WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested - page 29.

lightlord

donator

Activity: 3228

Merit: 1226

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: koshgel on January 27, 2015, 05:36:30 PM

Wow...I would expect a member of your age to know better about ponzis...

During a game, sending over the Limit/Under, it counts as a donation, but there was zero game running. With a text on the site saying
the script is gonna be updated by Tuesday. Wasn't even in a day. So this is outside of a game.

He has in the past refunded everyone during the IPN service offline, when the site went offline 10 mins before the game start.

koshgel

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1001

Quote from: lightlord on January 27, 2015, 05:34:59 PM

Can't seem to reach OP by email, when does OP normally check his email?

TXID: https://blockchain.info/tx/4d8f9c94438fff0863e48d9961dd5126bc03023bce8b80f324be0f455f440c28
TXID: https://blockchain.info/tx/6c958ebad0a707721847b09aeaaefa98db2466ca4ebe86a2ba49f250557643e9

I had sent 2 BTC on Jan 24 2015, when a game wasn't even running to 124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp
1 BTC from each address. Now in the rules if a game is running and you send on lets say Day 4 1 sec before Day 5,
yes that is fair if it counts as a donation/loss as that's the game.

But when I checked the site it says the game is offline to Jan 27 Tuesday, so I sent to a non existence game.
It isn't very fair for OP to accept these as a donation, since its outside of a game.
Didn't he refunded everyone during an IPN service offline, 10 mins before a game once?

I tried contacting OP by email but gotten zero response so far.

Wow...I would expect a member of your age to know better about ponzis...

lightlord

donator

Activity: 3228

Merit: 1226

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Can't seem to reach OP by email, when does OP normally check his email?

TXID: https://blockchain.info/tx/4d8f9c94438fff0863e48d9961dd5126bc03023bce8b80f324be0f455f440c28
TXID: https://blockchain.info/tx/6c958ebad0a707721847b09aeaaefa98db2466ca4ebe86a2ba49f250557643e9

I had sent 2 BTC on Jan 24 2015, when a game wasn't even running to 124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp
1 BTC from each address. Now in the rules if a game is running and you send on lets say Day 4 1 sec before Day 5,
yes that is fair if it counts as a donation/loss as that's the game.

But when I checked the site it says the game is offline to Jan 27 Tuesday, so I sent to a non existence game.
It isn't very fair for OP to accept these as a donation, since its outside of a game.
Didn't he refunded everyone during an IPN service offline, 10 mins before a game once?

I tried contacting OP by email but gotten zero response so far.

If all at possible OP, I would like a refund of 1 BTC to each of 17DXeuUgRXoxGQoAhktmsumuXtpu8yD56r & 1HWcXL85DEEfnGTpgkPPWKAeFSWmFAcySK

sethminer14

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: james.lent on January 27, 2015, 10:14:19 AM

Quote from: brizio71 on January 27, 2015, 10:13:09 AM

Quote from: james.lent on January 27, 2015, 10:03:46 AM

It's always gonna be early for someone somewhere mate .

Yes but look the poll!

2300 gmt will be too early for me Tongue

Yeah me too dang it... Embarrassed

Dilemma

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: ticoti on January 27, 2015, 12:11:51 PM

unless you have automatised sending transactions this is a sure loss

if you look a at all the paid transactions they have been done at 00:00:XX time.

i think this is a record life for this kind of ponzi

allright if it is still paying

noma

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hey guys you can join new ponzi here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/maxponzi-120-profit-return-938095

That is another scam waiting to happen. Not a lot of people are stupid to fall and invest in ponzis, after losing a lot of money in them.

ticoti

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

unless you have automatised sending transactions this is a sure loss

if you look a at all the paid transactions they have been done at 00:00:XX time.

brizio71

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Blockchain Just Entered The Real World

What's happen to OP I wrote him some tweet since yesterday on twetter and he never aswer !!!

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: brizio71 on January 27, 2015, 10:13:09 AM

Quote from: james.lent on January 27, 2015, 10:03:46 AM

It's always gonna be early for someone somewhere mate .

Yes but look the poll!

2300 gmt will be too early for me Tongue

brizio71

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Blockchain Just Entered The Real World

Quote from: james.lent on January 27, 2015, 10:03:46 AM

It's always gonna be early for someone somewhere mate .

Yes but look the poll!

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

It's always gonna be early for someone somewhere mate .

everlast25

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Quote from: james.lent on January 27, 2015, 07:54:47 AM

i think from blockchain everything is in order, but listings on site is a lil messed up.
anyone playing tomorrow?

I will If op change his schedule to a bit earlier one (e.g. 23:00 or at least 00:00)
01:00 here in Europe is too late for me.

Also I'm not only one with that problem according this poll http://strawpoll.me/3492663

https://i.imgur.com/Kny4976.jpg

bloodyboy

full member

Activity: 199

Merit: 100

Quote from: everlast25 on January 27, 2015, 07:53:42 AM

Quote from: bloodyboy on January 27, 2015, 07:00:24 AM

For example:
https://blockchain.info/tx/9330cd36858d969c52b0b5a713df7931403ab58f5a53f2f78412410923c67954 - Pending
https://blockchain.info/tx/c3c5ac92f909f6a3428f40b9053e24098aa5aca3bb128e9166eb703613dd75a6 - Paid

How this can be valid? Undecided

Look closely at:
1. Number and amount of transactions.
2. Timestamp at blockchain.
3. Received and paid transactions at blockchain.

There is not much deposits at day#7. That big 1.499 BTC deposit was at 01:00:01, and according to small number of transactions it was a bit late.

Also, script didn't take that 1,5 btc deposit from 1Ce3B56MJfWP73676ZSfsTRVNeVfq5tmhD into consideration because it was too early.

I've looked really closely and I see this:
TX: 9330cd36858d969c52b0b5a713df7931403ab58f5a53f2f78412410923c67954 Time: 2015-01-27 01:00:01 Confirmations: 73 Status: Pending?
TX: c3c5ac92f909f6a3428f40b9053e24098aa5aca3bb128e9166eb703613dd75a6 Time: 2015-01-27 01:00:02 Confirmations: 73 Status: Paid
TX: da40eaac6e051632135499c8680e209769ceb6cf3ff3cf41eef3b0313e4517bf Time: 2015-01-27 01:00:02 Confirmations: 73 Status: Pending?
TX: 4b50a0481c06bd22c94e9cdcf8c6354a3499e963fd02b9362cd05664d47e643d Time: 2015-01-27 01:00:05 Confirmations: 73 Status: Paid
.
.
.

where is the logic...?

Dennis7777

hero member

Activity: 640

Merit: 500