WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested - page 78.

bitcoinpuddle

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Quote from: tom14cat14 on January 17, 2015, 07:53:40 PM

Quote from: dyask on January 17, 2015, 07:50:58 PM

Quote from: everlast25 on January 17, 2015, 07:46:43 PM

Do 23:59:59 transactions also in game??

I seriously think a very hard line should be drawn. Otherwise it just isn't fair. Counting a donation is pretty harsh, but maybe a refund wouldn't be so bad. But either one should be done.

I am mixed on this. At first I said it should be a donation. Now I am not sure. The rules clearly state it will be a donation. So that part makes me want him to follow the rules to the T. We want him to follow them when it pertains to him so we should when it pertains to us. However if there is some difference between what blockcahin says for time and what his game time then I think we should not punish those that used his game and not block chains time.

are we looking at the timer of the site or block chains?

because the rules state (Attention! 24HourPonzi will launch when the timer hits 0. Do not deposit until Day #1 or you will lose your deposit.)

again the timer hit 0 when I sent it.

tom14cat14

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Quote from: everlast25 on January 17, 2015, 07:53:37 PM

Quote from: traxx187 on January 17, 2015, 07:41:16 PM

whats wrong with weekly??

Everyone is playing 24hourponzi now!

Only for a short time I am sure.

bitcoinpuddle

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Quote from: dyask on January 17, 2015, 07:50:58 PM

Quote from: everlast25 on January 17, 2015, 07:46:43 PM

Do 23:59:59 transactions also in game??

I seriously think a very hard line should be drawn. Otherwise it just isn't fair. Counting a donation is pretty harsh, but maybe a refund wouldn't be so bad. But either one should be done.

are we looking at the timer of the site or block chains?

because the rules state (Attention! 24HourPonzi will launch when the timer hits 0. Do not deposit until Day #1 or you will lose your deposit.)

again the timer hit 0 when I sent it.

btcponzi.me

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Something is wrong here.
I started transfering 5 seconds after 01.00am here and after countdown expired on website, and here is the proof.

http://www.btcponzi.me/payment.gif

But blockchin says it was 5 seconds before:
4bcdb4ce7030f2abec69afd42cb97ca0806bc79c68f04a7dea80b0c38d0e4525 2015-01-17 23:59:55
1229CbDaM7REgkpu9jYUXwHy2xEyHtaFeB--124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp 0.5 BTC

That means I have lost my money?
I think thats NO JUST. If OP doesnt want to pay us, just make a refund. Was not my fault. I have waited.
Thanks.

tom14cat14

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Quote from: dyask on January 17, 2015, 07:50:58 PM

Quote from: everlast25 on January 17, 2015, 07:46:43 PM

Do 23:59:59 transactions also in game??

I seriously think a very hard line should be drawn. Otherwise it just isn't fair. Counting a donation is pretty harsh, but maybe a refund wouldn't be so bad. But either one should be done.

I am mixed on this. At first I said it should be a donation. Now I am not sure. The rules clearly state it will be a donation. So that part makes me want him to follow the rules to the T. We want him to follow them when it pertains to him so we should when it pertains to us. However if there is some difference between what blockcahin says for time and what his game time then I think we should not punish those that used his game and not block chains time.

everlast25

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Quote from: traxx187 on January 17, 2015, 07:41:16 PM

whats wrong with weekly??

Everyone is playing 24hourponzi now!

john38474

full member

Activity: 231

Merit: 100

Quote from: Spjer on January 17, 2015, 07:52:03 PM

Quote from: tom14cat14 on January 17, 2015, 07:50:24 PM

Quote from: Rmcdermott927 on January 17, 2015, 07:49:19 PM

OP: You didnt take this as a donation right?

https://blockchain.info/tx/a1dcdcb499e764fc6b464fdcbc420a9d77412e26e78c7a04928d8e699cac9d3b

I think you are safe. He was taking those before 00 utc. I think he even allowed 1 sec of error.

The question for me is, what he does with people and their 8 secs of error...
To keep them as donation would not be fair!!
Definelty not!

its not an error! It was greed to get in early. Tongue

It should be donations! Thats the rule clearly on the website!

rfcdejong

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 500

Quote from: dyask on January 17, 2015, 07:50:58 PM

Quote from: everlast25 on January 17, 2015, 07:46:43 PM

Do 23:59:59 transactions also in game??

I seriously think a very hard line should be drawn. Otherwise it just isn't fair. Counting a donation is pretty harsh, but maybe a refund wouldn't be so bad. But either one should be done.

Refund 1% less foreach second too early should be fair, or start at 90% and lower it 1% foreach second..

i'm in i think, but only played with less than 0.1

bitcoinpuddle

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Quote from: everlast25 on January 17, 2015, 07:46:43 PM

Do 23:59:59 transactions also in game??

Attention! 24HourPonzi will launch when the timer hits 0. Do not deposit until Day #1 or you will lose your deposit.

Timer hit 0 when I sent it.

Fairbanks

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: dyask on January 17, 2015, 07:50:58 PM

Quote from: everlast25 on January 17, 2015, 07:46:43 PM

Do 23:59:59 transactions also in game??

I seriously think a very hard line should be drawn. Otherwise it just isn't fair. Counting a donation is pretty harsh, but maybe a refund wouldn't be so bad. But either one should be done.

Maybe a refund minus the 5% fee?

Spjer

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

Quote from: tom14cat14 on January 17, 2015, 07:50:24 PM

Quote from: Rmcdermott927 on January 17, 2015, 07:49:19 PM

OP: You didnt take this as a donation right?

https://blockchain.info/tx/a1dcdcb499e764fc6b464fdcbc420a9d77412e26e78c7a04928d8e699cac9d3b

I think you are safe. He was taking those before 00 utc. I think he even allowed 1 sec of error.

The question for me is, what he does with people and their 8 secs of error...
To keep them as donation would not be fair!!
Definelty not!

tom14cat14

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Quote from: bitcoinpuddle on January 17, 2015, 07:50:21 PM

Quote from: tom14cat14 on January 17, 2015, 07:47:49 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

seems the address 13owojW2yGUE1wjHNDfCiAD6yP85onjMhC was 1 second too early, but it is shown on the site list

I wonder if game vs blockchain is off. I saw more then just those show before the game started. It might be the 3 btc in the donation address. The ones that are showing on the site might be early by the blockchain but not the OP sites. Only a guess though.

I was looking on the site when i sent it and it hit 0.

Has yours been removed from the site? Or are you the :59

dyask

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 510

Quote from: everlast25 on January 17, 2015, 07:46:43 PM

Do 23:59:59 transactions also in game??

I seriously think a very hard line should be drawn. Otherwise it just isn't fair. Counting a donation is pretty harsh, but maybe a refund wouldn't be so bad. But either one should be done.

tom14cat14

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Quote from: Rmcdermott927 on January 17, 2015, 07:49:19 PM

OP: You didnt take this as a donation right?

https://blockchain.info/tx/a1dcdcb499e764fc6b464fdcbc420a9d77412e26e78c7a04928d8e699cac9d3b

I think you are safe. He was taking those before 00 utc. I think he even allowed 1 sec of error.

bitcoinpuddle

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Quote from: tom14cat14 on January 17, 2015, 07:47:49 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

seems the address 13owojW2yGUE1wjHNDfCiAD6yP85onjMhC was 1 second too early, but it is shown on the site list

I wonder if game vs blockchain is off. I saw more then just those show before the game started. It might be the 3 btc in the donation address. The ones that are showing on the site might be early by the blockchain but not the OP sites. Only a guess though.

I was looking on the site when i sent it and it hit 0.

Rmcdermott927

legendary

Activity: 2254

Merit: 1140

OP: You didnt take this as a donation right?

https://blockchain.info/tx/a1dcdcb499e764fc6b464fdcbc420a9d77412e26e78c7a04928d8e699cac9d3b

tom14cat14

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

seems the address 13owojW2yGUE1wjHNDfCiAD6yP85onjMhC was 1 second too early, but it is shown on the site list

I wonder if game vs blockchain is off. I saw more then just those show before the game started. It might be the 3 btc in the donation address. The ones that are showing on the site might be early by the blockchain but not the OP sites. Only a guess though.

everlast25

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Do 23:59:59 transactions also in game??

tom14cat14

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Quote from: john38474 on January 17, 2015, 07:32:40 PM

OP took it as donation https://blockchain.info/address/1DonatjhWqYZNQYsxR5h1CyrQKxDXWKsUa

Excellent!

PS: Im definitely in right? https://blockchain.info/tx/a7c255e71af79800af8c2f0a277b220a2da54bdcc7dca414a3787fad8651701b

I would think so. Nothing shows you before.

dyask

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 510

Quote from: Fairbanks on January 17, 2015, 07:43:13 PM

Quote from: dyask on January 17, 2015, 07:38:36 PM

If you did that then the receive time would be closer to 00:01:00, the website was almost a full minute behind. A suppose it is possible that different people saw different countdowns depending on how it was built. Still you could have also checked UTC time and saw you were sending before 0:00:00.

The website timer is probably a little flash or javascript timer. It's not really running on the site - it's running locally on everyone's computer and it very definitely drifts; the longer you have the page open, the more it drifts.

The only time that can be trusted for this is the timestamp on the blockchain.info page for that address. That's the timer that I used.

Fair point. That is why the time should actually be stated too.

Topic: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested - page 78. (Read 115086 times)