Topic: Was the Great Pyramid a Giant Lightening Rod? - page 3. (Read 10081 times)
Sure there is some kind of static electricity involved as you can see in this picture.
So if you follow the links you find out the pic is photoshopped. Does this change your opinion about this theory?
I still think its an interesting one. And yea zahi hawass has been holding us back from knowing whatever is under that sphinx for awhile now. Whoever replaces him may not be any better though...
I still think its an interesting one. And yea zahi hawass has been holding us back from knowing whatever is under that sphinx for awhile now. Whoever replaces him may not be any better though...
they had nothing to do with the egyptians and they didn't build anything in stone.
That's not necessarily true.
If you watch Quest for the Lost Civilization, Graham Hancock astronomically links many monumental sites, including the Giza pyramids, back to around 12,000 years ago.
Also, there is evidence of a cover-up among Egyptologists to hide something, perhaps this link.
I was in Giza in 1976 and there was a giant lightning rod on top of the Great Pyramid.
Hieroglyphs was an egyptian plagiation of the Sumerian Cunifer writing system. Which dates them pretty accurate to between 2500-1500 BC.
The way you construct meaning in setences in Hieroglyphs is the same as in Sumerian.
In the desserts around the Giza plateau there have been found remains of primitive settlements and normadic tribes which dates back maybe 12.000 years. The climate was wetter then there were swamps and freshwater crocks, but they had nothing to do with the egyptians and they didn't build anything in stone.
Hieroglyphs was an egyptian plagiation of the Sumerian Cunifer writing system. Which dates them pretty accurate to between 2500-1500 BC.
The way you construct meaning in setences in Hieroglyphs is the same as in Sumerian.
In the desserts around the Giza plateau there have been found remains of primitive settlements and normadic tribes which dates back maybe 12.000 years. The climate was wetter then there were swamps and freshwater crocks, but they had nothing to do with the egyptians and they didn't build anything in stone.
I don't know the sphinx is thought to be many thousands of years older thought. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Schoch
http://articles.latimes.com/1991-10-23/news/mn-183_1_great-sphinxthis article also mentions john anthony west who is a friend of gerald celente gerald celente knows what he talks about and is not afraid to say it that gerald cellente calls john anthony west a very good friend of his should really give him quite a bit of trust worthiness as a starter.
These people are propositioning that the sphinx is at least twice as old as currently accepted. Researcher of old and possibly lost civilizations graham hancock expects it is more likely made after the last ice age 14.000 thousand years ago.
The estimation of the age of the sphinx are based on erosions by rain. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Anthony_West
The religious settlement Gobekli tepe has been carbon dated to a incredible 11000 years old.
http://articles.latimes.com/1991-10-23/news/mn-183_1_great-sphinxthis article also mentions john anthony west who is a friend of gerald celente gerald celente knows what he talks about and is not afraid to say it that gerald cellente calls john anthony west a very good friend of his should really give him quite a bit of trust worthiness as a starter.
These people are propositioning that the sphinx is at least twice as old as currently accepted. Researcher of old and possibly lost civilizations graham hancock expects it is more likely made after the last ice age 14.000 thousand years ago.
The estimation of the age of the sphinx are based on erosions by rain. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Anthony_West
The religious settlement Gobekli tepe has been carbon dated to a incredible 11000 years old.
Jump to: