It was never intended to replace fiat in the first place but rather been created for the sole purpose of p2p and decentralization which it did really made its purpose well.It is really just people are overextending that much
about the probabilities or do really make out some conclusions that it would really be a traditional currency which is something that we do know that it cant really happen and i do also believe about that being a reserve.
Lets not put ourselves into haste on minding about mass adoption yet we are really heading on that area.
I don't know, I think it was originally intended to replace a broken system. Well, maybe not completely replace, but to replace the trust factor that people tend to give even with their own money. Effectively, it was a dig at banks, and how people blindly trust them.
If it wasn't created to completely replace the current system, I do believe it was created to show the people that there are alternatives, which I would argue the goal of that has been achieved. Everyone now knows what Bitcoin is, they might not understand it yet, and I think that ties in with the original discussion, that mass adoption will only really occur if Bitcoin is made simpler to understand. Dumbed down if you will.
The biggest issues we see these days is the complexity, that creates uncertainty, and therefore in turn creates hostility. People generally fear what they don't understand. Bitcoin is something I do believe is subjected to that thought process.
But itself is meaningless. This "hodling lifestyle" works as long as there's a basic utility. And the only way you can utilize bitcoin is to use it as a currency. There's no other purpose. Period. It's a short term investment or a gold 2.0 or whatever you want, as long as it's useful in society somehow.
Right, which to be honest I do believe we've already highlighted the usefulness of Bitcoin. I mean, we've got hundreds, thousands of people who now know that trusting someone else with your wealth isn't exactly the greatness idea, especially when that's bit people in the arse before. Bitcoin basically gave people the choice of freedom, and while it might not suit everyone it does give you the choice, which you didn't have before. Well, technically you could not use a bank, and just use cash, however receiving money globally then isn't exactly easy. Bitcoin bridges that gap quite effectively.
Although, I do agree that it doesn't really matter what the use case is, as long a there is a use. For me, I don't ever see there no being a use for a currency which respects privacy, and being rather trustless.