Topic: What do you think about Kucoin Voting Competition ? - page 2. (Read 472 times)
I do think it's a great thig they did for putting that up
Not so sure about the voting competition as the room for fraud is very great. Kucoin is an awesome place to trade however so hopefully they have some good security in place to stop any funny business.
I think this voting competition will benefit kucoin more than the tokens, they are actually invading all these communities that all these communities have, they are leveraging to targetted crypto communities from their they will attract thousands of new users, traders and investors, so i think its good time to buy more kcs ;P
KuCoin voting competition is a healthy way of knowing how the crypto community accepts a project. It also give a chance for the tokens project to be listed in an exchange with the support of its subscribers. The robot app of coin do not allow multiple voting of the project by the same subscriber and the result as I see it is just fair.
It should not only be for the crypto community that accepts a project. First yes but there are other outsite ppl.
As all we Know this kind of competition needs community. Most of the projects gives huge amount of airdrops to their voters. Winners will be at the and airdropers Why do you think your voted coin must be listed Kucoin.
I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
The majority of them are paying their communities to spam the vote and it can't be a good thing in my opinion. The dev will try to do everything to spam their coin with bunch of votes. I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
I thought that is not a healthy thing and it should be changed. That looks so terrible
As all we Know this kind of competition needs community. Most of the projects gives huge amount of airdrops to their voters. Winners will be at the and airdropers Why do you think your voted coin must be listed Kucoin.
I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
I personally believe the voting campaign for listing a coin on exchanges is a strategy to promote and advertise the exchange and coins to be listed on the exchange between cryptocurrency audience.
Good hype around new listing it's always good. It's help to project and exchange to involve more people and create very cool community.
this is actually a difficult thing for me because of a very tight competition and a lot of ico who give free coin so that his coin can be selected when voting in kucoin, what I really want a very good project without any seduction would have many votes
I DON,T LIKE VOTING COINS. You know the developers who made succesful ICo will not ask the communitu to vote to lst the voin. Voting to list is free of charge. I think the developers have no much cash to list the coin. Coin like that wiill drop in price
But as we already now most of the projects can not get enough funded because of the bear market condition now. If the project is good but they did not funded enough; it is better to get the change listed free of charge. Then they can use that listing money as a project development supply.
Kucoin exchange has been one of the best cryptocurrency exchanges and I really like their voting process, it's easier for voters to follow. The only thing I do not understand is the option which make possible such that a single telegram user can vote multiple coins, after voting the first coin, then move to vote the second one and continues like that. I feel that shouldn't be. In my own opinion, a telegram user is suppose to be eligible to vote only one coin in the voting list.
The problem is; if they give us one chance for voting then most bigger airdrop given coin will win. I think this usual way is better. The important point is they need to check all the votes strictly.
Kucoin exchange has been one of the best cryptocurrency exchanges and I really like their voting process, it's easier for voters to follow. The only thing I do not understand is the option which make possible such that a single telegram user can vote multiple coins, after voting the first coin, then move to vote the second one and continues like that. I feel that shouldn't be. In my own opinion, a telegram user is suppose to be eligible to vote only one coin in the voting list.
I DON,T LIKE VOTING COINS. You know the developers who made succesful ICo will not ask the communitu to vote to lst the voin. Voting to list is free of charge. I think the developers have no much cash to list the coin. Coin like that wiill drop in price
I think this is a gooe thing, KuCoin is great exchange pretty huge marketcap, but they should listen to the community more often, and this is one of the way. Though there are still many flaws in their voting system, some projects are cheating using bot (and maybe other method). So KuCoin team should check further about the winning projects.
I think this mode can only bring a lot of traffic to Kucoin.
However, it has no effect on the project team, because the trading volume of kucoin exchange is very low.
However, it has no effect on the project team, because the trading volume of kucoin exchange is very low.
I think it’s good
It have made sure there are a lot of airdrops lately and also it helped increased kucoin participants list too
So on the positives, it is a very good move
I read there are a few projects which cheated, let’s wait to find out the judgement
It have made sure there are a lot of airdrops lately and also it helped increased kucoin participants list too
So on the positives, it is a very good move
I read there are a few projects which cheated, let’s wait to find out the judgement
As all we Know this kind of competition needs community. Most of the projects gives huge amount of airdrops to their voters. Winners will be at the and airdropers Why do you think your voted coin must be listed Kucoin.
I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
kucoin is a great exchanger and you can guarantee its security. it is also has a huge trading volume daily and there's a lot of listed coin. I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
KUCOIN is indeed one of the best category exchange. The voting system introduced by the KuCoin was to encourage KUCOIN community to help KuCoin to list their favourite coin or token. But this voting competition was not at all looking healthy as lot of projects were offering airdrops to get them listed on the exchange.
I just hope there wont be manipulations just like Mercator where King, classy coin and a few others were removed for manipulating votes. if kucoin admin are strict, then only projects with a large community will be able to win. i voted for APPOLO i hope they win.
As all we Know this kind of competition needs community. Most of the projects gives huge amount of airdrops to their voters. Winners will be at the and airdropers Why do you think your voted coin must be listed Kucoin.
I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
The majority of them are paying their communities to spam the vote and it can't be a good thing in my opinion. The dev will try to do everything to spam their coin with bunch of votes. I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.
What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.
I thought that is not a healthy thing and it should be changed. That looks so terrible
But as I know its not easy to vote multible times because you need a account which is registered from kucoin before the voting starts. So bigger airdrop community win the voting.
If the exchange does not expressly prohibit it in its rules, I don't see any problem. The project that wins the competition saves the money that would have to pay for the listing and also receives $30,000 in the form of a marketing package. There is nothing wrong in distributing a part of that money among the users who vote for them.
Jump to: