Topic: Warning about Carra23 - - page 2. (Read 1578 times)

nice job done by you..
desperation always leads to problems..
its not only carra..he thinks to dominate the forum..
i dont know what infos you gave are right or wrong..but the theme of desperation is correc..i agree with you.

Which campaign was this? Do you remember if anyone participated who had a lot of shit posts in the alt-coin sections?

Sound suspicious. Watching this thread. I tried to applied for a campaign which Carra23 was the manager and he/she said that my posts "alternate between quality and filler". He or she then suggested me to join BitBingo.io campaign. I rejected and stay with 777Coin campaign. Now.. looking at those accounts posts which you mentioned.. I feel.. *you know*.

There are no rules against having multiple accounts. Although the low post quality is a sign that they are creating more spam then they should.

Some of these appear to have participated in luckyb.it's signature campaign which only allows one account per person to participate (in any signature campaign) and he probably used unique cryptsy addresses for his "coin control" - this appears to be a pretty good way to avoid detection of his alts. I wonder if all of them can be confirmed to be his or not.

Thank you very much for the tip!
...and if this is true...
Some bct users can have multiple account with out proplems.
Others user are "killed" if they use multiple account...

This is democracy?
Hum. I know it with other name ! :O

A few weeks ago, HashManiacMining was running a giveaway in the GamesAndRounds section. There was one post in particular that Carra23 specifically wanted removed from the thread. Unfortunately, the thread has since been moved to the trashcan, however below is a quote of the post that Carra23 wanted so desperately to be removed:


On it's surface, this contains roughly zero information. Doing further research however, it seems that all except one of the email addresses have the same name as a bitcointalk.org account.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/carra23-122354 Carra23
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/tineye-217933 TinEye
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sumantso-103183 sumantso
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/coinshot-225241 Coinshot
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lazywhale-388740 LazyWhale

With this being said, there is nothing wrong with using multiple accounts. This account in fact is an alternate account (duh).

These accounts also have something else in common. The only address that any of these accounts has ever posted, which also matches the address in their respective profiles also just so happen to belong to cryptsy

1Q4jmiMCsWuUvyyTfYcpiUAQqZcHTPn4yW - sumantso proof - archive of profile
1H1SjQ2ddWgwrNHgNjuptuL7THEq1zB9Mh - TinEye - proof - archive of profile
1EDCG7VybqSFouPFpPbYMN314JoUnbPxXi - Coinshot - proof - archive of profile
12ujKCei3GAp85mbfDic65i5XnLoV2HNgQ - Carra23 - proof - archive of profile

Two of these accounts are enrolled in bitdice.me signature campaign. If you were to look at the transaction of the last time bitdice.me paid out their signature campaign you would see that the following addresses were paid that also belong to cryptsy:

1EKc42nPdAZhWu7XKswHB4qSzwLM2CvAtw - Fernandez - proof - archive of profile
15d4885Q9Thw7v9a1qJgSndQNLtyzS5TLo - goosoodude - proof - archive of profile

Very strangely, two of these accounts are now wearing the signature for casino evolution even though their signature campaign appears to have ended several months ago.

Now you ask, is there anything wrong with any of this? You ask, does this break any rules? The answer to these questions is 'no'. With that being said, all of these accounts have similar posting histories. These accounts also have posting histories that do not create strong posts, many would probably consider them to be spam-like posts.

Is it appropriate to trust someone to choose the strongest signature campaign participants when he himself has a long history of making spam-like posts? I cannot answer that question.

Is it appropriate to trust someone to  choose the strongest signature campaign participants when he himself has many accounts enrolled in multiple signature campaigns that pay a lot on a per-post basis? I cannot answer that question for you.

The following information is upon information and belief: A few months ago, Carra23 had contacted a few moderators and a few default trust members regarding marcotheminer, trying to get him banned for sending unsolicited PM's for trying to poach participants from carra23's campaigns, a few of which he was able to poach successfully. The issue with this is that carra23 engages in this very same behavior with other signature campaigns.

Both marcotheminer and carra23 appear to be large sources of spam within the forum, however I cannot see how one can ethically justify trying to get someone banned for doing one thing that they themselves engage in.