Topic: WAVES - Complete Blockchain ecosystem for a token economy - page 143. (Read 131013 times)

This kind of nonsense truly irritates me. You're just talking out of your arse. Could you provide me with all the information you have that caused you to arrive at the conclusion you did - namely, "HODL! TO THE MOON! WE'LL ALL HAVE LAMBOS SOON!"  

w00t w00t ,

i was waiting for this, i hope this will let the price go higher...

i think one good project and boom......!

Greetings. This is not a donation, but the real burning procedure. All burned assets are deducted from total & circulation supplies and can never be accessed by anyone again.
Answering your question regarding creation such a wallet, there is no such direct opportunity as well as this process has no sense in the frames of token burning as it has a special transaction type of burning and you can always check it by using the official explorer wavesexplorer.com

Sincerely,
Waves Community Manager

---

Don't know why anyone would want to burn their money, but why burn Waves when you can burn the ENTIRE project?

On a separate note, read that EOS raised $4 billion in total - the greed is truly disgusting! Some idiot wrote an article berating investors, saying that they shouldn't complain about their coins not doing well, because it's not a guaranteed thing. Unless, of course, you're a founder - in which case, you're guaranteed riches beyond your wildest dreams for doing nothing whatsoever. Just what incentives do these "crypto-architects" have to make a success of their ventures? They say, necessity is the mother of invention, but when those running a project are filthy rich, they have NO reason to care.

Is this possible to BURN assets and WAVES?
I see there is possible in Ethereum mainnet, just by sending Ether and Tokens to the address: https://etherscan.io/address/0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
There is no any private key from this address, and noone cann't spend funds from this addres.
Is there any option, to burn the tokens and WAVES?
Can you add this in future?
Also, I see some guide about BURN tokens, here,
But I cann't understand is this donate or real burning of the token?
What about total available supply and circulating supply, after burning asset?
Is this values real decreasing?
Also, what about burning the WAVES? Is this possible, or if I want to burn my WAVES, I can send it just for someone, as donate?
Can I generate the Waves Address, without private key from this, to make my WAVES burning, just by sending it there?

P.S.: Yeap, I see tokens are really burning,
and this transactions, are include inside the blocks,
as transactions with special type:
No one is not the receiver of this burned tokens.

WAVES is alright but lately, the price of coins just keeps falling.
I am still holding my bag and I hope you turn out to be right and waves really do take off.

Waves is one project I personally like. I have been investing in it. With its constant development and community updates, it has all the features of a sustainable project. Looking to load a bag before the markets finally take off. Transactions are remarkably fast and cheaper than most blockchains.

Waves DEX - Top 100 Assets & Markets by 24h Volume in USD (Free Google Spreadsheet):
5-min auto update, volume in USD (markets in base volume), RSI12/10m, change per 1h, 4h, 24h and more data...

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_7EZO-70pH5E1PrYyKvwx_5ZwWwYoT-NsHSSADRmBqQ/edit?usp=sharing

+update!

- The first payment will be on the 15th.
- We've already mined about 57 blocks!
- We migrated our node to a server with a configuration between 2x ~ 3x higher to ensure better performance.
- More than 80 people have already activated the leasing by Waves Brazil node!

Who has not activated the rent, will be very welcome to help our node:
3P1xU8QSBk2gDQkepGYu24tTfwj4FgS7avv

If you have any questions, please visit our website, share in our telegram group or look for us privately: Irlan Pierre / Evandro Matias

Thank you all!

I just did import my existing wallet, by writting the base58 of encoded seed in node.conf,
and my address was been added there. This was been checked in node-rest-api. And I see my address there.
So now, I can access to this address, using waves client and waves-lite-client.

Primary synchronization is so slowly, and take 3-4 days. 100 blocks per minute... after 1000000 block...
So I try to using blockchain import, now: http://blockchain.wavesnodes.com/
downloading this tar-archive is more faster. Few hours only.
After downloading, just unpack blocks from this tar-archive to "data", and synchonize the rest blocks from mainnet, then.
Blockchain have size over 25 GB, now.
Is this possible to save only last N-blocks on the node, and free disk space,
or set the limit 1GB for saving last blocks, for example?

Also, what about blockchain forks?
I see here: https://dev.pywaves.org/nodes/
some nodes have blockchain forked at N block.
Is there any consensus about forks?
Is there any node where is exists the actual and longer blockchain?
Is there any override, or forked blockchains is continue there, locally, on this nodes, in decentralized network?
Because, I see, some nodes have forked blockchain, and this nodes are connected - with opened port...
So, if some nodes with forked blockchain have the opened port, why no any blockchain override there,
with replace invalid forked blockchain to actual longer blockchain?

---

P.S.:
After downloading tar-archive with blocks, according this guide, but waves-all-1.0.2.jar tell me an error.
But old version waves-all-0.15.4.jar working normally with this blocks, inside tar-archive.
Maybe there is no backward compatibility, so need to fix this.

---

P.P.S:
I see the node with version v0.15.6 working good with .tar-archive.
But verification of blocks processing after connect to the nodes.
The node with version v0.16.2 ask for rebuild storage.
So, now I'm trying to importing blocks from binary file for node v1.0.2...
Downloading blockchain, according this guide...
After downloading this binary file, I see the verification of blocks is processing locally, without connect to the nodes.
And this verification of blocks - processing more faster.

Bettertokens review board should be dismissed in favor of community voted tokens.

Ticker removal is a backwards move because of 4 letter limitation.

According to Bettertokens my project can't improve the white paper and be approved for qualified status, and it seems it cannot improve white paper and issue a new token that was not publically sold and apply again.

Bettertokens are way too powerful and centralized for new projects to prosper.

Marquise $Museum was in production for 3 years of which 2 in crypto, and now the asset is ready to deliver and we cannot get qualified and instead will lose ticker in december.

An entity like Bettertokens is easy to pusho over by governments such as Russia, who knows where crypto is considered a threat to the status quo, because it is.

It is a very underhanded way of subverting the industry, to place sock puppet gatekeepers everywhere.

There is nothing wrong with my project and two teams in London and America are ready to improve white paper and even send a new un used token for review, but my guess is that Bettertokens will make new rules that prevent indepdent projects that are not on the inside from getting through.

Same with coinmarketcap indexing, they only list their own because it would otherwise rupture status quo.

Look at Bittrex, and that was in America, land of the free.

Waves is a Russian team, what chance do they have against Russian military.

some details:
https://www.criptomonedaseico.com/noticias/fundador-de-waves-vendio-su-participacion-en-proyecto-de-ciudad-i

I see, will look into it. Thanks.

Even if relief comes, I don't think we can come back easily, more accurately, returning perfectly is very unlikely, a loss to some extent is probably what will happen because as you say, the situation is not good for altcoin, especially for old altcoin as waves, the market seems to want to erase its position and help a new altcoin replace. However, I still hope the development team can create a large and long-term event to pull the community back after this collapse, help Waves return to the original

IMHO they have not any problem, having sold their technique recently (see vostok story)

Is this possible to add address from existing seed, and to add it to wallet.dat on the running WAVES FULL NODE?
If yes - how?
I don't see option on NODE REST API...
Just export seed for wallet.dat (long base58 string), and seed for existing address (short base58 string).
This is not seeds with words in "poetry" encoding.

Considering thqt this coin is over 3 years old, how much money does the team have left for development?