I realize in crypto that if your coin has not been tagged "scam"then you are not successful yet on bitcoin talk.
Tell me one successful single coin that have not been tagged
Good point. It's like with a celebrities, almost every celebrity has a large base of haters.
It's just impossible to cater to everyone, but at least with cryptocurrencies you can sell your holdings and move to another coin if you don't like something or even create "done right" fork
Haha I can remember some months ago when deep onion used to be the talk of bitcointalk forum. The community was hyping it as if it will be the next bitcoin. The devs and mods were all feeling like gods then making it very hard and impossible to get accepted in their signature campaign and banning members anyhow from the airdrops. Now even the die-hard mods then have left the project for another one.
Lesson to learn is that nothing last forever, learn when to get in and out at the right time.
Good to know, I felt really salty when I found that I missed this opportunity (having lost on another investments), according to your information they probably wouldn't accept me anyway.
The dev haven't paid any airdrops yet and when he does it maybe it's too late and it costs 200 sat already. That besides Bulwark that didn't do airdrops at all but nobody ever doubts that's scam either. They mostly all are scam.
Hi didn't pay any airdrops??? Are you sure?
yinoye mentioned that it was hard to get accepted, but how can you be sure that he didn't pay any airdrops? If that's true, then it's really sophisticated scam, because I saw posts about receiving airdrop even in my local, non-english section of BTCtalk (albeit they were mostly by person who translated DeepOnion's ann I think).
It was a total pool of coins divided by the number of accounts. It was not based on amount held. Some people cheated the system by making 5x the number of accounts and got 5x the airdrop. Now people are up in arms about unequal distribution. Honestly there is no perfect way to do this. There will be a group that feels slighted either way.
Wait, what? People above said it was very difficult/ impossible to receive airdrops and now you're saying that some users received few times there were entitled to?
Someone should do a proper investigation and found how it really was.
They thought they could give coin only to fake accounts mostly, and no one would notice. Or word wouldn't get around. Could've put a little more thought into it, maybe shared with the community for real and would've ended up a lot better.
So it's 1:3 on being able to receive airdrop as legitimate user.
Anyway, I hope those who paid for their coins manage to avoid any serious losses.