Topic: [Warning] Unnamed.exchange - do we have another exit scam? - page 6. (Read 5604 times)
Eternal silence continues....
Let us not forget this was the person who removed his unnamed.exchange signature to start promoting the Yobit signature because he was happy about getting paid freebie. What sort of a business owner would do something like that?
Failed business owner.
I cannot recall him ever giving a straight answer to the concerns that forum members raised, he seemed to take it all as a joke. Let us not forget this was the person who removed his unnamed.exchange signature to start promoting the Yobit signature because he was happy about getting paid freebie. What sort of a business owner would do something like that?
He shows some signs of life on his account, still struggling to patch up his site. Deals with the settings of some shitcoins, and successfully avoids answering questions about robed doge coins
Like any fraudster when he is discovered, this forum going to be trash and all DT members are idiots, so that’s why they leave the forum.
Scammer TillKoeln has not logged in the forum since 5th July 2021 but the scam website is still up and running. What is the latest news with the unnamed.exchange scam?
He shows some signs of life on his account, still struggling to patch up his site. Deals with the settings of some shitcoins, and successfully avoids answering questions about robed doge coins
Like any fraudster when he is discovered, this forum going to be trash and all DT members are idiots, so that’s why they leave the forum.
Scammer TillKoeln has not logged in the forum since 5th July 2021 but the scam website is still up and running. What is the latest news with the unnamed.exchange scam?
He shows some signs of life on his account, still struggling to patch up his site. Deals with the settings of some shitcoins, and successfully avoids answering questions about robed doge coins
Like any fraudster when he is discovered, this forum going to be trash and all DT members are idiots, so that’s why they leave the forum.
Quote
any comment on that ?
Complaints continue to mount as more and more people continue to report the Unnamed.exchange fraud.
Same shit here. I was playing on purpose and deposit 2$ worth of coins. Can't withdraw (unknown reason), DOGE coin fee 50 coins for withdraw.
They are trying to SCARE people from withdraw DOGE (their words on exchange when you try to withdraw).
Bugs everywhere. Stuck sell stuck buy, need to refresh page, bugy on brawe browser.
Avoid or be scammed.
What has that got to do with TillKoeln and his unnamed.exchange scam?
u hear about the flooding in germany??
Scammer TillKoeln has not logged in the forum since 5th July 2021 but the scam website is still up and running. What is the latest news with the unnamed.exchange scam?
u hear about the flooding in germany??
he lives there? perhaps destroyed home or else
What has that got to do with TillKoeln and his unnamed.exchange scam?
u hear about the flooding in germany??
Scammer TillKoeln has not logged in the forum since 5th July 2021 but the scam website is still up and running. What is the latest news with the unnamed.exchange scam?
u hear about the flooding in germany??
Scammer TillKoeln has not logged in the forum since 5th July 2021 but the scam website is still up and running. What is the latest news with the unnamed.exchange scam?
u hear about the flooding in germany??
Scammer TillKoeln has not logged in the forum since 5th July 2021 but the scam website is still up and running. What is the latest news with the unnamed.exchange scam?
What's more concerning is that these scam exchangers collected enough money and knowledge to setup a new exchange with a new name to continue the scamming business. 
"not your keys, not your coins"... the only solution for this problem is to use a DEX... eg https://atomicdex.io
Quote
any comment on that ?
Complaints continue to mount as more and more people continue to report the Unnamed.exchange fraud.
Don't expect that those cases will be resolved. It seems the exchange will continue to exists until they found more investors willing to deposit in this exchange
What's more concerning is that these scam exchangers collected enough money and knowledge to setup a new exchange with a new name to continue the scamming business.
After looking at all the problems faced by users, I feel like I was maybe right when I compared yobit with unnamed because they had a lot of similarities and now users are facing similar kind of problems as well.
I made this thread but I failed to verify my claims: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5288936
I hope people get their money because such kinds of problems usually end up with users losing all their money.
I made this thread but I failed to verify my claims: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5288936
I hope people get their money because such kinds of problems usually end up with users losing all their money.
Quote
any comment on that ?
Complaints continue to mount as more and more people continue to report the Unnamed.exchange fraud.
Excellent link, thank you for posting but TillKoeln decided to skip past it without responding. Maybe you caught him off guard
I just visited the website, how is it possible they are still operating? With all the scam accusations surrounding them I thought they would be shut down by now.
Recently I have been unable to login here as much as I would like to because of time constraints, what is the latest with the unnamed.exchange scammers?
Recently I have been unable to login here as much as I would like to because of time constraints, what is the latest with the unnamed.exchange scammers?
They do nothing. Throw threats and pretend nothing happened. lol
I repeat myself, its not a threat, its a fact. You over and over break the tos, which means you are not welcome.
You got no shame at all? You aren't breaking your own TOS and above all, LAW by losing and withelding our coins? WTF? Do you even listen to yourself?
Freaking criminal. But we are the problem, ofcourse!
When all users will be able to withdraw their Doge? all in some distant future. Stop giving fake promises.
You and TillKoeln are not very representative examples who can complain to anyone about the credibility. Your behaviour in this case is more than reckless.
I guess you waiting for the price to drop and to cover Doge debts. You will keep the profit to yourself, the loss you have made to your customers, doesn’t interest you.
You and TillKoeln are not very representative examples who can complain to anyone about the credibility. Your behaviour in this case is more than reckless.
I guess you waiting for the price to drop and to cover Doge debts. You will keep the profit to yourself, the loss you have made to your customers, doesn’t interest you.
Hash posts has ZERO value. For months he was saying "all is fine", accusing us for FUD-ing, calling us noobs and god knows what not... to finally admit that indeed exchange has problems. ROFL! Ridiculous.
Quote
any comment on that ?
Complaints continue to mount as more and more people continue to report the Unnamed.exchange fraud.
i dont criticize someone,
i ask him to give an comment on that.
,
and i asked for your account name,
not to solve your problem as first lol
that is not how it works, its an queue system, it hasn't any effect how often or loud you moan
so again,
whats your account name ?
and to bitmaster1 , you take money from my exchange, next to that.
any comment from you about your SEC Ban for scam Customers ?
https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/CLG050016_FDA_JM993040%20%282019-1563254358979%29.pdf
i ask him to give an comment on that.
,
and i asked for your account name,
not to solve your problem as first lol
that is not how it works, its an queue system, it hasn't any effect how often or loud you moan
so again,
whats your account name ?
and to bitmaster1 , you take money from my exchange, next to that.
any comment from you about your SEC Ban for scam Customers ?
https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/CLG050016_FDA_JM993040%20%282019-1563254358979%29.pdf
what is your acc name ?
if you don't wanna share that public, send me an PM, or post the ticket id.
You can start from 1st page of this thread and solve one by one withdrawal issue. there are many of them. Also in your ANN thread
and bitmaster, any comment on that ?
You insist from bitmaster to comment this, and you ignore to give answers for the problems you have caused. You keep someone else's money, you denied them the opportunity to make money from their funds. it is utter rudeness from you to criticize someone here
what is your acc name ?
if you don't wanna share that public, send me an PM, or post the ticket id.
and bitmaster, any comment on that ?
TOS
i read through all posts and have some questions,
isn't unnamed acting according to the TOS ? that Bitmaster confirmed that there was an double spend attack made by his team,
and the tos say clearly that something like this result into blocked account and funds. or about what is he talking ?
but a fact is definatly that bitmaster knows what he talks about,
the SEC ban him from StockTrading for lifetime, reason : scammed customer and investors.
https://i.imgur.com/BFoIsWP.png
https://i.imgur.com/APOOwiD.png
that's the original document from finra "Financial Industry Regulatory Authority" with bitmasters confession to scam at least 40 customer
https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/CLG050016_FDA_JM993040%20%282019-1563254358979%29.pdf
earning deficit 7 Million Dollar.
Code:
stated that Alfa's net losses were $558,493,
its retained earnings deficit was $5,803,728, while total revenues were
$37,538. According to its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31,2002, Alfa's net losses increased to $789,511, its retained earnings
deficit rose to $6,610,254, and total revenues for the year were
$53,687. According to its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31,2003, Alfa's net losses were $706,801, its retained earnings deficit
rose to $7,444,392, and total revenues dropped to $17,514. The 2001,
2002, and 2003 Forms 10-KSB each contained a going-concern clause.
its retained earnings deficit was $5,803,728, while total revenues were
$37,538. According to its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31,2002, Alfa's net losses increased to $789,511, its retained earnings
deficit rose to $6,610,254, and total revenues for the year were
$53,687. According to its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31,2003, Alfa's net losses were $706,801, its retained earnings deficit
rose to $7,444,392, and total revenues dropped to $17,514. The 2001,
2002, and 2003 Forms 10-KSB each contained a going-concern clause.
Code:
Lueung marketed the Alfa private placement as separate investments in
securities of Contact Sports and Journey of Light when in fact
customers received shares of Alfa. Lueung told his clients that the
private offering was an initial public offering of securities of Contact
Sports and Journey of Light. Lueung relied solely on the issuer's
representations in recommending the secunties to his customers.
Lueung held himself out to his customers as having conducted an
appropriate investigation and reasonable due diligence into Alfa, but he
failed to do so. In recommending Alfa, Lueung made material
misrepresentations about the company's securities and failed to
disclose material adverse facts that he was or should have been aware
of, including the company's financial condition. Lueung did not
disclose the company's financial condition, as set forth in its Forms 10-
KSB, for example, nor that Alfa was the subject of a going-concern
clause in its financial statements foreach of three years from 2001
through 2003. Lueung made statements about Alfa and its business,
including stock price projections and guarantees, for which he had no
basis.?He-told.one customerthai he should mortgage his house to come
up with the money to buy the stock. He said that the sports and sports
apparel industry was recession-proof. Lueung compared investing in
Journey ofLight's development project in Qatar to investing in Las
Vegas decades ago because both were located in deserts. Lueung also
told at least one investor that he could ignore the risk disclosures in
Alfa's private placement memorandum because they had nothing to do
with Contact Sports and Journey ofLight's business prospects.
securities of Contact Sports and Journey of Light when in fact
customers received shares of Alfa. Lueung told his clients that the
private offering was an initial public offering of securities of Contact
Sports and Journey of Light. Lueung relied solely on the issuer's
representations in recommending the secunties to his customers.
Lueung held himself out to his customers as having conducted an
appropriate investigation and reasonable due diligence into Alfa, but he
failed to do so. In recommending Alfa, Lueung made material
misrepresentations about the company's securities and failed to
disclose material adverse facts that he was or should have been aware
of, including the company's financial condition. Lueung did not
disclose the company's financial condition, as set forth in its Forms 10-
KSB, for example, nor that Alfa was the subject of a going-concern
clause in its financial statements foreach of three years from 2001
through 2003. Lueung made statements about Alfa and its business,
including stock price projections and guarantees, for which he had no
basis.?He-told.one customerthai he should mortgage his house to come
up with the money to buy the stock. He said that the sports and sports
apparel industry was recession-proof. Lueung compared investing in
Journey ofLight's development project in Qatar to investing in Las
Vegas decades ago because both were located in deserts. Lueung also
told at least one investor that he could ignore the risk disclosures in
Alfa's private placement memorandum because they had nothing to do
with Contact Sports and Journey ofLight's business prospects.
any comment on that ?
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
I think you have stated it clearly, they have no credibility and are simply stalling for time.
One of the advantages that anonymous exchange operators - those that do not state the name and address of the owner and do not list the legal jurisdiction that will be applied in the event of litigation within their Terms of Service and Privacy Policy - believe they have is that they are not under pressure when they start to go down a route that unnamed.exchange has gone because they think they can act with impunity.
As long as these types of one-man-band exchanges continue to operate there will be victims, it is as simple as that.
When all users will be able to withdraw their Doge? all in some distant future. Stop giving fake promises.
You and TillKoeln are not very representative examples who can complain to anyone about the credibility. Your behaviour in this case is more than reckless.
I guess you waiting for the price to drop and to cover Doge debts. You will keep the profit to yourself, the loss you have made to your customers, doesn’t interest you.
One of the advantages that anonymous exchange operators - those that do not state the name and address of the owner and do not list the legal jurisdiction that will be applied in the event of litigation within their Terms of Service and Privacy Policy - believe they have is that they are not under pressure when they start to go down a route that unnamed.exchange has gone because they think they can act with impunity.
As long as these types of one-man-band exchanges continue to operate there will be victims, it is as simple as that.
The latest new is that every single doge is being paid back. Even miner/ivicmaric up there will get it all back.
Why is it still operating? Because Unnamed doesn't quit just because of a bump in the road.
Why is it still operating? Because Unnamed doesn't quit just because of a bump in the road.
When all users will be able to withdraw their Doge? all in some distant future. Stop giving fake promises.
You and TillKoeln are not very representative examples who can complain to anyone about the credibility. Your behaviour in this case is more than reckless.
