Topic: WAVES - Complete Blockchain ecosystem for a token economy - page 11. (Read 130958 times)

How to make x100 up to x500 on $200 000 to $500 000 investment before end of year using this one time method which was 6 years in development:

1. Buy 440 000 000 M2 vault tokens for 65 000 waves:
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES

2. I will proceed to stake 20 000 waves at 10% apy which will generate exit liquidity after x100-x500 pump from $100k market cap to $10m-$50m. 440m tokens is 90% of active supply so x500 pump will be very easy and cost a few thousand dollars to sustain. 20 000 waves will generate $300 exit liquidity per month when waves $1.64 and $3000+ if waves goes up $20+. I will also buy a few hundred thousand wx and try to verify the vault for more organic investor visibility here: https://waves.exchange/governance/tokens_verification

3. After the vault is verified and the new market cap of $50m attains 2000+ ranking on coincodex many new investors will know about this project. This increases the chance of third party capital inflow which will accelerate your exit at x500 profit.

4. Together with the vault tokens I will mint and send 30 NFTs on Rarible which is the underlying vault asset. The art and token causality is certified by multiple off chain references as the first to market invention of fractionalized digital blockchain integrated art:
https://docdro.id/fbY6USO
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30480040
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYncunJ_F5s

And this is the reason for $50m valuation, because it is the only high res digitally created art with its own token vault with 2017 timestamp. It is an ABT not Vintage NFT. If it was vintage NFT the value could range anywhere from $100m to $4 billion. Every other ABT that was created in 2017 were using forex or gold as token backing whereas I used an art collection. It is the first type of fractionalized vault to deploy image assets as the swap function (patent study 1800-14-04).

5. It was appraised to $2m in 2021 when cryptopunks were trading at $10k floor (today $90k):
https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

6. In order to further monetize $50m market value the NFTs will be auctioned at Christies and partnered with a prestigious art gallery who can exhibit the collection internationally at Artbasel and so forth to build establishment provenance. This requires the buyer to be well connected but we can still generate the $50m paper profit on $200k to $500k initial the difference is simply the pace of ROI.

There is no other similar project on the market and never will be until backwards timetravel is invented. The nearest is $100m-$4bn assets like Mooncats/Cryptopunks and other Art based NFTs. Certainly nothing in the $200k-$500k price class in exchange for 90% of supply.

I am also selling an ERC-20 vault backed by the same art collection. Price $3m USDT. In total there are 3 vaults on eth, waves and xcp backed by 30 artworks created in 2016 and crypto ported in 2017 and NFT migrated in 2021/22. The original idea was to swap tokens for physical artbooks priced at $10k/unit and this function is still active but today NFTs are the stronger use case for long term wealth building. Which is the reason I minted the art as NFTs.

The waves version is a basement bargain at $200k to $500k (accepting offers). Not only will the buyer gain access to a unique vintage ABT portfolio but also generate x500 immediate paper profit sustained by $300-$3000 monthly exit liquidity to realize $50 million dollars on as little as $200k invested into a real project with 6 years performance data on trusted aggregators such as coincodex. Which is also an irreplicable first to market invention with a patent study to prove it.

Concluding remarks:

- The vault was already bought and sold to a Russian investor for 4000 waves in 2019 ($4000 usdt) before NFT boom. 400m tokens were repurchased March 28 2022 and for this reason I am preparing public sale 2.0 post NFT emergence.

- The NFTs on Rarible are illiquid because there is no sales data so no one can see them because they are unranked due to no sales history. The value proposition is within the token vault in combination with off chain provenance to prove token and art causality. The NFTs may gain dominance in the price discovery in the future but regardless of such outcome the importance of this acquisition is the provenance of the token vault with a secondary value tied to the NFTs as they are relatively newly minted (and in fact will be minted on demand after acquisition as it is the eth version which is presently published on rarible). It is also the token vault which is most liquid and also will sustain exit capital from waves apy.
https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale

- The delivery vessel of the art is irrelevant I chose NFTs because they are a convenience and suitable innovation to commodify this style of asset. The value proposition is in the utility intent of the token vault in combination with provenance to certify which images are part of the original integration which is this catalogue: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59f96db06957da0ad5ec0089/t/5a50228d8165f5deaa3b7524/1515201295577/20171201opti.pdf

So for those who don't understand what you are buying here or why the NFTs minted in 2022 should hold any value (which is not necessary): you are buying a system design (vault) to fractionalize art based assets. The value component is within the certification that it was deployed in 2017 and contains 6 years price data which is 4 years more than any other NFTx counterpart. Which is basically an enternity in this industry. Culturally speaking this is pioneering in the integration with crypto tokens of art based assets whether physical or digital. No one in 2017 was even close to such invention as the other ABTs were gold or forex backed and Cryptopunks at the time did not consider the importance of a tokenized vault for liquidity and branding purposes. Punkbasic is 2021 timestamp that's 4 years later than my vault...

The reason this is not already worth $100m+ is because (vintage) crypto art collectors only value any NFT coding in the smart contract and NFTs on eth chain is worth alot more than waves. Like I said I have an eth vault too but it will cost $3m USDT, NOT $200k to $500k like this waves version.
https://etherscan.io/token/0xa4daae9552cd2390ee1dcdd1a76bc8d0eea22609
https://wavesexplorer.com/assets/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB

It does not matter what NFT nerds think is valuable/not valuable because you are buying this for a couple hundred k and monetizing $50m on it. The importance is that is 2017 crypto integrated art the execution beyond that is irrelevant simply the fact that this even exists in its pristine incarnation is a small miracle no one in their right mind would try and sell a jpeg in 2017 and even so the art is 6000x9000 pixels and dozens of mb in size which does not fit onchain.

It is the closest deal to a vintage NFT you will find on the market and the price tag is a few hundred k not $100m+ (yet). This project is ticking all the boxes ten times over in $200k bracket. It is a basement bargain for a 2017 certified crypto with any form of image assets attached to it, let alone a complete institutional grade / exhibition ready professionally rendered artworks by a certified artist who was working with six other professional artists since 2018.

The days of speculation that Waves would reach 200$ seem like a distant memory now that so many problems have not been resolved in the last 6 months.

1. Some are old, and some are new, like Power. Some projects are more or less dead.

2. Those are the value of tokens, a single one, and the diluted worth of all existing tokens. A lot of tokens are used more for trading than the utility.

Thanks for sharing this useful link. In fact, I was surprised by the number of applications that were built on Waves, which is nearly 200. I remember only 3-5 were available in the Waves store back to 2017-2018.

I have two notes:
1- How long ago were these applications launched? I mean, are these applications old, or are they newly produced and the old applications stopped?
2- Out of 180 applications, 82 of them have 0 volumes, and some of them are worth less than a few cents or even less.
Do these applications really work and have users other than those who use tokens for trading?

There are still applications developed on Waves, for example, Puzzle or PowerDAO. See https://WavesCap.com sections about DAPPs and Links.

This was one of the projects that sparked my most interest in my early days with crypto. I also remember getting tokens periodically from apps on Wave.
For years I have not heard of major developments on the network, perhaps because developers have moved to other networks that offer better features.

As I remember, one of the most important advantages offered by Ethereum in competition with Wave is its ability to broadcast about 100,000 transactions per second, while Wave can only broadcast 100 transactions. Wave was and still is better than Ethereum in terms of transfer fees by a huge margin.

I would like to know if there are still applications being developed on Wave and if the token will maintain the same stability compared to the most important tokens in the market.

Try this https://wavesexplorer.com/

or this https://w8.io/yourwavesaddress  ( replace "yourwavesaddress" with your waves address  )

What is the website to check your waves balance without checking waves exchange and logging in? 


i remember it was a website where you just enter your waves address and it shows the waves balance and recent transactions with the address?