Western Union considering using Bitcoin - page 2.

BTC Books

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: thebaron on April 19, 2013, 01:28:38 PM

Quote from: justusranvier on April 19, 2013, 01:27:16 PM

Quote from: BTC Books on April 19, 2013, 12:28:36 PM

Quote from: pekv2 on April 19, 2013, 12:12:48 PM

Damnit, I wish other places would jump on board like "NEWEGG,Tigerdirect,microcenter". We need a large authorized dealer hardware store to accept bitcoin. ugh.

Good news to hear that WU might jump on board, but we need more places too, not these raggedy website shops like bitcoin store.

There's something you want to buy that isn't here:

https://www.bitcoinstore.com/

Huh

It might be there, but good luck finding it.

Or finding it in stock.

I understand that it's in "beta" and all. But when you try and help a friend find a laptop, and you both just give up and order it elsewhere...

The thing is - as I understand it - that bitcoinstore has the mission of putting itself out of business.

Their stated goal is to show the NewEggs and Microcenters that bitcoin is something they should start to offer - and they're doing that by trying to prove that they can take enough business away from the big players to hurt.

So if you want NewEgg or Tiger to start accepting bitcoin, start using bitcoinstore. I do. Believe me, Roger will see to it that NewEgg has every sales report dangled in front of their faces...

And yeah - it isn't the prettiest or easiest to use site. Oh well.

thebaron

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: justusranvier on April 19, 2013, 01:27:16 PM

Quote from: BTC Books on April 19, 2013, 12:28:36 PM

Quote from: pekv2 on April 19, 2013, 12:12:48 PM

Damnit, I wish other places would jump on board like "NEWEGG,Tigerdirect,microcenter". We need a large authorized dealer hardware store to accept bitcoin. ugh.

Good news to hear that WU might jump on board, but we need more places too, not these raggedy website shops like bitcoin store.

There's something you want to buy that isn't here:

https://www.bitcoinstore.com/

Huh

It might be there, but good luck finding it.

Or finding it in stock.

I understand that it's in "beta" and all. But when you try and help a friend find a laptop, and you both just give up and order it elsewhere...

justusranvier

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1013

Quote from: BTC Books on April 19, 2013, 12:28:36 PM

Quote from: pekv2 on April 19, 2013, 12:12:48 PM

Damnit, I wish other places would jump on board like "NEWEGG,Tigerdirect,microcenter". We need a large authorized dealer hardware store to accept bitcoin. ugh.

Good news to hear that WU might jump on board, but we need more places too, not these raggedy website shops like bitcoin store.

There's something you want to buy that isn't here:

https://www.bitcoinstore.com/

Huh

It might be there, but good luck finding it.

BTC Books

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: pekv2 on April 19, 2013, 12:12:48 PM

Damnit, I wish other places would jump on board like "NEWEGG,Tigerdirect,microcenter". We need a large authorized dealer hardware store to accept bitcoin. ugh.

Good news to hear that WU might jump on board, but we need more places too, not these raggedy website shops like bitcoin store.

There's something you want to buy that isn't here:

https://www.bitcoinstore.com/

Huh

pekv2

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 502

Damnit, I wish other places would jump on board like "NEWEGG,Tigerdirect,microcenter". We need a large authorized dealer hardware store to accept bitcoin. ugh.

Good news to hear that WU might jump on board, but we need more places too, not these raggedy website shops like bitcoin store.

gollum

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

In Hashrate We Trust!

I hope someone at Western Union see this post and realizes that they cannot miss this one time opportunity with bitcoin.

WU can right now create a huge market for web shopping from developing countries, countries where most people do not have access to credit cards.

Even people with credit cards might prefer to use bitcoin when shopping online since it is more secure to spend bitcoin than use VISA card online.
What people need is easy methods for the exchange of cash to bitcoin through a dealer, and WU can offer that service.

virtualmaster

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Western Union would be a great bitcoin exchange if receives and sends bitcoins and could help out the bitcoin community from the actual exchange misery.

Tirapon

hero member

Activity: 898

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Spjuth on April 19, 2013, 06:09:50 AM

I think it is brilliant. WU have offices all over the world. All they need to do is to exchange bitcoin for fiat and vice versa.

So if someone in California wants to send money to a relative in Indonesia, he goes to WU and buys bitcoins (or he buys them from wherever since he lives in California). He then sends them to his relative in Indonesia who in turn sells them for local fiat at WU. So all WU does is guarantee liquidity all over the globe. Of course they can also help out with creating wallets for people in rural areas without computers/mobile phones/internet.

If Western Union would start doing this they will guarantee their survival and help the Bitcoin community and the world!

Now this would be a great idea, something I hadn't even considered.

Spjuth

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

I think it is brilliant. WU have offices all over the world. All they need to do is to exchange bitcoin for fiat and vice versa.

So if someone in California wants to send money to a relative in Indonesia, he goes to WU and buys bitcoins (or he buys them from wherever since he lives in California). He then sends them to his relative in Indonesia who in turn sells them for local fiat at WU. So all WU does is guarantee liquidity all over the globe. Of course they can also help out with creating wallets for people in rural areas without computers/mobile phones/internet.

If Western Union would start doing this they will guarantee their survival and help the Bitcoin community and the world!

gollum

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

In Hashrate We Trust!

Quote from: deepceleron on April 19, 2013, 01:51:08 AM

This is like when you could order telegrams over the Internet from Western Union. It is hard to make a business model by embracing the thing that makes you irrelevant.

No I think its a win-win situation for both bitcoin users and Western Union.

Many of Western Unions customers are people from poor countries working in richer countries and they send money to their family in the home country.
With the progress in developing countries and internet penetration around the globe Western Unions clientbase will decrease when people find easier and cheaper ways to send money home.
So this is an opportunity for Western Union to take the step to the internet age of crypto currencies, or become as obsolete as telegrams.

It is beneficial for bitcoin as well if Western Union "franchises" bitcoin, the moment they do so 7 billion people will be able to buy, sell or transfer bitcoins even if they dont have internet or mobile phones.
Without Western Union this development might take decades to reach 7 billion people.

BTC Books

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: deepceleron on April 19, 2013, 01:51:08 AM

This is like when you could order telegrams over the Internet from Western Union. It is hard to make a business model by embracing the thing that makes you irrelevant.

That was a thing? Seriously?

I'm shocked that I missed it...

psybits

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1000

This has been discussed here and I recommend anyone looking for more info to take a look

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/2013-04-18-foxbusiness-bitcoin-buzz-draws-western-union-moneygram-179943

deepceleron

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1036

This is like when you could order telegrams over the Internet from Western Union. It is hard to make a business model by embracing the thing that makes you irrelevant.

Hfleer

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Changing avatars is currently not possible.

They can either embrace Bitcoin or die

Peleus

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 100

Quote from: Minor Miner on April 18, 2013, 11:46:06 PM

Quote from: BTC Books on April 18, 2013, 11:38:22 PM

Quote from: Minor Miner on April 18, 2013, 11:26:44 PM

...so why use bitcoins for something they already do over their own network?

Two reasons, I would venture to say:
One: to fill the obvious (and obviously profitable) void in bitcoinland on the exchange front. And
Two: To preempt (to forestall or prevent (something anticipated) by acting first; preclude; head off), by integration, what is quite likely to be a successful competitor.
As I mentioned earlier, they're a very forward-thinking company.

just to nit pick. there is no need for exchanges (the concept is silly for the long term) as BTC will trade on an FX exchange when demand merits which will eliminate the need for gox et al. But they would be a broker or market maker which could be great.

To be fair, given the time this will take (long term), there could be quite a profitable short - medium term given a lot of the infrastructure is already there for them.

Minor Miner

legendary

Activity: 2478

Merit: 1020

Be A Digital Miner

Quote from: BTC Books on April 18, 2013, 11:38:22 PM

Quote from: Minor Miner on April 18, 2013, 11:26:44 PM

...so why use bitcoins for something they already do over their own network?

Two reasons, I would venture to say:
One: to fill the obvious (and obviously profitable) void in bitcoinland on the exchange front. And
Two: To preempt (to forestall or prevent (something anticipated) by acting first; preclude; head off), by integration, what is quite likely to be a successful competitor.
As I mentioned earlier, they're a very forward-thinking company.

just to nit pick. there is no need for exchanges (the concept is silly for the long term) as BTC will trade on an FX exchange when demand merits which will eliminate the need for gox et al. But they would be a broker or market maker which could be great.

BTC Books

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Minor Miner on April 18, 2013, 11:26:44 PM

...so why use bitcoins for something they already do over their own network?

Two reasons, I would venture to say:

One: to fill the obvious (and obviously profitable) void in bitcoinland on the exchange front. And

Two: To preempt (to forestall or prevent (something anticipated) by acting first; preclude; head off), by integration, what is quite likely to be a successful competitor.

As I mentioned earlier, they're a very forward-thinking company.

Peleus

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 100

Yeah, I know it's an assumption, but if they are using some form of internal Hawala I don't see how BTC would be useful for them.

Minor Miner

legendary

Activity: 2478

Merit: 1020

Be A Digital Miner

Quote from: BTC Books on April 18, 2013, 11:16:20 PM

Quote from: Peleus on April 18, 2013, 11:04:21 PM

Quote from: BTC Books on April 18, 2013, 10:57:32 PM

You're re-inventing the Islamic Halawa transfer system:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawala

Money in the West works differently. We can be open about charging interest, for example.

Thanks for the link. I'm not necessarily advocating it in any way, I just always thought that it would be the type of system WU would use considering it can "trust" itself, and the Hawala agents (in this case) are simply bank accounts it owns in different countries. Unless one countries bank account gets quite low (Ie. lots of people sending money to the US but no one sending it out) they would be avoiding international transaction fee's via this method.

They avoid their fair share, I suppose.

You should read the Wiki article on WU - it's a fascinating company: forward-thinking, but still steeped in a certain amount of internal tradition. I'm going to keep my eyes open for a good book on their history. I do run across the odd book every now and then. Wink

read the prospectus from when they were spun out of FDC, it is interesting it wasn't that long ago. or their annuals. you know that if you call IR of any public company and request hard copies that they have to send you their annual right? I do not understand why bitcoins would really help them since they basically take money, and then let you (not you since it goes to someone else) withdraw the money at another location. so why use bitcoins for something they already do over their own network?

BTC Books

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Peleus on April 18, 2013, 11:04:21 PM

Quote from: BTC Books on April 18, 2013, 10:57:32 PM

You're re-inventing the Islamic Halawa transfer system:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawala

Money in the West works differently. We can be open about charging interest, for example.

Thanks for the link. I'm not necessarily advocating it in any way, I just always thought that it would be the type of system WU would use considering it can "trust" itself, and the Hawala agents (in this case) are simply bank accounts it owns in different countries. Unless one countries bank account gets quite low (Ie. lots of people sending money to the US but no one sending it out) they would be avoiding international transaction fee's via this method.

They avoid their fair share, I suppose.

You should read the Wiki article on WU - it's a fascinating company: forward-thinking, but still steeped in a certain amount of internal tradition. I'm going to keep my eyes open for a good book on their history. I do run across the odd book every now and then. Wink

Topic: Western Union considering using Bitcoin - page 2. (Read 7079 times)