I guess you waiting for the price to drop and to cover Doge debts. You will keep the profit to yourself, the loss you have made to your customers, doesn’t interest you.
TOS
i read through all posts and have some questions,
isn't unnamed acting according to the TOS ? that Bitmaster confirmed that there was an double spend attack made by his team,
and the tos say clearly that something like this result into blocked account and funds. or about what is he talking ?
but a fact is definatly that bitmaster knows what he talks about,
the SEC ban him from StockTrading for lifetime, reason : scammed customer and investors.
https://i.imgur.com/BFoIsWP.png
https://i.imgur.com/APOOwiD.png
that's the original document from finra "Financial Industry Regulatory Authority" with bitmasters confession to scam at least 40 customer
https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/CLG050016_FDA_JM993040%20%282019-1563254358979%29.pdf
earning deficit 7 Million Dollar.
Code:
stated that Alfa's net losses were $558,493,
its retained earnings deficit was $5,803,728, while total revenues were
$37,538. According to its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31,2002, Alfa's net losses increased to $789,511, its retained earnings
deficit rose to $6,610,254, and total revenues for the year were
$53,687. According to its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31,2003, Alfa's net losses were $706,801, its retained earnings deficit
rose to $7,444,392, and total revenues dropped to $17,514. The 2001,
2002, and 2003 Forms 10-KSB each contained a going-concern clause.
its retained earnings deficit was $5,803,728, while total revenues were
$37,538. According to its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31,2002, Alfa's net losses increased to $789,511, its retained earnings
deficit rose to $6,610,254, and total revenues for the year were
$53,687. According to its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31,2003, Alfa's net losses were $706,801, its retained earnings deficit
rose to $7,444,392, and total revenues dropped to $17,514. The 2001,
2002, and 2003 Forms 10-KSB each contained a going-concern clause.
Code:
Lueung marketed the Alfa private placement as separate investments in
securities of Contact Sports and Journey of Light when in fact
customers received shares of Alfa. Lueung told his clients that the
private offering was an initial public offering of securities of Contact
Sports and Journey of Light. Lueung relied solely on the issuer's
representations in recommending the secunties to his customers.
Lueung held himself out to his customers as having conducted an
appropriate investigation and reasonable due diligence into Alfa, but he
failed to do so. In recommending Alfa, Lueung made material
misrepresentations about the company's securities and failed to
disclose material adverse facts that he was or should have been aware
of, including the company's financial condition. Lueung did not
disclose the company's financial condition, as set forth in its Forms 10-
KSB, for example, nor that Alfa was the subject of a going-concern
clause in its financial statements foreach of three years from 2001
through 2003. Lueung made statements about Alfa and its business,
including stock price projections and guarantees, for which he had no
basis.?He-told.one customerthai he should mortgage his house to come
up with the money to buy the stock. He said that the sports and sports
apparel industry was recession-proof. Lueung compared investing in
Journey ofLight's development project in Qatar to investing in Las
Vegas decades ago because both were located in deserts. Lueung also
told at least one investor that he could ignore the risk disclosures in
Alfa's private placement memorandum because they had nothing to do
with Contact Sports and Journey ofLight's business prospects.
securities of Contact Sports and Journey of Light when in fact
customers received shares of Alfa. Lueung told his clients that the
private offering was an initial public offering of securities of Contact
Sports and Journey of Light. Lueung relied solely on the issuer's
representations in recommending the secunties to his customers.
Lueung held himself out to his customers as having conducted an
appropriate investigation and reasonable due diligence into Alfa, but he
failed to do so. In recommending Alfa, Lueung made material
misrepresentations about the company's securities and failed to
disclose material adverse facts that he was or should have been aware
of, including the company's financial condition. Lueung did not
disclose the company's financial condition, as set forth in its Forms 10-
KSB, for example, nor that Alfa was the subject of a going-concern
clause in its financial statements foreach of three years from 2001
through 2003. Lueung made statements about Alfa and its business,
including stock price projections and guarantees, for which he had no
basis.?He-told.one customerthai he should mortgage his house to come
up with the money to buy the stock. He said that the sports and sports
apparel industry was recession-proof. Lueung compared investing in
Journey ofLight's development project in Qatar to investing in Las
Vegas decades ago because both were located in deserts. Lueung also
told at least one investor that he could ignore the risk disclosures in
Alfa's private placement memorandum because they had nothing to do
with Contact Sports and Journey ofLight's business prospects.
any comment on that ?
Jump to: