The question isn't answerable.
And it doesn't only apply to chicken but rather every living thing
You can say its a miracle from God.
He Planned and created everything the way he wanted to.
So just accept the fact and live on
Topic: What Came First, the Chicken or the Egg? (Read 5464 times)
There is essentially very little difference chicken to chicken. But there are vast differences chicken to quail.
This is more practical thinking, with much greater scope. It makes the whole idea of which came first, chicken or egg, to be a silly question posed by ignorant people.
This is more practical thinking, with much greater scope. It makes the whole idea of which came first, chicken or egg, to be a silly question posed by ignorant people.
Chicken incubates and hatches eggs laid by the same.
In creation, chicken came first before egg.
In evolution chicken came first before egg, as what determines the fact of the matter is that egg must be incubated and hatched, and nothing does this then before science evolution than the chicken.
In creation, chicken came first before egg.
In evolution chicken came first before egg, as what determines the fact of the matter is that egg must be incubated and hatched, and nothing does this then before science evolution than the chicken.
Referring to biblical reference, chicken came first because why would God create an egg if he can already make an evolved one.
Let's take away fairy tales for a moment, and concentrate on reality.
The egg came first, because all chickens must come from eggs.
Without invoking make believe, how did a chicken appear without being grown in an egg?
Wrong. All chickens come from chicken eggs, which were laid by the chicken, first.
Base from the Genesis or the creation of God, animals are one of his creations including the chicken (I guess) and I read some articles that the shell of the egg is made of proteins that the chicken produces. So I think chicken came first .
Referring to biblical reference, chicken came first because why would God create an egg if he can already make an evolved one.
Let's take away fairy tales for a moment, and concentrate on reality.
The egg came first, because all chickens must come from eggs.
Without invoking make believe, how did a chicken appear without being grown in an egg?
Forget it. A chicken egg is simply a chicken with a shell around it. Which came first, the chicken or the chicken?
The chicken was created first.
chuck norris came first kicked the chicken and got so scared it shot out an egg... OBVI jeeeze 
No one can answer this but many peoples have a explanation just like me egg is first how the egg came if theirs no chicken but how is the chicken if their is no egg so i dont know if eeg or chicken.
A question of "what came first, the chicken or egg?" is an issue of discourse since I was a child. And I must admit that until now, I still don't know what the exact answer is and what is the concrete explanation for that. But based on my hypothetical guess, I think that chicken came first. It is for the reason that the egg cannot evolutionize to chicken from different organism or animals. Unlike chicken, it can possibly came from or evolutionized from the other species. And when exposed to a harmful or strange environment, chicken is more likely to survive than the egg. Hence, there can be no chicken to reproduce egg if in the first place, it came from an egg that is so weak to survive.
The chicken and it was testy enough in McChicken menu Seriously - the chicken made by God, then another spouse chicken and finally the egg. Or there is another version - the egg was delivered by aliens then the first chicken made selfpregnancy to proceed the chicken being. Sounds realistic?)
Seriously - the chicken made by God, then another spouse chicken and finally the egg. Or there is another version - the egg was delivered by aliens then the first chicken made selfpregnancy to proceed the chicken being. Sounds realistic?) 
This is a very popular question; even as a kid this was always being asked by my friends and even older people. But up to now nobody won the argument this may sound funny but this is very philosophical question in a very funny way.
For me both the egg and the chicken came at the same time.
In the bible you will read in Genesis that God created all living being including animals that flies and walks and that includes the chicken. There was no mention of eggs.
Evolutionist would argue that all living being came from a one celled organism and evolved. In the earlier stage there was no giving birth but it was eggs that were brought by the water creatures before it evolved and steps on land. When those organisms set forth on land and began to evolve that is the era where chickens are found. In this story eggs came first.
But both of the story were no clear evidence and thus there is no saying which came first so to make it fair let us just accept that probably they exist at the same time.
For me both the egg and the chicken came at the same time.
In the bible you will read in Genesis that God created all living being including animals that flies and walks and that includes the chicken. There was no mention of eggs.
Evolutionist would argue that all living being came from a one celled organism and evolved. In the earlier stage there was no giving birth but it was eggs that were brought by the water creatures before it evolved and steps on land. When those organisms set forth on land and began to evolve that is the era where chickens are found. In this story eggs came first.
But both of the story were no clear evidence and thus there is no saying which came first so to make it fair let us just accept that probably they exist at the same time.
What is in an egg? A chicken, of course; a chicken with a shell. So, the question is really, "What came first, the chicken or the chicken?"
This thread is even more idiotic than the flat earth thread.
This thread is even more idiotic than the flat earth thread.
First came pussy before baby. facking lol.
But that doesn't answer the question, because the cat would eat the chicken.
First came pussy before baby. facking lol.
Definitely the CHICKEN came first than egg..
Without chicken, there will be no egg. Even in the bible stated, God created pairs of ANIMALS, it never stated there that God created a pairs of egg... 😅
Without chicken, there will be no egg. Even in the bible stated, God created pairs of ANIMALS, it never stated there that God created a pairs of egg... 😅
So where did the chicken come from?
Your fairy tales aside, all chickens MUST come from eggs. There is no evidence of chickens just spontaneously appearing.
Since the egg is only part of the chicken, how can you apply evolution?
In evolution, some other creature must have laid the egg which hatched out a chicken. This is against evolution theory because of the gigantically large number of mutations it would have taken to convert something else into a chicken inside the same egg.
In addition, there would have had to have been two of these conversions at nearly the same time... one a hen, and the other a rooster. This is the only way that future chickens could have come about. We're back to the same old question of evolution or no evolution.
Since we don't have any real evidence for evolution, and since all the evidence that is called evidence for evolution is only a bunch of people (some scientists) talking through their hats, the chicken came first. Why? Because no evidence for evolution means no evolution. Things were created by God, just like the Bible says. Chicken came first.
Definitely the CHICKEN came first than egg..
Without chicken, there will be no egg. Even in the bible stated, God created pairs of ANIMALS, it never stated there that God created a pairs of egg... 😅
Without chicken, there will be no egg. Even in the bible stated, God created pairs of ANIMALS, it never stated there that God created a pairs of egg... 😅
So where did the chicken come from?
Your fairy tales aside, all chickens MUST come from eggs. There is no evidence of chickens just spontaneously appearing.
Nobody has ever found anything other than a chicken in a chicken egg. Since it is a chicken - even though it might be in developmental stages - the whole thing is a chicken, even the egg. This makes the chicken and the egg to have come about at the same time, since the egg is also the chicken in a non-adult chicken form.
The question is an entirely incorrect question.
The question is an entirely incorrect question.
Evolution is a story that we have not seen even one, factual example of. There are lots of stories about how it might be true. But there isn't one example of it. All the so-called evidence fits adaptation better then evolution.
God created the chicken before the chicken egg. Since that time, animals - and even plants - have offspring like their parents, not like some other creature.
There are countless billions (trillions?) of examples of like begets like, but not even one of evolution where an animal (be it egg or not) turned into a different animal.
God created the chicken before the chicken egg. Since that time, animals - and even plants - have offspring like their parents, not like some other creature.
There are countless billions (trillions?) of examples of like begets like, but not even one of evolution where an animal (be it egg or not) turned into a different animal.
Jump to: