Topic: What are your thoughts on Numus' Features? Decentralized Exchange and more (Read 3105 times)
April 16, 2014, 10:28:10 AM
There's around 1 week left in the IPO I think if anyone wants to invest.
March 31, 2014, 02:29:37 PM
Well, I read the paper. Decentralized exchange the only real concern me, although I didn't see the current defects, probably ways to misuse it.
This need to adopt! I want to see it even in the future time spirit movie! I bet it will be
The mobile sector seems like the key for adoption here. This need to adopt! I want to see it even in the future time spirit movie! I bet it will be
March 31, 2014, 11:39:01 AM
SCAM ?!? - the time will show if I'm wrong or not
I guess it will, but from what I've seen so far this is the furthest thing from a scam compared to IPO's in recent memory. March 31, 2014, 11:31:07 AM
SCAM ?!? - the time will show if I'm wrong or not
March 31, 2014, 11:24:50 AM
Gonna be investing soon, the marketing sold me.
March 30, 2014, 09:36:58 AM
Invested 0.1 BTC in it, lets see where this goes
March 30, 2014, 07:34:14 AM
I think we're getting sidetracked a bit here, this seems to be turning into a NXT bashing thread
You're ridiculous, you went into a huge tirade against NXT out of the blue and then are suggesting others have turned the thread into NXT bashing.
But the real ridiculous thing and I don't care if you deny it but i'm pretty sure by your desire to start this thread seperate to the Numus and you desire to bash NXT while acting like you know nothing about this new coin when its just a fork of peercoin. But mainly its my gut hunch your the same guy who started the Numus thread and now are trying to funnel people into thinking its awesome.
BYE.....
March 30, 2014, 06:22:58 AM
I think we're getting sidetracked a bit here, this seems to be turning into a NXT bashing thread
You're ridiculous, you went into a huge tirade against NXT out of the blue and then are suggesting others have turned the thread into NXT bashing.
But the real ridiculous thing and I don't care if you deny it but i'm pretty sure by your desire to start this thread seperate to the Numus and you desire to bash NXT while acting like you know nothing about this new coin when its just a fork of peercoin. But mainly its my gut hunch your the same guy who started the Numus thread and now are trying to funnel people into thinking its awesome.
BYE.....
March 30, 2014, 06:07:59 AM
I think we're getting sidetracked a bit here, this seems to be turning into a NXT bashing thread
March 30, 2014, 05:40:15 AM
Wasn't NXT the one that lied about how long one had to buy into the IPO, suddenly closing the IPO before its announced closure date, thus screwing maybe the vast majority of people who were considering buying it by closing the buying unexpectedly?
-MarkM-
-MarkM-
NXT was the one that was freely available to buy for a couple of months but had very little interest. Where people on this forum massively profited by getting in early while most didn't and to this day bitter complain about it. Plus they also could of freely bought in the early stages on DGEX as dirt cheap prices again massively increasing their investment.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nxt-descendant-of-bitcoin-303898
Accepting you were wrong is the first stage of growing up. Some people never do...
So are you claiming they did not bait and switch the IPO buy-in period, people did actually have the amount of time they were told up front they had in which to reach their decision to buy in?
Which coin was it that did, then?
I distinctly recall there was an IPO type coin that did a bait and switch, announcing the deadline by which to decide to buy so that people could schedule it in their to-do lists then actually closing it quite some time before those to-do- list items would have actually been reached in people's day to day processing of deadlines.
-MarkM-
March 30, 2014, 05:38:33 AM
Well, I read the paper. Decentralized exchange the only real concern me, although I didn't see the current defects, probably ways to misuse it.
This need to adopt! I want to see it even in the future time spirit movie! I bet it will be
This need to adopt! I want to see it even in the future time spirit movie! I bet it will be
March 29, 2014, 02:18:06 PM
Wasn't NXT the one that lied about how long one had to buy into the IPO, suddenly closing the IPO before its announced closure date, thus screwing maybe the vast majority of people who were considering buying it by closing the buying unexpectedly?
-MarkM-
-MarkM-
NXT was the one that was freely available to buy for a couple of months but had very little interest. Where people on this forum massively profited by getting in early while most didn't and to this day bitter complain about it. Plus they also could of freely bought in the early stages on DGEX as dirt cheap prices again massively increasing their investment.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nxt-descendant-of-bitcoin-303898
Accepting you were wrong is the first stage of growing up. Some people never do...
March 29, 2014, 02:03:43 PM
My thoughts on these features and the "whitepaper" is that they are just a bunch of touts to sell the IPO, and will most likely never see the light of day. Build it and put out a tech demo first.
March 29, 2014, 01:50:03 PM
Wasn't NXT the one that lied about how long one had to buy into the IPO, suddenly closing the IPO before its announced closure date, thus screwing maybe the vast majority of people who were considering buying it by closing the buying unexpectedly?
-MarkM-
Exactly -MarkM-
March 29, 2014, 07:31:53 AM
Wasn't NXT the one that lied about how long one had to buy into the IPO, suddenly closing the IPO before its announced closure date, thus screwing maybe the vast majority of people who were considering buying it by closing the buying unexpectedly?
-MarkM-
The same one. -MarkM-
March 29, 2014, 07:19:47 AM
Wasn't NXT the one that lied about how long one had to buy into the IPO, suddenly closing the IPO before its announced closure date, thus screwing maybe the vast majority of people who were considering buying it by closing the buying unexpectedly?
-MarkM-
-MarkM-
March 29, 2014, 06:37:18 AM
What is the motivation to buy into the IPO?
Early investors that take a big risk only share 2.5% of total coins. (and even the total coins seems to be undefined)
So say even a mildly successful IPO of say 50 coins would mean you get 500,000 coins of a total 1 Billion, 250,000 if 100 etc.... Ok so if its as successful as say NXT then its an 'ok' investment, not amazing but ok. But coins come and go all the time these days, the coin is only an adaption of an another coin. So I would say there is nothing for the early investor here to get excited about. And indeed you could lose money even if the coin is decent.
IPO's must have a big mark up to early investors otherwise there is zero motivation to invest and not just buy once it hits exchanges. The developers need to rethink the IPO amounts..
Early investors that take a big risk only share 2.5% of total coins. (and even the total coins seems to be undefined)
So say even a mildly successful IPO of say 50 coins would mean you get 500,000 coins of a total 1 Billion, 250,000 if 100 etc.... Ok so if its as successful as say NXT then its an 'ok' investment, not amazing but ok. But coins come and go all the time these days, the coin is only an adaption of an another coin. So I would say there is nothing for the early investor here to get excited about. And indeed you could lose money even if the coin is decent.
IPO's must have a big mark up to early investors otherwise there is zero motivation to invest and not just buy once it hits exchanges. The developers need to rethink the IPO amounts..
Are you seriosuly trying to compare NXT's IPO to this or any other IPO for that matter. NXT's initial disctribution comprised around 50 stakeholders who own ALL of NXT. NXT has a few mega-rich investors and the rest are dirt-poor in NXT. Let's think about that logically, if one stakeholder decided to throw in the towel one day and sells all his NXT that would bring the market crashing down to its knees.
The reason you don't see coins which offer full shares to the investors anymore is because those coins are time-bombs as soon as one investors sells the market will come crashing down and soon other initial investors will also panic sell at lower prices bringing the market price down even further. You fail to realize that big returns can still be made through early investments in coins with IPO's less than 5% of the total supply. Investors could purchase low and sell very high and make massive returns.
I didn't fail to realize anything you noob. You spectacularly missed my point, I only used NXT as an example of a successful coin that increased in price many fold but still to share say 2.5% of NXT now wouldn't be worth it once divided by a sizable number of stakeholders. And your logic that large percentage IPO's are unfiar are nonsense if the offer is open to all and they can buy in as much as they want. NXT was lopsided cause no one was that interested at the time and thats also why people get so bitter about it cause we know for a fact the distribution is more balanced than Bitcoin at this time. Anyway my point was about IPO's need some kind of payback for people to risk capital. With this there seems very little...
March 29, 2014, 05:18:28 AM
What is the motivation to buy into the IPO?
Early investors that take a big risk only share 2.5% of total coins. (and even the total coins seems to be undefined)
So say even a mildly successful IPO of say 50 coins would mean you get 500,000 coins of a total 1 Billion, 250,000 if 100 etc.... Ok so if its as successful as say NXT then its an 'ok' investment, not amazing but ok. But coins come and go all the time these days, the coin is only an adaption of an another coin. So I would say there is nothing for the early investor here to get excited about. And indeed you could lose money even if the coin is decent.
IPO's must have a big mark up to early investors otherwise there is zero motivation to invest and not just buy once it hits exchanges. The developers need to rethink the IPO amounts..
Early investors that take a big risk only share 2.5% of total coins. (and even the total coins seems to be undefined)
So say even a mildly successful IPO of say 50 coins would mean you get 500,000 coins of a total 1 Billion, 250,000 if 100 etc.... Ok so if its as successful as say NXT then its an 'ok' investment, not amazing but ok. But coins come and go all the time these days, the coin is only an adaption of an another coin. So I would say there is nothing for the early investor here to get excited about. And indeed you could lose money even if the coin is decent.
IPO's must have a big mark up to early investors otherwise there is zero motivation to invest and not just buy once it hits exchanges. The developers need to rethink the IPO amounts..
Are you seriosuly trying to compare NXT's IPO to this or any other IPO for that matter. NXT's initial disctribution comprised around 50 stakeholders who own ALL of NXT. NXT has a few mega-rich investors and the rest are dirt-poor in NXT. Let's think about that logically, if one stakeholder decided to throw in the towel one day and sells all his NXT that would bring the market crashing down to its knees.
The reason you don't see coins which offer full shares to the investors anymore is because those coins are time-bombs as soon as one investors sells the market will come crashing down and soon other initial investors will also panic sell at lower prices bringing the market price down even further. You fail to realize that big returns can still be made through early investments in coins with IPO's less than 5% of the total supply. Investors could purchase low and sell very high and make massive returns.
March 29, 2014, 05:02:36 AM
The way I see it is that John and Jenny don't know each other since only their addresses would be shown. Therefore there would be no reason for them to stab each other in the back.
[emphasis added]This actually tends to have the opposite effect.
March 29, 2014, 04:59:06 AM
What is the motivation to buy into the IPO?
Early investors that take a big risk only share 2.5% of total coins. (and even the total coins seems to be undefined)
So say even a mildly successful IPO of say 50 coins would mean you get 500,000 coins of a total 1 Billion, 250,000 if 100 etc.... Ok so if its as successful as say NXT then its an 'ok' investment, not amazing but ok. But coins come and go all the time these days, the coin is only an adaption of an another coin. So I would say there is nothing for the early investor here to get excited about. And indeed you could lose money even if the coin is decent.
IPO's must have a big mark up to early investors otherwise there is zero motivation to invest and not just buy once it hits exchanges. The developers need to rethink the IPO amounts..
Early investors that take a big risk only share 2.5% of total coins. (and even the total coins seems to be undefined)
So say even a mildly successful IPO of say 50 coins would mean you get 500,000 coins of a total 1 Billion, 250,000 if 100 etc.... Ok so if its as successful as say NXT then its an 'ok' investment, not amazing but ok. But coins come and go all the time these days, the coin is only an adaption of an another coin. So I would say there is nothing for the early investor here to get excited about. And indeed you could lose money even if the coin is decent.
IPO's must have a big mark up to early investors otherwise there is zero motivation to invest and not just buy once it hits exchanges. The developers need to rethink the IPO amounts..
Jump to: