Pages:
Author

Topic: WARP - Something different - VPN Wallet BETA Release - Bittrex/YoBit - page 73. (Read 116015 times)

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
No risk, no fun!

Yes, really important point. I plan to present a formal application to various exchanges tomorrow after the distribution.


From my point of view, a cryptocurrency is a community project. Understood?  Wink

warper did a portuguese translation without even being asked! He looks quite dedicated to WARP Smiley But not really part of the development team.
We sure are a small community by now!


About the 600 coins, I think the best is to run a faucet.
Maybe someone can set one up?

I have not the time to do this, but I can share you a link:

https://99bitcoins.com/complete-beginners-guide-make-money-bitcoin-faucet/

Greetz
Steve
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502

Yes, really important point. I plan to present a formal application to various exchanges tomorrow after the distribution.


From my point of view, a cryptocurrency is a community project. Understood?  Wink

warper did a portuguese translation without even being asked! He looks quite dedicated to WARP Smiley But not really part of the development team.
We sure are a small community by now!


About the 600 coins, I think the best is to run a faucet.
Maybe someone can set one up?
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
No risk, no fun!

From my point of view, a cryptocurrency is a community project. Understood?  Wink

OK...you are not in the warpteam.

Thanks for your fast answer Wink
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
No risk, no fun!
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
No risk, no fun!
Initial plan is already broken no matter what you do with those PoS generated coins. They were not supposed to exist at all at this time. And yes, I think you are doing all this to bump this thread.

Restoring trust? Dumbshit, I and anyone else dead-serious about money, economy and everything else human-made and human-dependant have joined cryptocoins exactly because no trust is required for it to work. You are on the wrong forum, go to "I am banker so trust me" one. Here you are 100% playing "trust me, I am honest" and because no exchange (which I would trust way more than you) is involved it is highly likely you are scammer. There is zero guarantee you will do anything other than send coins to loser investors and, so far, 95% such deals around here were scams.

This is my last warning to investors, I don't want to help this guy anymore in any way so no more posts (thread bumps) from me.

Its not your decision to warn another for their risks! Like you wrote itself, you can go and left here. So, no one care for your typed letters!

Greetz
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
Initial plan is already broken no matter what you do with those PoS generated coins. They were not supposed to exist at all at this time. And yes, I think you are doing all this to bump this thread.

Restoring trust? Dumbshit, I and anyone else dead-serious about money, economy and everything else human-made and human-dependant have joined cryptocoins exactly because no trust is required for it to work. You are on the wrong forum, go to "I am banker so trust me" one. Here you are 100% playing "trust me, I am honest" and because no exchange (which I would trust way more than you) is involved it is highly likely you are scammer. There is zero guarantee you will do anything other than send coins to loser investors and, so far, 95% such deals around here were scams.

This is my last warning to investors, I don't want to help this guy anymore in any way so no more posts (thread bumps) from me.

I get it. You don't care to take me seriously and made up your mind that I'm here to fool everyone. Have your opinion man!
Good luck raising money for projects where no trust is necessary.
hero member
Activity: 651
Merit: 518
Initial plan is already broken no matter what you do with those PoS generated coins. They were not supposed to exist at all at this time. And yes, I think you are doing all this to bump this thread.

Restoring trust? Dumbshit, I and anyone else dead-serious about money, economy and everything else human-made and human-dependant have joined cryptocoins exactly because no trust is required for it to work. You are on the wrong forum, go to "I am banker so trust me" one. Here you are 100% playing "trust me, I am honest" and because no exchange (which I would trust way more than you) is involved it is highly likely you are scammer. There is zero guarantee you will do anything other than send coins to loser investors and, so far, 95% such deals around here were scams.

This is my last warning to investors, I don't want to help this guy anymore in any way so no more posts (thread bumps) from me.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502

So before this coin even launched you have already broke the promise? And now you are using broken promise to make people post more so this thread stays on the first page, so lame of you.

If he destroys them initial plan would fail because maximum supply would be less than 1,618,000 WARP. So the only right thing to do here would be to distribute those coins to investors, it would break initial plan as well but with less damage caused. Third option would be that developer keeps those coins which would be a super lame outcome, why not as well let him stake few thousands more so that he does not have to buy any coins later?

Now I am even more convinced that my original thoughts about this project posted earlier at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13609751 will be proven correct. Anyone who is at this forum for more than a year should know there were like 100+ other altcoins which had much better story, supposed purpose, name, logo, roadmap, developer team and many other things but all failed miserably after a while or were a scam from the begging, with nothing realy delivered. I think shapetwist cleverly played on the fact most people tend to forget very quickly.

And it is realy shocking to me that some people are ready to invest 1+ BTC into a project that is not listed on even one exchange. A year or so ago one exchange prior to lunch would be a bare minimum for anything to be taken seriously but, obviously, now it takes even less for people to fall for scams here.

Are you seriously suggesting that I'm asking for the community's opinion only so the thread gets bumped?

You don't even suggest the best option, in my opinion, which is to donate the coins for a WARP related service: faucet, translations, paper wallet, etc. Nothing is broken: the supply offered and max coins are intact.

You know what I cleverly did? Presented a serious and realistic project, which I agree, it's not very common around here. You know what makes a great coin? You can have all the fancy logos and roadmap infographics and cool staking features and blah blah - yet you have to listen to what the community really wants. Restoring trust!

Sounds like there's not much left to pick on, you're attacking me just because. Again, I invite you to come around later to see that you are wrong.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
hero member
Activity: 651
Merit: 518
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

So before this coin even launched you have already broke the promise? And now you are using broken promise to make people post more so this thread stays on the first page, so lame of you.

I say destroy them so the initial plan works!

If he destroys them initial plan would fail because maximum supply would be less than 1,618,000 WARP. So the only right thing to do here would be to distribute those coins to investors, it would break initial plan as well but with less damage caused. Third option would be that developer keeps those coins which would be a super lame outcome, why not as well let him stake few thousands more so that he does not have to buy any coins later?

Now I am even more convinced that my original thoughts about this project posted earlier at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13609751 will be proven correct. Anyone who is at this forum for more than a year should know there were like 100+ other altcoins which had much better story, supposed purpose, name, logo, roadmap, developer team and many other things but all failed miserably after a while or were a scam from the begging, with nothing realy delivered. I think shapetwist cleverly played on the fact most people tend to forget very quickly.

And it is realy shocking to me that some people are ready to invest 1+ BTC into a project that is not listed on even one exchange. A year or so ago one exchange prior to lunch would be a bare minimum for anything to be taken seriously but, obviously, now it takes even less for people to fall for scams here.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
What's the block time?
full member
Activity: 190
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
Is there a countdown timer to when to when sale ends??

As per info graphic in opening post "Crowdfunding opens Monday, 18th Jan, 12:00 CET and closes Thursday, 28th Jan, 12:00 CET"
hero member
Activity: 678
Merit: 1000
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

Fine by me! More thoughts?
You should definitely do it! Smiley
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
I'm impressed with the momentum thus far.

Just for fun, let's throw out our guesses of the final total for the funding.

I'll go with 22 btc...

legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1001
Is there a countdown timer to when to when sale ends??
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
WARP translation to the Portuguese language is live at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/w-a-r-p-uma-alternativa-diferente-novas-exchanges-1342230 (still needs better formatting)
hero member
Activity: 491
Merit: 500
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

I say destroy them so the initial plan works!

You could destroy them, or you could donate them to be a faucet for warp?

What do people think about having a warp faucet with the 601.30386127 WARP as it's base?

If they are destroyed, I'm sure some people will donate to a faucet anyways.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear.
The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong.

I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.



Well, in this case, I agree with pokeytex: better to destroy them, and stick the initial plan Wink

Agreeing with Pokeytex Wink
Pages:
Jump to: