Author

Topic: WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform. - page 1784. (Read 2389197 times)

member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
One question about the ICO.

Can I send BTC from an exchange like Coinbase or Poloniex and still be able to claim my waves tokens after the launch?

or do I need to be able to know my BTC private key and must send from BitcoinQT or blockchain wallet?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1041
I hope you won't buy more WAVES before ICO ends and decide to buy from Poloniex after it hit the markets. Cheesy
Everytime you buy WAVES my overall WAVES balance is decreasing and I hate to see it melting.

Now I only have about 350+ Waves, i wish the ICO ends. I'm not buying and i can't buy more since my coins are tied somewhere else too.
So its confirmed that WAVes are going to be released first on Polo?
 
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
I bought Waves two different times during the ICO. I am thinking about getting more Waves before the ICO ends.

 Wink

Funny that we're in a Laffer Curve framework here. Too many BTC means too much dilution, but too few BTC means inadequate development funds in re the plans. I hope we end up near the optimum. Smiley

I think we're past the optimum now. Beyond a certain point increased dev funds do more harm than good, (why work too hard, we're already rich), combine that with IPO investors constantly whining that price is well below ICO, and you have a recipe for disaster.

Ideally what you want is hungry devs who can see the prize ahead, but it's out of reach, and investors supportive and active with the same feeling (the prize of increased marketcap is in sight, but needs time and support to achieve).

With WAVES I can see an avalanche of post ICO negativity as everyone who wants into WAVES will be so up to their balls, so price is heading south, and the devs tolerance for complaints, and hunger for 24/7 startup work ethic will not exist after a few months, as they're already rich.


I agree with the idea that there is probably a "sweet spot" for BTC raised. I liked the quote: "too many BTC means too much dilution, but too few means inadequate development funds." That sums it up well.

You make some really good points to consider. But I'm not sure we're past the optimum now. But we certainly could get there.

The devs to me seem full of ambition and vision. I'm not sure they would be inclined to take things easy just because they are "already rich." I sense they have a lot of integrity and a strong desire to bring their vision to pass. I think they know their reputations are on the line and they will probably push and push until all their goals and dreams are realized. Also, I seem to remember that in order to implement their loftiest visions will require a lot of funds as some of the licenses they seek can be very expensive to obtain. I don't understand this world that well to provide the details, but I'm sure some people could.

I've thought that breaking the 10k BTC milestone would be ideal for this project. It looks almost certain that will happen. I'm not sure we should blast through that to something like 15k or beyond, but there might be hidden benefits to that outcome that I can't see. For me something like 11k BTC would still feel right and good. Past that, I might start to share the concerns you stated so well. Smiley
I would say 10k-15k BTC raised is the sweet spot for ICO's today. Not too much but not too little either. Just right.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
I bought Waves two different times during the ICO. I am thinking about getting more Waves before the ICO ends.

 Wink

Funny that we're in a Laffer Curve framework here. Too many BTC means too much dilution, but too few BTC means inadequate development funds in re the plans. I hope we end up near the optimum. Smiley

I think we're past the optimum now. Beyond a certain point increased dev funds do more harm than good, (why work too hard, we're already rich), combine that with IPO investors constantly whining that price is well below ICO, and you have a recipe for disaster.

Ideally what you want is hungry devs who can see the prize ahead, but it's out of reach, and investors supportive and active with the same feeling (the prize of increased marketcap is in sight, but needs time and support to achieve).

With WAVES I can see an avalanche of post ICO negativity as everyone who wants into WAVES will be so up to their balls, so price is heading south, and the devs tolerance for complaints, and hunger for 24/7 startup work ethic will not exist after a few months, as they're already rich.


I agree with the idea that there is probably a "sweet spot" for BTC raised. I liked the quote: "too many BTC means too much dilution, but too few means inadequate development funds." That sums it up well.

You make some really good points to consider. But I'm not sure we're past the optimum now. But we certainly could get there.

The devs to me seem full of ambition and vision. I'm not sure they would be inclined to take things easy just because they are "already rich." I sense they have a lot of integrity and a strong desire to bring their vision to pass. I think they know their reputations are on the line and they will probably push and push until all their goals and dreams are realized. Also, I seem to remember that in order to implement their loftiest visions will require a lot of funds as some of the licenses they seek can be very expensive to obtain. I don't understand this world that well to provide the details, but I'm sure some people could.

I've thought that breaking the 10k BTC milestone would be ideal for this project. It looks almost certain that will happen. I'm not sure we should blast through that to something like 15k or beyond, but there might be hidden benefits to that outcome that I can't see. For me something like 11k BTC would still feel right and good. Past that, I might start to share the concerns you stated so well. Smiley
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
I bought Waves two different times during the ICO. I am thinking about getting more Waves before the ICO ends.

 Wink

Funny that we're in a Laffer Curve framework here. Too many BTC means too much dilution, but too few BTC means inadequate development funds in re the plans. I hope we end up near the optimum. Smiley

I think we're past the optimum now. Beyond a certain point increased dev funds do more harm than good, (why work too hard, we're already rich), combine that with IPO investors constantly whining that price is well below ICO, and you have a recipe for disaster.

Ideally what you want is hungry devs who can see the prize ahead, but it's out of reach, and investors supportive and active with the same feeling (the prize of increased marketcap is in sight, but needs time and support to achieve).

With WAVES I can see an avalanche of post ICO negativity as everyone who wants into WAVES will be so up to their balls, so price is heading south, and the devs tolerance for complaints, and hunger for 24/7 startup work ethic will not exist after a few months, as they're already rich.
sr. member
Activity: 1936
Merit: 290
Looks like Mycellium ICO has broken $2m mark (4,562.988 BTC) - and still 7 hrs to go.  Good news for them but also good news for Waves.

I think the Mycellium partnership is what differentiates this ICO from others.  Mycellium isn't going anywhere...they're a staple of the BTC community.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Looks like Mycellium ICO has broken $2m mark (4,562.988 BTC) - and still 7 hrs to go.  Good news for them but also good news for Waves.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Might be you don't have the right combination of letters, case, symbols, numbers etc.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
when I try to set my password it says that it must be 8 characters at least, and I'm at like 16 characters.  Something is wrong.  It don't like my 16 character password
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1000
How long after entering your email should you be receiving an email to buy Waves ICO?

I've tried entering 2 different emails into the ICO site, and nothing has happened for hours.

Is there another way to buy these before launch besides inputting your email into the ICO site, or should I just wait until after launch and the tokens hit the exchanges?

After you enter your email and set your password, you should be logged in at once. Next you should receive confirmation email.

If you used those emails in first day while procedure was being updated please use new one or write to [email protected] for help.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
How long after entering your email should you be receiving an email to buy Waves ICO?

I've tried entering 2 different emails into the ICO site, and nothing has happened for hours.

Is there another way to buy these before launch besides inputting your email into the ICO site, or should I just wait until after launch and the tokens hit the exchanges?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Interesting analysis I just wanted to point out too that the opening prices at start on exchanges are not the same that ICO maybe that's the main reason why so abrupt momentary drop.
As far as I am aware only Factom dropped slightly below its ICO price and it was for a day or few only and on a very low volume.
Conclusion-you rarely  get a better deal then on a coins ICO price.  

So it seems, I guess that  coins owners set his buy wall at least to ICO price to protect investors of the initial fluctuation.

legendary
Activity: 1863
Merit: 1020
I hope you won't buy more WAVES before ICO ends and decide to buy from Poloniex after it hit the markets. Cheesy
Everytime you buy WAVES my overall WAVES balance is decreasing and I hate to see it melting.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
BIG AIRDROP: t.me/otppaychat
Interesting analysis I just wanted to point out too that the opening prices at start on exchanges are not the same that ICO maybe that's the main reason why so abrupt momentary drop.
As far as I am aware only Factom dropped slightly below its ICO price and it was for a day or few only and on a very low volume.
Conclusion-you rarely  get a better deal then on a coins ICO price. 
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
I bought Waves two different times during the ICO. I am thinking about getting more Waves before the ICO ends.

 Wink

So am I, seriously. Tho' in my case, it isn't enough for me to run the Red Queen's Race. Only in this situation, funnily enough, the Red Queen's Race makes sense because lower WAVES per BTC --> more development funds.

Funny that we're in a Laffer Curve framework here. Too many BTC means too much dilution, but too few BTC means inadequate development funds in re the plans. I hope we end up near the optimum. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1291
Merit: 1000
Thanks for clarifying this, much appreciated.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Interesting analysis I just wanted to point out too that the opening prices at start on exchanges are not the same that ICO maybe that's the main reason why so abrupt momentary drop.
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
I have decided to join the signature campaign of this coin, what should I do after I have put the sig in my profile ?

Complete this form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1aCjm9sekB3wBRYB_iCvwgUi0QPP9TfJwEz9mlqS5er8/viewform

And write 50 posts before the ICO ends.

You may check your status here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RO52N5rh0-vu1DDzlBYdPjgq6w0YgmrKnJP6I8Nphfg/edit

Jeez Louise: I had 3505 posts when I signed up on March 25th and now I have 4037 posts. The funny thing is, none of those posts were made with the intention of upping my postcount; I was just being my chatty self.

Go Waves!
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM


FACT: The coin price of largest ICOs has dropped by 60% on average upon launch on exchanges.

Conclusion: Skip buying WAVES ICO and buy cheap WAVES after it launches on exchanges in next 2 to 3 weeks












 I've looked at first chart(Etherium) and that is what I've found.
At the  given time frame ETH price range was from 0.01 BTC to 0.0024 BTC .
BTC price range at that very time was :278$  to 263$
So, 0.0024x263=0.63$
And ETH ICO price was 0.30$
In other words price  Etherium  never was lower then  its ICO price.
I didn't check other coins charts provided though but there is a reason to think they are going to be incorrect too.

PS. Lowes ET went was on October 21/2015  and it was  0.41$

The opening prices are 100% fake always on almost every coin, not only ICOs.

Someone buys 0.05 BTC worth of the given coin for like 1 BTC / COIN (or some random very high rate).

The charts linked are all bullshit.
Jump to: