Topic: We're Allowing TOO Much! It's gone too far with Lauda. (Read 1841 times)

^^^
pretty sure this is what insanity looks like when on display in text form.

Not insanity, just a bit delusional and closed-minded.

The above post by nutildah is another typical example of someone who is completely untrustworthy, who by HIS OWN WORDS admits he will facilitate scamming for 0.3 BTC.

He is 100% certain that selling accounts facilitates scamming and is EVIL but is happy to facilitate scamming and become EVIL himself for 0.3 BTC.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50719875

It has not paid off because even in very recent times he is found begging for 0.02BTC loans. This kind of adds weight to the argument that this is NOT the original nutildah "the NEM stake holder and dash pusher" .  If that kind of person needs to be begging for 0.02btc loans then he must be the biggest loser on this board. This is likely NOTILDAH.


So why is someone like this on DT? a person that will willingly facilitate scamming and turn evil for 0.3btc and now a broke bum desperate and begging for 0.02btc loans??? sounds like a strange choice for a position of TRUST on this board??  the answer is simple. He is a Lauda gang supporter if not an ALT of lauda himself and is elevated to this position to entrench Lauda and his gang of rag tag ass kissers and scam supporters.

Lauda can be found saying in previous threads " nothing will cause him to red tag nutildah" ?? sounds legit?

Accounts like nutildah are the reason why lauda can go this far. He is surrounded by alts and ass kissing fools like LFC, pharmacist, suchmoon, nutildah all meriting each other all including each other on DT and all excluding similar people.

Now he claims the above post is evidence of insanity.

WATCH THIS.


Notildah - can you present the EXACT parts of our above post that are INCORRECT, or evidence of insanity?  We await your detailed explanation.

HE WILL PRESENT NOTHING at all that he can demonstrate is incorrect or evidence of insanity at all.

If you do not agree with laudas trust abuse YOU should be countering it. Else how else will the pseudo decentralized system of control have ANY chance?

Actually the entire blame for lauda being allowed to act like this is squarely at door of people like you and suchmoon (since theymos will not act)

You and suchmoon both employ double standards and try to weaponize gamed metrics against those that speak up against lauda and the gamed systems.

You can see suchmoon is now going after QS with accusations such as LIAR, ACCOUNT SELLER. When at the same time KNOWS Lauda is a liar and scammer but includes them on DT. At the same time knows nutildah sold or tried to sell his account in his own words KNOWING and believing HE was facilitating scammers and snitchmoon is not interested in seeing them punished at all. NO would rather support  them and include them on DT.  Suchmoon is not an excellent member, she is a fat (really fat) piece of snitching double standards untrustworthy shit. Never achieved anything here except whack a mole crap that does nothing and enabling real scammers and liars to gain access to positions of trust and power here. That is NET NEGATIVE, most of the crap it writes (with regard the control systems) is observably incorrect and pure moronic trash that she invents to keep people like herself and lauda in power here. Copy and paste is here weapon to silence any LEGITIMATE criticism. Along with post deletion because she can not win a reasoned debate due to being a full on fool.

Same for you the smarmacist. Commenting on other financially motivated  shit posters and trolls whilst having YOURSELF having a sneaky sock puppet aka Huge Black Woman account to sig spam and racist troll on whilst jumping from sig campaign to sig campaign to find the highest rates to spam at.  Sneaky, double standards and smarmy. Untrustworthy.  It is one thing doing it but then trying to punish other for it and lecturing them is disgusting.

None of you are interested in creating a transparent and fair environment where everyone gets treated equally. You all want to collude and just create a system where you feel some power and some are just after the best sig spots and escrowing deals etc.

Theymos must be stupid if he does not see this. The observable instances of you all just pushing double standards and weaponizing crap like copy and paste or deleted posts (reporting all someones one word posts from 7 years of history trying to get them banned)

Lauda is allowed to act like this because of gang of corrupt goons around him and theymos just sitting there watching it all trying to gage how much use lauda can be compared to how much damage he can do. This is not how it should work. If people are untrustworthy and scamming and abusing others then black list them.

Anyone who does not want a transparent fair environment where people are all treated equally should be removed from any positions of trust or power.

There is no other way. You are just trying to polish a turd here by tweaking these systems. If lauda was removed, another lauda and his gang will take their place with even more sneaky people like suchmoon and the pharmacist around them to keep them in power.

No, they are just too spineless to say anything about it, or take any action regarding it. I would liken it to a cop watching another cop break the law and beat on a suspect while cuffed. Sure they didn't beat the guy, but they sure kept their mouth shut didn't they? I wouldn't quite call that innocent, hence why they all get lumped into the same corrupt bunch.

No, I highly doubt anyone is creating DT/trust/merit/whatever drama threads just to crank out posts for signature campaigns.  Nor do I think the people involved in or who are even discussing the drama in these threads are doing so in order to increase their post counts.  I can speak for myself only, of course, but they're some of the most interesting threads around, and in so far as I'm on DT and know a little bit about some of the players, I do have opinions to add to some of these threads.

As far as campaign managers not counting posts in threads related to such drama, I doubt that's going to happen.  Are there even that many sig campaigns left?  I haven't looked at the services section in a long time, and I have signatures blocked. 

Not true.  You are making the mistake I've seen so many people make around here, which is to lump all the DT members and their ratings into Lauda's.  Not every DT member agrees with all of Lauda's feedback or with each other's for that matter.  Infighting is not unknown within the DT list, you know.

Thank you for stating the truth without being counter-aggressive.

Sounds like a lot of speculation, and groundless accusations with NO observable instances to substantiate it.

COMPARED TO

The observable instances of your own lying and scamming lauda?

Why should the board believe anything a PROVEN liar and scammer, probable extortionist and shady escrow has to say without them presenting observable instances as evidence?

Let's compare the actions of this user against your own OBSERVABLE actions and see who is more deserving of red trust?

@Khaos77

Yes, lauda is just a dirty euro trash scamming skank. That is not in doubt. The observable instances can not be altered.

This latest threat by lauda to give scam tags to any honest member that even trades with QS is another brazen fuck off to theymos who has said scam tags should be for scammers or those you can present a STRONG case of intent to scam.

You do touch on a rather more worrying issue than lauda itself: Theymos's support of lauda and his abuse. We are waiting to see how far he will allow lauda to go. Then again how much further can one go than allowing red trust to be used to silence whistle blowing and reporting scamming actions by the DT scammers themselves. Perhaps there is some small hope,  he seemed to allow vod to abuse for a certain period of time then reached out and bitch slapped vods fat ass when he really went to far. Perhaps lauda's going to get his in due course.

Perhaps hoping from intervention from the warden of the board is the wrong approach. It would be a formality to force lauda and his gang out but you would need to unite all those that are abused and for some senior members that don't like each other all that much to call a truce until the job is done. As we have said before lauda and gang are not vulnerable directly via the broken systems of control. However their sponsors are vulnerable by sponsoring OBSERVABLE  scammers and abusers, it is just a matter of applying sufficient pressure to the sponsors/campaign managers and keeping it up to cause enough friction for the sponsors to realize it is time to part ways with those scammers and abusers.

It is not rocket science. You just need a bunch of UNITED determined people who want to see a transparent fair environment where each member is treated equally. Not a bunch of fragmented individuals who are ONLY interested in getting THEIR OWN red trust removed or to secretly just wish they could be part of such a gang themselves.

Kiklo/Zin-Zang crying won't bring you anywhere. ZEIT is a dead shitcoin, and lying won't revive it. Dodging existing ratings via the use of alt accounts makes the user even shadier, i.e. even more deserving of even more ratings.

Just to cause a nuisance?

Please take a break from filling this board with your turd world feltching for btc dust lies and untrustworthy crap.

The thread is based on OBSERVABLE INSTANCES of behavior that is a  CLEAR ABUSE of the trust system. This is IMPOSSIBLE to deny you moronic asslicker.

This is not a nuisance, this is preventing the crappy trust system from damaging the free speech of this board.

YOU and your turd world trash pals/alts are the nuisance here. Look at you and your new sig. You are here ONLY to do or say anything to scavenge some extra btc scraps or shit tokens. The only thing transparent about you is that you will say or do anything to make some extra bucks.

If you keep repeating your observably incorrect LIES then you must be exposed on this board for the net negative and untrustworthy shit stain you are.

How can presenting observable instances of abuse by lauda in attempts to punish persons for pushing for clarity on their actions be a nuisance?   STFU

That makes the DT system very subjective and any opposition for me makes it quite healthy. There should be lefties to balance things out cause if all are in the right side there will be a huge problem. Keep barking doggo



Thank goodness problem solved.

Or simple, campaign managers should stop counting post made in DT/feedbacks drama threads but are this guys creating this topics because they're paid to via signature? I doubt so. If you're speaking of post via replies that can be understandable but for post via started topics I doubt it'll have any effect because this guy's create this type of posts just to cause nuisance.

It's a bit off-topic, but I have an idea, why not make a script to disable signature appearance in any topics relate to DT drama? I predict that somehow we might see less topics created.  If the forum can solve Yobit signature, there is same solution for DT drama topics 

How about now that you haven't been tagged, what does that prove?

We aren't kids here, we should know when politicking is involve in a feedback and when it's genuine. Green trust doesn't guarantee a user is trustworthy neither does red tag, it only means you should be extremely cautious. We shouldn't rely on the trust score but read the feedback and confirm using reference. Genuine feedbacks always have one.

It's funny, because if what I'm saying was nonsense/irrelevant, this thread wouldn't have this many replies.

It's facts. It's time for a change.

who are you too? a suckpuppet ass licking moron who keeps supporting a losing side? well your abuses will come to an end,your turn might not be today but it will come sucker.

I have no more time to waste for this forum however anyone who is interrested can digg in your history and see that during the massive red flag attack you talked with Lauda and the group openly to enforce your point of view to force all project owners to ONLY accept your choosen campaign managers and if somebody would reject you would defame him as scammer and kick him out of bitcointalk not important if he had a legit project.

Your thoughts are already dangerous for the forum and everything in the name of securing the forum.

From what do we know that bullshit explanation ?

Ahh i know from our beloved governments who wants more and more control for our safty against terrorist.

Sounds very similar to me

@Vod am still waiting for you big mouth to confirm your account.

So because I trust Lauda (we have traded multiple times with me sending first) that makes me a bad guy? I never join in on any of these little forum battles between people, as I am here to read about bitcoin etc... not join in the drama fest. I am not even DT1 these days so my ratings do not carry much weight like they used too anyways.

xolxol