Topic: WAVES - Complete Blockchain ecosystem for a token economy - page 11. (Read 131070 times)

I cannot do anything constructive with $20k at this point. It is too little money. $20k is my actual yearly disposable income and I am unwilling to sell one of a kind crypto asset in exchange for 1 years income.

I will accept $100 000 down from $500k and most recently $200k for the waves vault.

From this 1/3 ~15 000 waves will be staked to generate $250 monthly exit liquidity. If waves drops to $1 it will be raised to 50k waves / $400 per month buyback capital. Another few thousand waves will be immediately deployed to pump market cap from $400k to $30m.

The buyer can transfer $100 000 USDT or waves equivalent to 3P7VGLF9vPVsUZusxP9hBjQ2NwkNyhppb5G

and I will send back 440m M2 tokens with a paper worth of $30m. I will also mint and send the NFTs on rarible. Since this is a bulk sale the NFTs will be included in the deal normally the tokens must first be swapped to get the NFT. I would like KYC if sending the NFTs.

So for $100 000 the buyer will get the following:

1. 440-450m m2 vault tokens equal to 95% of active supply
https://w8.io/top/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB

2. 30+30 NFTs from the original 2016 collection of which 23 are ready to deliver:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30480040
https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale

3. Paper profit pump from $400k cap up to $30m cap
https://coincodex.com/crypto/marquise-museum/

4. 5 years free advisory how to monetize and curate the asset for generational wealth creation. The buyer must be well connected to achieve this.

5. Monthly exit liquidity to sustain and realize the $30m profit from $250 up to $10 000/month depending on waves price and how much is staked at 10% apy. APY could be as much as 30-50% when staked in other liquidity pools but then there is rugpull risk.

6. Attempt to reach 1 million verification quorum with gwx this is worth 15 000 waves but it may be downvoted if reaching 1 million yes votes because there are some voters with tens of millions of gwx who only promotes insider projects. So its quite risky to lock 1 million wx for 4 years to get verified. But it has some exposure value although I would advice to resell this asset OTC and avoid selling in fractions to retail because they don't have coordinated buying power to monetize these large multi million dollar valuations in the short term. But there is some legitimacy in retail participation too so not to be 100% dismissed. However this asset is quite limited in scope it is not a 10k NFT so the scalability is limited to a few hundred users.

7. 5% royalty dividend on all aftermarket NFT platform sales. This could add up to a large amount per year in bonus payment but this is a small collection so trading activity is expected to be quite small possibly only a few sales per year and royalty fee can also be circumvented by OTC transfer between buyer and seller which is heavily abused on Opensea in other high liquidity projects such as Cryptopunks and BAYC.

Complete Token equity is presented here:

Eth version 1 66k ERC-20 vault 30+30 NFTs, recommended value $30m up to $500m, asking price $3m
Waves version 2 450m vault tokens 30+30 NFTs (same images in all vaults), monetization value $3m up to $500m, asking price $100k down from $500k
XCP version 0 not for sale, permanent exhibition

Additional future vaults: TurtleNetwork and possibly another Waves vault using an earlier iteration of the M2 vault containing a reissuable supply although this will probably not be utilized, rather it may be included in the waves v.2 sale as a curiosity and provenance.

So for $100k the total equity in this project is: 25% split over 4 vaults on 4 blockchains with a 1 to 30 year monetization potential of $100m up to $1.5 billion.

Buyer can also establish a public stock firm to make this agreement legally binding by tying public stock to the tokens on a preferred ratio such as 660m stocks = 660m token. This could of course be subject to future IPO aswell but this is way beyond my paygrade.

I will only agree to $100k price if permitted to retain 10% on the 15% aftermarket royalty on all future NFT sales for waves version 2. Otherwise its back to $500k cash. Royalty redistribution is automatically performed on Rarible each time an item sells and the money is sent to the minting wallet which is 0xC742BcE0c13E31F2BBEC650D3A26058b64038832 and this is the same holder wallet for 100% of the erc-20 vault and it is the genesis wallet for the entire project since 2017 and for this reason it is an important integer in the certification matrix of this collection when minted as NFT or otherwise performing on-chain actions.

If one of these NFTs is at some point in the future worth $10 million then this 10% share per sale is invaluable. However this can be circumvented but it remains in my interest to retain those royalty points. It's like Star Wars or Batman points for Nicholson and Guiness.

