Topic: What do you think about Kucoin Voting Competition ? (Read 372 times)
What matters to an exchange is the passenger flow. Vote on the currency, this is good, although many of the coins are airdrops. However, attracting a lot of traffic is important to the exchange.
Kucoin is one of any big exchange market and make an altcoin have great potential when listed on kucoin, but I think vote is not good solution of making altcoin price higher. Many ico have schedule and road map about their token market and have how much their token price when listed on exchange market later.
For listing by vote like this I think which project/coin has bigger community will be the winner 
. And it's fair if you don't wanna pay BTC for Kucoin to be listed .
Airdrop for voting is a good way to attracted people to vote for any project/coin to be listed on kucoin but at the moment I think almost new projects and coins often pay attention to big exchange like Binance cause it's the best place to be listed at the moment.
. And it's fair if you don't wanna pay BTC for Kucoin to be listed . Airdrop for voting is a good way to attracted people to vote for any project/coin to be listed on kucoin but at the moment I think almost new projects and coins often pay attention to big exchange like Binance cause it's the best place to be listed at the moment
. As all we Know this kind of competition needs community. Most of the projects gives huge amount of airdrops to their voters. Winners will be at the and airdropers Why do you think your voted coin must be listed Kucoin.
I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
majority of the voters are paid thats why majority of the coin list so fast to some exchangers that need vote. i see lot of this coin asking for vote and trade for their coins. I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
It should be a rule for coins devs to not be allowed to pay the members that voted for them. People should vote just because they want the coin to get listed on Kucoin, not in order to gain more coins.
As all we Know this kind of competition needs community. Most of the projects gives huge amount of airdrops to their voters. Winners will be at the and airdropers Why do you think your voted coin must be listed Kucoin.
I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
I think this is really a marketing form. It looks like recently some small Trade-exchanges that accepted to users listed their coins which they want it to trade in market. On the user side, this is also good way to trade new tokens
This is only the strategy of kucoin exchange to gain more follower/trader in thier platform. I think kucoin objectives is only to expand community thats why they do a voting competitions for free listing and most voted coin by the community will become the winner. I think there is nothing wrong about that, only the coins participants doing a dirty games they teach community to cheat like creating multiple accounts in order to do multiple votes. Thats not fair to other coins who did a clean fights.
Kucoin wants their token to be bought by new users everyday so that they can increase their KCS value which also mean the value of KCS which is under the name of team will also increase, ultimately increasing the overall valuation of the platform. They have this voting competition just for that. But I hate when few ICO put money to get listed just after ICO without making any development on their product. They just want to trade their tokens without offering anything and keep pushing their deadline for other developments.
Voting aims to take the most votes from the community of a coin. If the community wins the voting, then their coin will be listing for free. And this is also done Binance.
I think I like the kucoin community voting free listing competition. It's done only once in a while so every project will want to take the opportunity to get listed in a decent exchange like kucoin for free. It show that community can decide the fate of a token and gives power to them.
Such votes often have a great deal of fraud. By airdrop when voting. Each person will create multiple accounts to vote for more rewards. So it's not really fair. And many votes are virtual.
As long as KuCoin doesn't spam the Ethereum network with multiple transactions from multiple different ethereum addresses like other stupid exchanges did, it is ok in my opinion. Getting community involved in a healthy way is good.
I think its a good chance for projects with low cap, those projects doesnt have money for listing, so the community of the project can help it, thats great idea actually!
I like Kucoin voting pattern, it's not like other exchanges that will charge you to vote for a coin, rather they decided to vote through telegram and I believe they have put things in check to determine how to remove people who might want to abuse the vote. So it is the real community that will decide which coin to be listed.
I DON,T LIKE VOTING COINS. You know the developers who made succesful ICo will not ask the communitu to vote to lst the voin. Voting to list is free of charge. I think the developers have no much cash to list the coin. Coin like that wiill drop in price
i agree with you, actually the voting event is very unnecessary followed for them, developers should be able to prove that they are really serious in the project, this they can prove with bold to pay to the market to get in the list. of course members will be much more trusting than free listing.
I never participate in voting, even if I have those coins which I can vote for. Why? That's simple. I'm too lazy for this stuff. There's no point in wasting my time cause I know I won't affect this) Probably, it's not right but I believe if the project is really good, any voting on KuCoin won't influence its development. Good projects don't need these formalities!
Its not announced but It seems that Apollo team has won the voting competition. What is the main reason of their success for your opinion?
Airdrop ? Big community? A good project?
Airdrop ? Big community? A good project?
To my mind such competitions are a paradise for scams and unfair play. Of course, KuCoin gave an amazing chance for crypto communities to get listed free. But it drastically lacked a good organisation. Obviously the organisation of such activities must be more well-thought. Hope they'll draw the right conclusions, make some improvements, and will come back with the same initiative one more time to give one more chance to another community. And hope that other exchanges will follow their example.
As all we Know this kind of competition needs community. Most of the projects gives huge amount of airdrops to their voters. Winners will be at the and airdropers Why do you think your voted coin must be listed Kucoin.
I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
First of all most of the voters who voted love airdrops and secondly other voted cause they support the project they voted for, and this is their best chance to get listed on one of the big exchange to get noticed.
As far as myself is concerned, I too voted for the project I support and love it to get listed on Kucoin exchange.
The contests are mostly won by teams that have traded on the Kucoin exchange for a long time.
I do not believe that an ordinary person can win a contest
I do not believe that an ordinary person can win a contest
Jump to: