Pages:
Author

Topic: WARP - Something different - VPN Wallet BETA Release - Bittrex/YoBit - page 74. (Read 116015 times)

newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear.
The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong.

I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.



Well, in this case, I agree with pokeytex: better to destroy them, and stick the initial plan Wink
full member
Activity: 190
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear.
The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong.

I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.



If this is the case and all coins have already been accounted for in the initial supply for the crowdfund and any bounties etc. and if there are no new bounties they can be allocated to then the best course of action would be to destroy/burn them.
legendary
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

I say destroy them so the initial plan works!
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear.
The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong.

I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.


yes, for expl. do bounties for translations. can win you some extra audience  Wink GL
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear.
The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong.

I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.

full member
Activity: 190
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

Fine by me! More thoughts?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
SLAYED! haha, good retort
don't mind those accounts i swear there's an army of fud shills on here ;p


I really don't mind. I knew what I was getting into from the beginning.
Never hide, answer honestly, face everything. A lesson for many coin developers out there that wish to make a real honest project.
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
hey guys this launch looks pretty clean so i guess ill come create some FUD so i can catch your coins, 900shat crowdsale up too is too much for my cheap ass ;p
1; another spots dev
2; this dev has no stake, basically told "make this successful, we both get rich" (by still anon 3rd party)
3; easily an exit scam, account value of 0.03 for 10btc? Wink

anywayz, chew on that
take care yourself guys

You won't be catching any coins with your FUD attempt Smiley
900 shat is expensive? Show me a coin with 1 mil supply and solid innovative features that offers such price at launch.

I know what Spots is because they commented on this thread bashing me for not doing it via escrow.

Account value? My account has no price, it is mine. It represents my views. Check: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13583952

Good attempt! Hah Smiley

SLAYED! haha, good retort
don't mind those accounts i swear there's an army of fud shills on here ;p
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
hey guys this launch looks pretty clean so i guess ill come create some FUD so i can catch your coins, 900shat crowdsale up too is too much for my cheap ass ;p
1; another spots dev
2; this dev has no stake, basically told "make this successful, we both get rich" (by still anon 3rd party)
3; easily an exit scam, account value of 0.03 for 10btc? Wink

anywayz, chew on that
take care yourself guys

You won't be catching any coins with your FUD attempt Smiley
900 shat is expensive? Show me a coin with 1 mil supply and solid innovative features that offers such price at launch.

I know what Spots is because they commented on this thread bashing me for not doing it via escrow.

Account value? My account has no price, it is mine. It represents my views. Check: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13583952

Good attempt! Hah Smiley
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Judge a Man not by his postcount,but by activity
hey guys this launch looks pretty clean so i guess ill come create some FUD so i can catch your coins, 900shat crowdsale up too is too much for my cheap ass ;p
1; another spots dev
2; this dev has no stake, basically told "make this successful, we both get rich" (by still anon 3rd party)
3; easily an exit scam, account value of 0.03 for 10btc? Wink

anywayz, chew on that
take care yourself guys
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
Congratulations on 10.3 BTC level hit!

Nice barrier to hit!
legendary
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
Congratulations on 10.3 BTC level hit!
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
The problem with every ico is that the person running it can buy as many of the tokens as they want for free since the btc goes straight back to them. Which is why every ico is inherently suspect/a scam.

I know that very well. That is why I have pledged not to do so from the beginning. I have put up a buying system that allows everybody to check transactions themselves and report unusual behavior. Transactions are not really anonymous and you know that. If this ICO was on an exchange, you had no way of controlling the addresses.
I understand your concerns, but I'm doing everything out in the open. I bought an hardware wallet to safely store the funds offline and let people see where they go by posting the address once they are there.

And I know that scams are the usual thing around here. That's why I started this. I'm gonna prove that wrong. No hiding, no moderated threads, no bullshit. I even offered Bittrex my proof of ID.
Investors are safe, and I will deliver.
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100

Correct. I didn't change my mind and now want some. The funds won't go to my pocket, I won't profit from it. I invested btc in the project like you guys, because I believed it would be successful and that would be funded to continue development.
Are you saying that I can't use funds to pay for stuff that was already developed? So I'm losing here. Remember, I don't have WARP. You are buying WARP.

Not really the same when all the btc goes straight back to you is it? People never learn.

By "I invested btc in the project like you guys", I mean my own btc, before I even presented the project. I had a professional designer, I did research, I hired people for small tasks, I bought domain, servers.
What is wrong with that?

The problem with every ico is that the person running it can buy as many of the tokens as they want for free since the btc goes straight back to them. Which is why every ico is inherently suspect/a scam.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0

Correct. I didn't change my mind and now want some. The funds won't go to my pocket, I won't profit from it. I invested btc in the project like you guys, because I believed it would be successful and that would be funded to continue development.
Are you saying that I can't use funds to pay for stuff that was already developed? So I'm losing here. Remember, I don't have WARP. You are buying WARP.

Not really the same when all the btc goes straight back to you is it? People never learn.

By "I invested btc in the project like you guys", I mean my own btc, before I even presented the project. I had a professional designer, I did research, I hired people for small tasks, I bought domain, servers.
What is wrong with that?

Not only BTC, but OP invested his time and efforts with the works developed up to now, if I may give my opinion. He deserves a remuneration.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502

Correct. I didn't change my mind and now want some. The funds won't go to my pocket, I won't profit from it. I invested btc in the project like you guys, because I believed it would be successful and that would be funded to continue development.
Are you saying that I can't use funds to pay for stuff that was already developed? So I'm losing here. Remember, I don't have WARP. You are buying WARP.

Not really the same when all the btc goes straight back to you is it? People never learn.

By "I invested btc in the project like you guys", I mean my own btc, before I even presented the project. I had a professional designer, I did research, I hired people for small tasks, I bought domain, servers.
What is wrong with that?
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
* And by the way, this project was self funded so far. I don't intend to earn anything directly from the crowdfunding. Funding will allow to develop apps and services that generate value.

You don't intend to earn anything directly from crowdfunding? Did you change your mind and now you want some? Just curious.

Correct. I didn't change my mind and now want some. The funds won't go to my pocket, I won't profit from it. I invested btc in the project like you guys, because I believed it would be successful and that would be funded to continue development.
Are you saying that I can't use funds to pay for stuff that was already developed? So I'm losing here. Remember, I don't have WARP. You are buying WARP.

Not really the same when all the btc goes straight back to you is it? Some people never learn.
Pages:
Jump to: