Pages:
Author

Topic: [WDC] Worldcoin | 3.0 Flirtatious Ant Released! | Multicoin architecture - page 82. (Read 442449 times)

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Is the block chain available for download, rather than waiting for the wallet to do it.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Check out the Worldcoin translation project here  http://translate.worldcoinfoundation.org/
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
I can tell you right now that I would hesitate to use a 3rd party to handle all transactions. Why pay the fees and give up anonymity for a little convenience. Sort of defeats the purpose of cypto's to begin with. Although I can see 3rd party being used for petty transactions like coffee or fast food where even 1 minute is too long to wait.

Retailers usually don't have a choice.

They support whatever payment methods they have to attract customers. If the choice is between paying a 2% transaction fee or loosing 10% of your customers then they pay the 2% fee. On the other hand, they could start to offer discounts for crypto currency payments handled by one of the crypto-payment processors like Bitpay, Coinbase or Scharmbeck.

In that case, we could see a gradual migration to crypto-currency transactions and away from the traditional payment processors, at which point Visa and Mastercard etc will simply start making corporate acquisitions of crypto-currency payment processors and support those type of payments in addition to their existing services.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
I hate pool spam as much as the next guy. But ours is different but lacking miners, so please give it a go!

https://wdc.hash.so/

* EU and US stratum servers!
* 0% pool fee!
* vardiff
* PPLNS
* Fast servers
* Professional server admin (no downtime)

Point your miners at:
stratum+tcp://pool-eu.hash.so:1337/
stratum+tcp://pool-us.hash.so:1337/

And switch the coin from the frontend. It's very nice, you will like it Smiley

Pool support thread here
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
If we ever get to the point where the blockchain can't handle it what will WDC be worth at that point? and how great is the incentive at that point to solve the problem?

There will be no incentive because there won't be a problem. The blockchain is not a cash register and will never be used en-masse to support point of sale payments in any crypto currency. That isn't it's purpose.

So whether a coin has a 30 second or 10 minute transaction time is irrelevant to it's suitability for use at the point of sale in a retail (in shop or online) environment.


I can tell you right now that I would hesitate to use a 3rd party to handle all transactions. Why pay the fees and give up anonymity for a little convenience. Sort of defeats the purpose of cypto's to begin with. Although I can see 3rd party being used for petty transactions like coffee or fast food where even 1 minute is too long to wait.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
If we ever get to the point where the blockchain can't handle it what will WDC be worth at that point? and how great is the incentive at that point to solve the problem?

There will be no incentive because there won't be a problem. The blockchain is not a cash register and will never be used en-masse to support point of sale payments in any crypto currency. That isn't it's purpose.

So whether a coin has a 30 second or 10 minute transaction time is irrelevant to it's suitability for use at the point of sale in a retail (in shop or online) environment.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Can I get a source on that?

The source is between your ears  Wink

It is a theoretical problem though.

It is like saying when I make millions on WDC I will have lots of taxes to pay.....  What a great problem to have!

If we ever get to the point where the blockchain can't handle it what will WDC be worth at that point? and how great is the incentive at that point to solve the problem?

I am not going to either discard or adopt a coin just because it could have a flaw or came up with a solution to a problem that doesn't exist yet. For example QRK. 5 levels of encryption great! Has anyone broken the encryption on other coins yet? Nope.

I am looking for real results right now. Not some promise that in the future our coin will be better. BTC has proven that a coin doesn't have to be technically superior to have superior value.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
Can I get a source on that?

The source is between your ears  Wink
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Can you imagine today's crypto currency exchanges clearing every trade through the blockchain in realtime ? They'd grind to a muddy halt, even with 30 second transaction times.

Can I get a source on that?
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
.... sorry for rambling, but just one last thing (before I depress anybody too much  Smiley  ).

Although I've made a lot of challenges in the last posts, these are just my opinions. The whole cryptocurrency stage is uncharted waters and there's a huge amount of experimenting to be done. If people really feel that a currency can be "branded" in the way the Worldcoin is trying to do (i.e. a semi-proprietary infrastructure as opposed to just having a loose 'theme' like Earthcoin, say, and then slamming it on all the exchanges) then obviously there may be ways to overcome the issues I've outlined.

Everybody's got different priorities and visions and nobody knows the future, least of all me. I raise these issues out of a genuine curiosity and process of discovery to try to get to the core of what's interesting about a coin and what may give it value. I think the challenges I've raised are real ones though.
member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10

Normal people see that.
Worldcoin isn't inventive as a coin, itself. It is the developers and community around it that is unique.
There is a non-stop, sustained push to bring this coin to the mainstream. Not just for value, in its own right, but for implementation of a crypto-currency as an usable currency void of some of the downfalls of bitcoin.
I think everybody involved should be proud.


Well said. This "There is a non-stop, sustained push to bring this coin to the mainstream. Not just for value, in its own right, but for implementation of a crypto-currency as an usable currency void of some of the downfalls of bitcoin" is the part you should focus on when choosing a coin imo. And how can you even compare this coin to "Quark coin" which did NOTHING in the last two months...glad I sold mine at 0.25$ and invested in WDC.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
I'm not sure about this. One of the things that makes cryptocurrencies popular is their decentralisation. If we end up storing our cryptos on payment processors they'll basically be banks and we might as well have stuck with the old currencies. People want to be able to use cryptos the same way they use cash and speed (without trusting a payment processor) is important for that

I don't think you fully appreciate how a retail environment works. There are several clearing stages between a supermarket cashpoint and a bank account. When you swipe your card at the retailer, it isn't communicating directly with your bank account, it's communicating with a till which may buffer the transaction to allow the retailer to reverse it or adjust it before finally comminting it. Then it goes to a clearing house like Visa which buffers it again and eventually it hits your bank account (by which time you're already home).

Just because we use the blockchain as the permanent 'parking ground' for our funds doesn't mean that the payment processing industry won't still be needed to clear transactions at the point of sale. Can you imagine today's crypto currency exchanges clearing every trade through the blockchain in realtime ? They'd grind to a muddy halt, even with 30 second transaction times. Instead we "charge" our exchange accounts with crypto in a single blockchain transaction, then do lots of trading, then we use a single blockchain transaction to withdraw our balance to cold storage when finished.

This is how it will work in a retail economy as well. You'll "charge" your Visa account with crypto in a single blockchain transaction, (or be credited with it if its a credit and not a debit card), then go to the shops with your card. Transactions will be instantaneous.

Crypto's may make banks redundant but they won't make payment processors redundant. A payment processor and a bank are 2 different things.

Quote
Why can't Scharmbeck be the new Visa or Mastercard?

Because to do that it would have to support all major cryptocurrencies as well as Fiat currencies at the point of sale. No payment processor is aligned with a single currency because they'd be uncompetitive and go out of business very quickly.

Quote
You think Bitcoin will stick around because they can implement defence against a 51% such as checkpoints or perhaps something we haven't dreamed up yet. Why can't Worldcoin do the same?

Yes, they could do and I'm sure any PoW coin could have anti-51% measures boilerplated on. The point I was making was that competitors and "serious seconds" to Bitcoin are more likely to have modern, forward looking designs from the ground up rather than boiler-plated last generation technology.

Quote
I guess you're holding Bitcoin and have decided you don't like Worldcoin and are therefore biased....I think it's clear that you've decided you don't like Worldcoin and then have started looking for reasons to support that viewpoint

I've held about 10 different coins from one time to another, including WDC. In fact I still have about 400 WDC. I'm not trying to troll it, I just think that these forums are about having honest discussions about the relative merits of coin properties. I accept that there are people who work very hard to develop and promote one thing or another but I think I've stuck to making relevant technical and commercial points rather than empty attacks. People are spending serious money on these things and are more interested in an informative exchange than feeling warm and fuzzy (I hope !  Smiley  )

I think Worldcoin should be seen for what it is - a brand. If people want to buy into a brand then fair enough, everybody has different investment priorities. My point is that I don't think you can create a brand out of a currency. The two things have conflicting priorities as I outlined in my last post.

hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 500
So now that the "Scharmbeck is a scam" angle is falling apart because they can no longer deny the implementation of it, the FUD pushers are switching over to other scare tactics.

Give it a rest guys

The continual attacks against WDC by people who decided to invest heavily in other coins and now regret it is getting old.

Normal people see that.
Worldcoin isn't inventive as a coin, itself. It is the developers and community around it that is unique.
There is a non-stop, sustained push to bring this coin to the mainstream. Not just for value, in its own right, but for implementation of a crypto-currency as an usable currency void of some of the downfalls of bitcoin.
I think everybody involved should be proud.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
So now that the "Scharmbeck is a scam" angle is falling apart because they can no longer deny the implementation of it, the FUD pushers are switching over to other scare tactics.

Give it a rest guys

The continual attacks against WDC by people who decided to invest heavily in other coins and now regret it is getting old.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
[1] - One of WDC's main 'selling' properties that's always touted is speed. But this is just blockchain transaction speed. In a point of sale situation, payments are handled by payment processors through accounts. Look at cryptocurrency exchanges for example - all trades happen instantaneously regardless of a coin's particular blockchain transaction speed. I've said this often on other forums, but if a crypto coin ever makes it into a grocery store or supermarket, we *won't* be doing blockchain transactions, we'll be using payment processors like Visa and Mastercard and transactions will all be instantaneous. A few minutes is fine for blockchain speed.
I'm not sure about this. One of the things that makes cryptocurrencies popular is their decentralisation. If we end up storing our cryptos on payment processors they'll basically be banks and we might as well have stuck with the old currencies. People want to be able to use cryptos the same way they use cash and speed (without trusting a payment processor) is important for that.

Quote
[2] - Look at the date on this link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wdc-worldcoin-30-flirtatious-ant-released-multicoin-architecture-204894   When that announcement was made, about 40 of the alt's on the market today didn't exist. A new 'alt' was quite a big deal. Now it isn't. You can even roll your own...http://coingen.io/  Want a fast coin ? - just set the right parameters and have it delivered to your email box.
This isn't really a problem. You could apply this to literally any coin. There are a bunch of coins that have copied and "improved" on Peercoin's PoW/PoS hybrid but that doesn't really hurt Peercoin.

Quote
[3] - Proof of work is toast. It's now emerging that the previously "theoretical" concept of a 51% attack brought about by excessive concentration of hashing power is now a practical reality due to the phenomenon of massive hashing pools and mining viruses that can hijack millions of browsers. Proof of stake is the future because it's almost immune to this particular problem. (Doesn't mean there aren't other issues, but not this one). So that leaves PPC, XPM, NXT and such like as the contenders for challenging bitcoin. It's unlikely that Bitcoin itself will die because it's so established that the developers will find ways to defend against the 51%, like checkpoints etc. But second place downwards is going to go to proof of stake coins IMO.
I agree with some of this. A 51% attack is becoming more likely these days. However there is a logical inconsistency. You think Bitcoin will stick around because they can implement defence against a 51% such as checkpoints or perhaps something we haven't dreamed up yet. Why can't Worldcoin do the same? I guess you're holding Bitcoin and have decided you don't like Worldcoin and are therefore biased.

Quote
[4] - Have a look at what Scharmbeck actually does. Basically 3 things:

a) - a fiat exchange
b) - a client (secret mobile WDC clients)
c) - a payment processor

Talk about playing to your weaknesses:

regarding a) a fiat exchange that only supports one coin vs fiat exchanges that support many
If you hang out in the Worldcoin community you'll notice that they're keen to establish Worldcoin as a standalone currency instead of just another crypto. For example, they pay attention to the WDC/USD or WSD/EUR value where most other coins pay attention to the COIN/BTC value. Given this attitude, it makes sense to have a financial service focused on Worldcoin instead of just another add-any-random-coin-that-can-make-us-money exchange.

Quote
regarding b) ok, it might be a nice client, but a good client doesn't sell a coin, besides, there probably could not be a more competitive area right now

regarding c) as I said previously, if anybody is going to be doing payment processing in any significant way for cryptocurrencies, it will be existing people - Visa, Mastercard, Maestro, the banks etc. They already have an infrastructure that's currency independent, so adding a cryptocurrency will be peanuts if they think it's worth it.
Why can't Scharmbeck be the new Visa or Mastercard? In the early days of Google you'd be telling them they have no chance because other search engines are already established.

I think it's clear that you've decided you don't like Worldcoin and then have started looking for reasons to support that viewpoint. Heck, if the things you listed are Worldcoin's biggest problems, the future looks like pretty smooth sailing to me.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
What happened to the price? Seriously. People in the automated pools are dumping coins so much. This coin is in the brink of collapse.

#11 on coinmarketcap.com and $0.38 per coin

Overdramatize much?


#8 on cryptmarketcap.com Wink
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0

Yes. I'll give you that.

You wouldn't want a silly name like Google, Twitter, Bitcoin, Peercoin or Apple.

The name "Worldcoin" actually tells people what the coin's for so it may still be successful   Wink



LOL @ putting Peercoin up with Google, Twitter and Apple. Fanboy.
Pages:
Jump to: