Residents of any country in the world can officially use only the national currency as a means of payment (if somewhere this is not the case, then correct me). Of course, you can pay in any other currency in a dark alley, if you agree, but the only legal means is always the national currency of the country of your residence. If you look at the situation from this point of view, then why would the governments of any country allow the use of bitcoin as a means of payment? Other currencies are not allowed, but bitcoin will be allowed. Why would governments suddenly be given such privileges for bitcoin? For me personally, this is obvious and my forecasts are pessimistic in this regard. The maximum, in my opinion, that they will allow is to officially invest in bitcoin and generously allow you to share % of the profits with them.
I think you are wrong here.
Legal tender (national currency) - "is a form of money that courts of law are required to recognize as satisfactory payment"
(wiki). So it does not mean that you are forced to use it to pay for something. It means that you are forced to accept it if someone is trying to use it to pay for something. So you can legally pay for TV using your PC (barter exchange -
Is bartering legal in the US?) if someone else is accepting such payment.
Many shops in my country (especially those close to borders) have 2 prices on each product (national currency and euro) so that tourists could easily pay using both currencies.
I spoke from the position of my experience and the characteristics of my region. Of course, each region has its own peculiarities and nuances. It is in your country you can use 2 currencies (EU and national currency), and in mine only 1. Other options are officially impossible. Even a business that receives income in dollars is obliged to exchange them for the national currency (such a tricky way for the government to take away $).
Your view of the situation is based solely on where you live,
Quite right. Everyone looks at any situation through the prism of their experience and observations, but we have some advantage - a forum. Here we can share our knowledge, information, experience, thoughts, which allows us to get a versatile and close to complete picture. To do this, I raised these questions in this topic in order to hear different points of view and look at the situation from different angles.
The fact is that the state cares exclusively about collecting taxes, and all those who operate legally are liable to pay taxes.
Indeed, so! This is its main function, everything else is idle talk.
In addition, sellers use a local payment processor that allows them to get a fiat directly to their bank account, in the end, it is a win-win situation for everyone.
Did I understand correctly that people in some places in your country pay in bitcoin, which are converted into fiat and go to the seller's account from which taxes are paid? So basically everything is legal?
However, one thing we must not forget is that most people do not see Bitcoin as a currency, but as a speculative asset - which leads us to the fact that the volume of such payments would probably not increase significantly even if Bitcoin becomes a legal tender in most countries.
I am also inclined to the point of view that bitcoin has strongly departed from Satoshi's concept. The function as a means of payment has evolved / transformed into an investment tool, a way of accumulation, savings. The role of the method of payment for goods and services has been partially preserved, but the share of this is already smaller.