Topic: what can we do about Mark Karpeles now - page 2. (Read 5624 times)

WTF! 

I disagree, although researching who we trust with our money is important, when someone violates that trust, they are responsible, not the victim. "He shouldn't have left the door unlocked if he didn't want it stolen!" is a criminal mindset used to justify abhorrent behaviour.

I don't know why so many people think Mark Karpeles would try to hide any of his assets. Why I heard he bought gox.com a few days ago. So we can look at the WHOIS records and it will clearly show that Mark is not trying to hide any assets much less any of his recently purchased assets.

Checking the public WHOIS records at Godaddy.com clearly confirms this as the following result will show...

Oh wait! He registered it under privacy. Godaddy is helping him hide his assets through their Domains By Proxy, LLC service. Yet another tool in the scammer's toolbax.

So you have to sue Godaddy to find out who they are hiding with their Domains By Proxy service.

Domain Name: GOX.COM
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Registrant Name: Registration Private
Registrant Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Name Server: NS-1009.AWSDNS-62.NET
Name Server: NS-345.AWSDNS-43.COM
Name Server: NS-1173.AWSDNS-18.ORG
Name Server: NS-1637.AWSDNS-12.CO.UK
DNSSEC: unsigned

For complete domain details go to:
http://who.godaddy.com/whoischeck.aspx?domain=GOX.COM

The data contained in GoDaddy.com, LLC's WhoIs database,
while believed by the company to be reliable, is provided "as is"
with no guarantee or warranties regarding its accuracy.  This
information is provided for the sole purpose of assisting you
in obtaining information about domain name registration records.
Any use of this data for any other purpose is expressly forbidden without the prior written
permission of GoDaddy.com, LLC.  By submitting an inquiry,
you agree to these terms of usage and limitations of warranty.  In particular,
you agree not to use this data to allow, enable, or otherwise make possible,
dissemination or collection of this data, in part or in its entirety, for any
purpose, such as the transmission of unsolicited advertising and
and solicitations of any kind, including spam.  You further agree
not to use this data to enable high volume, automated or robotic electronic
processes designed to collect or compile this data for any purpose,
including mining this data for your own personal or commercial purposes.

Please note: the registrant of the domain name is specified
in the "registrant" section.  In most cases, GoDaddy.com, LLC
is not the registrant of domain names listed in this database.

they never dropped below #2 most liquid exchange.

 

Wouldn't mind one bit.

edit:

thanks for the laugh haha

Oh, we don't have any psychopaths here. That requires real balls. We mostly have kleptomaniacs, antisocial personality disorder and the odd normal person that reads threads and posts wtf repeatedly because their in shock at the overt displays of stupidity.

from pastebin today, probably a few days old:

"[19:26] this is hurting us a lot however, not mentionning the names of our staff posted on reddit, families/etc being stalked, etc"

I'm quite convinced that people here are not considering this, but any public fantasising, however beneficial for your own state of mind, can be contributing to someone else going over the top.

Suggesting anything else than peaceful protests or jokes about France in general, is not proper conduct in any sense.

How about any evidence? I'm not saying there is no criminal activity going on at gox. I'm saying you and I don't know. What would you say at his trial? "your honor, the accused is guilty based on my hunch." You will need facts in court, except in the court of bitcointalk. Here you can say anything is a fact and anyone who disagrees must be in on the grand conspiracy.

Who wants to bet that some (psychopath) of the bitcoin community will come out and murder him by the end of the year?

Blame myself? Why would I blame myself? I didn't have a single satoshi or any fiat in MtGOX. I didn't lose anything because I have 100% full control of my private keys. I wasn't dimwitted enough to relinquish the one and only thing I control in the Bitcoin protocol.

The question now stands; were you dimwitted enough?


Yes, evidence. You know; that thing you need to be proven guilty. Didn't you know people are innocent until proven guilty by evidence? I'm mean seriously dude, WTF is wrong with you people?

NastyShitForHire.onion.to

No you’re not

could you pm me where can i see this nasty shit? i am very interested in it

There is some nasty shit around the webs of what some would like to do to him and his family, together with personal information. Protection is wise, he won't run anywhere in that case and will be very cooperative with investigators.

No clue. I know Im not. My Bitcoins stay in my control and I dont use gox. I imagine someone from a government agency is actually pulling strings. Watch the 200,000 BTC wallet gox still controls for anything interesting.

just one more question, are we actually "paying for" his protection fee?

Rumor has it from my Fed friends is that Mark has protection from a group of people. I wont go into it any further

I am guessing some Russians are looking forward to give him a big kiss in the mouth.

stop fooling us, you don't even believe what come out of your mouth, no evidence? what evidence do you want? a video of Mark Karpeles sending bitcoins to bitstamp and selling them into an offshore account in name of CEO Mark Karpeles?

Violation of contract constitutes more than simple incompetence.