Topic: What do you think about the actual world conflicts? - page 2. (Read 1978 times)

Source for your claims ?

No evidence at all, as I said, these are my own suspicions. Rumors have already started that there are suspected cases in Saudi Arabia, and that sort of confirms my suspicions.

"Then, US starts intervening in Middle East, and they make a mess out of it, trying to get more oil and failing. They release some Ebola on the West Coast of Africa, as an attempt to quiet things down, but it doesn't work, and I tell you, some epidemic will "emerge" in the Middle East too. The USA is planning that, and I suspect they're going to use the MERS for that."
You say the US release Ebola to Africa! Are you sure the US have done this evil things? Any evidence?

That too, I should've phrased my statement properly. Russia wants more territory, and the USA want too, so they start fighting in Ukraine.
That's what I meant. They've had a grudge for many years, and that grudge is still there.

It is not Russia, but the US which is fighting for more territory. The CIA toppled a democratically elected government in Ukraine and replaced it with neo-Nazis from the Right Sector.

Pfff... It's quite simple. Russia wants more territory, USA wants to prevent that, so they start fighting in Ukraine, as if it were the old Cold War times. USA is stupid and puts sanctions on Russia, when Russia can cripple the US Dollar. Stupid.

Then, US starts intervening in Middle East, and they make a mess out of it, trying to get more oil and failing. They release some Ebola on the West Coast of Africa, as an attempt to quiet things down, but it doesn't work, and I tell you, some epidemic will "emerge" in the Middle East too. The USA is planning that, and I suspect they're going to use the MERS for that.

Meanwhile, China is being pressurized by Vietnam, USA, Japan and other countries, since China is rapidly expanding and the other can't stop it. China will get the islands they are arguing over with, even if they have to use force. So we shall at least see a small war over there.

And all of this are my own suspicions.

Hopefully russia can over come its paranoia and understand that true enemy lies to the east, not west.

In terms of the middle east, they can be trucked into the ovens for all anyone should care. Aside from Israel, rest of the middle east is merely reaping what they have sown. I would fully support the genocide of all arabs and muslims from that region, let them have a little taste of what they have done for the last 2000 years using any excuse they can scrape from the bottom of the barrel.

Outcome of over population with limited resources.

Most wars are necessary evils. Unfortunately today's wars are not necessary. Palestine is attacking Israel for no reason, and Israel is trying to defend themselves. Russia is trying to get more influence in Europe and is more or less invading the Ukraine. I would not be entirely surprised if we were to see world war 3 start in the Ukraine, although hopefully this will not happen.

What you know about that? Why only Russia and Ukraine? Look around the Europe Livia.Iraq Iran Siria Palestine Afganistan. Starting make some noise around Serbia and PriDnestrovie. Romania send  old tanks and same force machines to Ukraine. Polish NATO base forces standing in alert mode and is ready to enter the territory of Ukraine and etc. This is the result of NATO policy aimed at the destruction of half a century Russia to seize natural resources which is covered by the slogan of becoming "democracy." Look what has made this form of "democracy" Serbiyu.Latviyu Yugoslavia Iran Iraq Libya now unfortunately trying to do the same thing with Ukraine. Countries such as Germany United Kingdom Italy Spain Turkey Greece Netherlands Austria Poland, Finland and so on, have a long history and feel fine until the United States and even more so before entering the "dollar" zone and the emergence of "democratic" system. Provakatsionnaya aggressive policy of NATO in Russia's attitude can lead to the beginning of the Third World War, unfortunately for all of us. China currently has a highly trained and mentally prepared army of 450 milion people. And does not conduct aggressive policy against any state, although having an army and not backward equipment a chance to win even having gone to war against the whole world. Obama will make every effort to start a war, if there is no war, there would be no Obama and the desirability of NATO will be a big question. From someone constantly "protected" representatives in Washington?

From what I hear fracking barely does a thing for the amount of trouble and gas it brings but I'd need to do more research into it before I can say for definite, it certainly doesn't seem very efficient to practically demolish the underground for a tiny bit of gas from what I've seen so far.

Well I guess if man had a natural enemy, it would then be us against them. I think you would then see a lot less 'bickering' amongst humans.
The thing is we're conquered our way to the very top of the food chain. When there is nothing left to conquer, there's still one last thing left to conquer. Oneself.
Unless humanity veers off it's current path, obliteration of our species is the only possible outcome  

RE middle east, simple question.

If there was no conflicts and all was well in the middle east, wouldn't the price of oil drop?

(I gotta feeling the fracking industry in the USA is going to make these sick puppies irrelevant...)

Hey folks,

what do you think about the recent conflicts (russia, ukrain)
and espescially the middle east conflict??

regards,
bitsta