Topic: What criteria do you use to analyze ICOs? - page 2. (Read 430 times)
For me I think first and foremost thing to put into consideration is the relevance of the project in solving the immediate and future problems of people cos the projection of the entire blockchain technology is to make the world a better place to live. Second, the team behind the project is as important as the project, cos its the ideas, plans and hardwork of the team will result into the success of the project. Lastly I think community support is also a key factor to consider also.
Hey guys, I am trying to develop a model to price and score ICOs. I believe this model can potentially help a lot of people. By developing a model that is as objective as possible, I can start to accurately rank and score ICOs. This will help to weed through all of the scams and junk out there. I just wanted to know what are some objective criteria that you use???
The things I can think of so far.
Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...
I appreciate any input! Thanks
The things I can think of so far.
Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...
I appreciate any input! Thanks
My advice is don't over emphasize Team.
Some projects have all star teams, but their token economy is ridiculous, which makes it uninvestable.
this depends on the individual each look, but I think personally, a good ico can be seen from the idea of the project and the most important is the hype of the community, if crowded then most likely many investors will be interested as well
I look in what sector the project is working, what are the features and need of the project, team and popularity of project.
First of all it's an idea and mission of project. Secondly, it's a team and advisor, whether they had pevious ICO success. I always read information about team.
Project vision and the team are the most important things to me, it's good if the project is trying to solve a new problem instead of copying others and the team must have a decent background in order to convince me that they can run the project as they've stated in their roadmap. I also care about the hardcap because it's not good to collect too much money.
Comparing ICO's can be beneficial to both cryptocurrency investors as well as the ICO .... People's opinions about different project may be used as a base.
Good thinking, but I usually to see team, allocation, sales prospects and manager.
A good ICO has an active teamn looking for investors, then a minimum of $ 500,000 allocation, and also do not forget to choosing a manager.
because a good ICO, usually will choose a manager who has positif trust
A good ICO has an active teamn looking for investors, then a minimum of $ 500,000 allocation, and also do not forget to choosing a manager.
because a good ICO, usually will choose a manager who has positif trust
Before joining an ICO make sure that the project is reliable, efficient and has a good background. Know it's mission and vision which defines it's value and of course the team members and advisor, All these are important in determining if an ICO will succeed.
I think the success of an ICO is directly related to team. Also, I think it is a really low possibility that an ICO which has not an innovative idea can be successful. And finally I can say that, good communication is a very important factor.
Hey guys, I am trying to develop a model to price and score ICOs. I believe this model can potentially help a lot of people. By developing a model that is as objective as possible, I can start to accurately rank and score ICOs. This will help to weed through all of the scams and junk out there. I just wanted to know what are some objective criteria that you use???
The things I can think of so far.
Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...
I appreciate any input! Thanks
Personally, I use indicators such as the team, the level of popularity and the amount that the project wants to collect. Since many projects too many allow themselves, they collect huge sums of money and do nothing The things I can think of so far.
Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...
I appreciate any input! Thanks
The more criteria you consider, the better. I usually start with the title of the project, it should be understandable and pleasant to pronounce otherwise the matter will not go far.
as expending use with details of customs with returns from works of the modest examination,
investors might collects with request as gathering numbers with the target on projection as referring the limit as exchanging expends on decision as submitting risks to put with the table of market with the platform.
investors might collects with request as gathering numbers with the target on projection as referring the limit as exchanging expends on decision as submitting risks to put with the table of market with the platform.
This is good from cryptorangutang.
There are a lot of discussions on this topic at the forum. I think there should be a smart contract and you need to read the white paper
Ranking a project is subject to the investment needs of an individual but I would say I rank projects n can only invest in them if:
- They have a working product
- Have already existing business
- Ability to fill a missing gap n fulfil needs people didn't think they needed.
- Good marketing head
- Community support (not hypes) etc
- They have a working product
- Have already existing business
- Ability to fill a missing gap n fulfil needs people didn't think they needed.
- Good marketing head
- Community support (not hypes) etc
In addition to the foregoing, I draw attention to the bounty manager who leads the project. Practice shows that a competent approach to project PR is the key to success.
If they have a person that is willing to stay online pretty much all day then they can get more business. I'd want to see something like that while having something other than a coin.
You have given good analysis on what to check out for before purchasing or participating in an ICO. Among of points, i would like to add that a coin or an ICO that will success, would have started following her roadmap right from the inception of the project. If there is any bridge in the roadmap, the ICO might likely not succeed.
In addition to the foregoing, I draw attention to the bounty manager who leads the project. Practice shows that a competent approach to project PR is the key to success.
Hey guys, I am trying to develop a model to price and score ICOs. I believe this model can potentially help a lot of people. By developing a model that is as objective as possible, I can start to accurately rank and score ICOs. This will help to weed through all of the scams and junk out there. I just wanted to know what are some objective criteria that you use???
The things I can think of so far.
Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...
I appreciate any input! Thanks
Look at rating agencies, although they get money for reviews and I wouldn't believe them, they use similar methodology to score ICOs. So, your model is up-to-date , but I would add size of community and brand awareness The things I can think of so far.
Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...
I appreciate any input! Thanks
Jump to: