match the handles of their bitcointalk.org accounts. This is not a claim of a scam. It is merely a warning to others that Carra23 is not as anti-spam as he claims to be
I think theymos could help us to understand if the behaviour if carra23 and his signature farming if is true or not.
He can scan in deep the log of each account and let US know the truth.
I hope theymos read this thread and post some info
Having multiple accounts whether they're on the same campaign or not isn't against the forum rules though individual campaigns may disallow it, but that's up to the owners or the campaign managers to police not the staff or admins. Maybe they might get involved if there's some evidence or suspicion of wrongdoing/scamming but this doesn't really look like a scam accusation either.
It doesn't look like any scam is even being accused in this thread. It does look like there may be some conflict of interest in his avatar campaign though.
I have asked this in Meta and one of the staff said 'Reputation' sub-board is commonly used for reputation threads that we can see currently but not for criticisms.
