If Tomboy911 is able to produce any crypto address that originally deposited to DuckDice, or perhaps an old withdrawal address, doesn't that show a cryptographic connection?
Signing a message would bring some more evidence for account ownership.
If they're able to find an address from 2019, then that should at least show that they own the same wallet.
That would be a solution , but unfortunately if it's the actual case that he purchased the account from the initial owner ( which probably is ) , then he could simply ask the initial owner to sign an address on his behalf.
Is a complete change in speech pattern , basically going from fluent english to broken english , the email + password change around the same time , aswell as the ip change ( by change I mean different continents ) not enough "circumstancial" evidence to prove that he's not the initial owner of the account ?? As well as the fact that he's chasing on a bet that happened in 2019 , boy911 was refunded for that ( even though he probably shouldn't have ) , continued playing for almost 2 more years and was giving quite positive reviews for duckdice , then when all these changes happened , this guy pops up claiming he's been scammed ? And now the Boy911 being directly linked to other accounts , including Akruti09 , and on this thread the first member to pop-up is an Akruti username , claiming he has nothing to do with it . Is this not enough to prove that the current Tomboy911 owner is simply a scam artist trying to milk some more money from duckdice ? ( he already got around 1000 $ + an estimate of 2000-3000$ from the free faucets)...