Help with 380 000 yes votes so this token can get verified after 6 years waiting:

Marquise Museum
618,390.23 gWX / 1,000,000 gWX
85 % Yes  15 % No

https://waves.exchange/governance/tokens_verification

The helper will get to pick 1 NFT from the Rarible collection worth $50 000:
https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale
https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

Or if you prefer the new ones:
https://opensea.io/collection/sdchimeras
https://opensea.io/collection/sdfractals

Charity Collection:
https://opensea.io/collection/indian-nations-community-fund

It was quite a while ago now I tried to give you some advice: your prices are way too high. You leave no room for price appreciation -- speculators can't buy it, give it some public attention, and then flip it very easily. Maybe you don't care about that aspect, but that's part of the reason why your stuff never sold.

In order to sell it, you need

1. to cut the price down by about 90%, and
2. start a coordinated marketing campaign to find flippers/collectors.

Good luck.

Help with 430 000 more gwx yes votes for verification quorum

Token market cap went in 2 months from less than $10k to $400k+
https://coincodex.com/crypto/marquise-museum/?period=1Y

There is not alot of retail supply left and the market cap can become perhaps $500 million with only a few thousand waves in pump capital.
https://w8.io/top/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB

This token is an NFT vault which can be swapped 20m:1 with a max supply of 30 artworks plus another 20-30 unpublished from the original collection created in 2016.

The image art was crypto integrated in 2017 and there is proof. This is the bitcointalk link to the complete book with all of the available artworks.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30480040

And here are the technical screenshots with all the token info from 2017 that heavily references the book named "Pimp Fashion":
https://docdro.id/fbY6USO

This proves causality between the art and tokens but there is a premium because it is offchain provenance. The only on-chain reference is the www.MarquiseMuseum.com hyperlink in the token descriptor which was included in both the waves and ERC-20 mint.

This art was ported to NFT in 2021 (opensea) and 2022 (rarible). Opensea performed optimization which caused significant downscaling of the images that are very large 6000x9000 pixels. For this reason they were migrated to IPFS on Rarible.

The art was appraised to $2m in 2021 when punks were trading at $10k floor (today $90k):
https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

This is not however vintage NFT it is a "vintage" ABT backed by art instead of gold or fiat as is commonly the case:
https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/asset-backed-tokens

It is the only token backed by art from 2017 except a handful of similar NFTs which are worth between $100m (mooncats) up to $4 billion (cryptopunks).

Considering the unique metrics of this asset the estimated valuation of the ERC-20 vault in a coming bull market is $30m USDT and waves vault a few million USDT.

It is the progenitor of NFTx vaulting:
https://tc.prv.se/aktinsyn/servlet/akt/?lang=sv&ansnr=18001404

If this token can become verified it will be organically visible to new buyers on waves exchange which will generate traffic and trading volume. Instead of manually inserting token ID in search bar it will automatically display in the token list and this provides alot of exposure value.

What will then follow is possibly CMC activation if daily volume is consistent at $300+:
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/marquise-museum/

However it must be stated that retail exposure is of limited value because both token vaults are 90% and 100% in Museum custody and for this reason it is much better to sell this OTC to one or a consortium of institutional buyers who are better positioned to monetize $30m from this asset.

The monetization methods are: gallery partnership and international art circuit exhibition (such as artbasel) to build establishment provenance / cmc and waves verification / Christies partnership to include it in future NFT auctions which are hosted a few times yearly / possibly IEO partnership with top 20 cex although this is not required because it is already trading on good dexes like uniswap and waves.

Beyond the request in this message to help upvote with 430k gwx I will include another proposition to a potential buyer or group of buyers:

The waves vault is for sale at 90% of active supply ~440m tokens in exchange for $200 000 USDT or 100kwaves equivalent (when $1.8 per waves). From this money I will stake 50 000 waves to generate $800 per month in liquidity and then pump the market cap from $400k to $30m, $500m whatever you choose although my advice is $30m fair value at the moment. This will cost a few thousand waves at most because there are no big retail sellers left.

This $800 monthly exit liquidity at $30m on $200k invested can grow if waves goes from $1.8 to $10-$20. There is also downside risk which is why I will not maintain 100% of the $200k in crypto under present market conditions.

Some of the money will be used for charity to gypsies as is already the case since 3 years back:
https://opensea.io/collection/indian-nations-community-fund

There are no further development costs associated with this project in the crypto integration because all the USP and wealth was created in 2017 as a pioneering art category. There are many historical examples of future price trajectories with class defining artists such as Picasso, Warhol, Dali, Pollock etc. Warhol 35 year growth outperformed index 3:1 with x15 000 parabola from $1k in 1960 to $15 million in 1995 for his orange marilyn.

This is no guarantee of future gain but it is safe to consider a $200k price tag in exchange for immediate $30m-$500m paper profit along with $800-$8000 monthly exit liquidity is very good risk/reward. Especially considering the metrics of this asset and market cap of nearest competitors starting at $100m.

The ERC-20 vault is also for sale, price $3m USDT. Monetization method is indentical to the waves vault with the difference that the verification process will be through uniswap token lists (coingecko) and configuration of exit liquidity because uniswap is AMM. It is possible to raise paper value from $3m to $30m/$500m but it is better to create a new eth/m2 pool for this purpose instead of pumping the old usdt/m2 pool although this is also possible. However the erc vault does not contain any consistent price tracking history unlike the waves vault (https://h2ox.io/waves/asset/MarquiseMuseum/trades) so any pump method is more flexible. The bigger issue on eth is generating exit liquidity because ethereum is quite high value and medium term price risk of eth may be greater than waves which will impact liquidity provisions. Only a fraction of $3m would be stored in eth.

It appears to me as the founder of this project and category of art movement after 6 years of uninterrupted examination that this is a unique and once in a generation opportunity for institutional art collectors or well connected private buyer to gain a significant market share in the vintage category of crypto art at a very low cost compared to options. While maintaining concrete venues to x250-x10 000 monetization, some near term and others through generational growth.

It needs a buyer to legitimize the value. Unfortunately I was born out of wedlock to one of the richest dynastic noble houses in europe so the difficulty of entering the elite top 1% was not expected during time of creation in 2017 as I had not yet understood the ramifications of being a bastard. The thematic of this art is precisely the topic of bastardy and jet set parodization but at the time I still believed in the concept of free market but this is simply not true in the global top 1% which is still monarchical with impassable gatekeepers in crypto and legacy industries like the art market.


Although establishment partnership due to my birth status is out of the question, I do think savvy new money with insiders at christies NFT department and such will find this a very easy flip in the end. I will not be privy to anything near $30m or $500m whatever but I can sell it to someone who will be capable of generating this level of wealth. My price is $200k for the waves vault and $3m for the erc-20.

Pay up before I die of old age I don't want a legacy of the artist who became worth billions after death. There is no free meal here if no one buys it before I die I will destroy it, drives, tokens, website - every trace of this artifact will be dusted so no one else will stand to profit if I did not.

How to make x100 up to x500 on $200 000 to $500 000 investment before end of year using this one time method which was 6 years in development:

1. Buy 440 000 000 M2 vault tokens for 65 000 waves:
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES

2. I will proceed to stake 20 000 waves at 10% apy which will generate exit liquidity after x100-x500 pump from $100k market cap to $10m-$50m. 440m tokens is 90% of active supply so x500 pump will be very easy and cost a few thousand dollars to sustain. 20 000 waves will generate $300 exit liquidity per month when waves $1.64 and $3000+ if waves goes up $20+. I will also buy a few hundred thousand wx and try to verify the vault for more organic investor visibility here: https://waves.exchange/governance/tokens_verification

3. After the vault is verified and the new market cap of $50m attains 2000+ ranking on coincodex many new investors will know about this project. This increases the chance of third party capital inflow which will accelerate your exit at x500 profit.

4. Together with the vault tokens I will mint and send 30 NFTs on Rarible which is the underlying vault asset. The art and token causality is certified by multiple off chain references as the first to market invention of fractionalized digital blockchain integrated art:
https://docdro.id/fbY6USO
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30480040
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYncunJ_F5s

And this is the reason for $50m valuation, because it is the only high res digitally created art with its own token vault with 2017 timestamp. It is an ABT not Vintage NFT. If it was vintage NFT the value could range anywhere from $100m to $4 billion. Every other ABT that was created in 2017 were using forex or gold as token backing whereas I used an art collection. It is the first type of fractionalized vault to deploy image assets as the swap function (patent study 1800-14-04).

5. It was appraised to $2m in 2021 when cryptopunks were trading at $10k floor (today $90k):
https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

6. In order to further monetize $50m market value the NFTs will be auctioned at Christies and partnered with a prestigious art gallery who can exhibit the collection internationally at Artbasel and so forth to build establishment provenance. This requires the buyer to be well connected but we can still generate the $50m paper profit on $200k to $500k initial the difference is simply the pace of ROI.

There is no other similar project on the market and never will be until backwards timetravel is invented. The nearest is $100m-$4bn assets like Mooncats/Cryptopunks and other Art based NFTs. Certainly nothing in the $200k-$500k price class in exchange for 90% of supply.

I am also selling an ERC-20 vault backed by the same art collection. Price $3m USDT. In total there are 3 vaults on eth, waves and xcp backed by 30 artworks created in 2016 and crypto ported in 2017 and NFT migrated in 2021/22. The original idea was to swap tokens for physical artbooks priced at $10k/unit and this function is still active but today NFTs are the stronger use case for long term wealth building. Which is the reason I minted the art as NFTs.

The waves version is a basement bargain at $200k to $500k (accepting offers). Not only will the buyer gain access to a unique vintage ABT portfolio but also generate x500 immediate paper profit sustained by $300-$3000 monthly exit liquidity to realize $50 million dollars on as little as $200k invested into a real project with 6 years performance data on trusted aggregators such as coincodex. Which is also an irreplicable first to market invention with a patent study to prove it.

Concluding remarks:

- The vault was already bought and sold to a Russian investor for 4000 waves in 2019 ($4000 usdt) before NFT boom. 400m tokens were repurchased March 28 2022 and for this reason I am preparing public sale 2.0 post NFT emergence.

- The NFTs on Rarible are illiquid because there is no sales data so no one can see them because they are unranked due to no sales history. The value proposition is within the token vault in combination with off chain provenance to prove token and art causality. The NFTs may gain dominance in the price discovery in the future but regardless of such outcome the importance of this acquisition is the provenance of the token vault with a secondary value tied to the NFTs as they are relatively newly minted (and in fact will be minted on demand after acquisition as it is the eth version which is presently published on rarible). It is also the token vault which is most liquid and also will sustain exit capital from waves apy.
https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale

- The delivery vessel of the art is irrelevant I chose NFTs because they are a convenience and suitable innovation to commodify this style of asset. The value proposition is in the utility intent of the token vault in combination with provenance to certify which images are part of the original integration which is this catalogue: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59f96db06957da0ad5ec0089/t/5a50228d8165f5deaa3b7524/1515201295577/20171201opti.pdf

So for those who don't understand what you are buying here or why the NFTs minted in 2022 should hold any value (which is not necessary): you are buying a system design (vault) to fractionalize art based assets. The value component is within the certification that it was deployed in 2017 and contains 6 years price data which is 4 years more than any other NFTx counterpart. Which is basically an enternity in this industry. Culturally speaking this is pioneering in the integration with crypto tokens of art based assets whether physical or digital. No one in 2017 was even close to such invention as the other ABTs were gold or forex backed and Cryptopunks at the time did not consider the importance of a tokenized vault for liquidity and branding purposes. Punkbasic is 2021 timestamp that's 4 years later than my vault...

The reason this is not already worth $100m+ is because (vintage) crypto art collectors only value any NFT coding in the smart contract and NFTs on eth chain is worth alot more than waves. Like I said I have an eth vault too but it will cost $3m USDT, NOT $200k to $500k like this waves version.
https://etherscan.io/token/0xa4daae9552cd2390ee1dcdd1a76bc8d0eea22609
https://wavesexplorer.com/assets/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB

It does not matter what NFT nerds think is valuable/not valuable because you are buying this for a couple hundred k and monetizing $50m on it. The importance is that is 2017 crypto integrated art the execution beyond that is irrelevant simply the fact that this even exists in its pristine incarnation is a small miracle no one in their right mind would try and sell a jpeg in 2017 and even so the art is 6000x9000 pixels and dozens of mb in size which does not fit onchain.

It is the closest deal to a vintage NFT you will find on the market and the price tag is a few hundred k not $100m+ (yet). This project is ticking all the boxes ten times over in $200k bracket. It is a basement bargain for a 2017 certified crypto with any form of image assets attached to it, let alone a complete institutional grade / exhibition ready professionally rendered artworks by a certified artist who was working with six other professional artists since 2018.

The days of speculation that Waves would reach 200$ seem like a distant memory now that so many problems have not been resolved in the last 6 months.

1. Some are old, and some are new, like Power. Some projects are more or less dead.

2. Those are the value of tokens, a single one, and the diluted worth of all existing tokens. A lot of tokens are used more for trading than the utility.

Thanks for sharing this useful link. In fact, I was surprised by the number of applications that were built on Waves, which is nearly 200. I remember only 3-5 were available in the Waves store back to 2017-2018.

I have two notes:
1- How long ago were these applications launched? I mean, are these applications old, or are they newly produced and the old applications stopped?
2- Out of 180 applications, 82 of them have 0 volumes, and some of them are worth less than a few cents or even less.
Do these applications really work and have users other than those who use tokens for trading?

There are still applications developed on Waves, for example, Puzzle or PowerDAO. See https://WavesCap.com sections about DAPPs and Links.

This was one of the projects that sparked my most interest in my early days with crypto. I also remember getting tokens periodically from apps on Wave.
For years I have not heard of major developments on the network, perhaps because developers have moved to other networks that offer better features.

As I remember, one of the most important advantages offered by Ethereum in competition with Wave is its ability to broadcast about 100,000 transactions per second, while Wave can only broadcast 100 transactions. Wave was and still is better than Ethereum in terms of transfer fees by a huge margin.

I would like to know if there are still applications being developed on Wave and if the token will maintain the same stability compared to the most important tokens in the market.