Topic: What criteria do you use to analyze ICOs? - page 3. (Read 430 times)
First of all I am reading about ICO team information, in particular its important to understand how trustworthy they are,or for example how many developers,PR managers,etc they have.If they have enaugh qualification and good PR manager,also how trustworthy are their social pages,programers and other,anyway there are a lot of small details which you need to define because there are a lot of fake projects and it will not be good to lose trust from socity.the idea is not bad if people use it to find ICOs with really good potential.
Different users have different criteria in analyzing the ICO success.. Most of the time I give consideration to the real time use of the respective project behind the particular ico.
Guys, there is excellent thread about it. May be you go to there https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-to-invest-in-ico-more-safely-checklist-2822896 ? Author mahe hard work. And all opinions in one place will be better than everywhere
Hi. I think, main criterion is idea and mission of project, team and, activity social media of project.
I like to do that as well along with talking to the people that are in the project. If they don't know how to do anything then the project is a dud.
The following can help out,ensure you analyse and clearly state your roadmap and Market target.
I think there are several criteria but the following matters a lot to me.
1) Gap in current environment - A solution is needed and this ICO is the first to come up with the solution
2) Team members and advisor with previous success - If members or advisors had previous ICO success, thats a good point
3) A MVP or prototype - A minimum viable product or a prototype
These are some criteria that I look for to analyze an ICO.
1) Gap in current environment - A solution is needed and this ICO is the first to come up with the solution
2) Team members and advisor with previous success - If members or advisors had previous ICO success, thats a good point
3) A MVP or prototype - A minimum viable product or a prototype
These are some criteria that I look for to analyze an ICO.
Hi. I think, main criterion is idea and mission of project, team and, activity social media of project.
Hey guys, I am trying to develop a model to price and score ICOs. I believe this model can potentially help a lot of people. By developing a model that is as objective as possible, I can start to accurately rank and score ICOs. This will help to weed through all of the scams and junk out there. I just wanted to know what are some objective criteria that you use???
The things I can think of so far.
Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...
I appreciate any input! Thanks
The things I can think of so far.
Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...
I appreciate any input! Thanks
Jump to: