Pages:
Author

Topic: What do you think in the future on DONALD TRUMP in his term of presidency ? (Read 7301 times)

legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
The stock market is up and unemployment is down.  North Korea & US are talking ....

Talking?

Hello?

Buried personnel mines are being removed jointly both sides of the DMZ.

That's frikking YUGE!!!!
jr. member
Activity: 31
Merit: 1
The stock market is up and unemployment is down.  North Korea & US are talking for the first time since the end of the Clinton Administration with Madeleine Albright.  Iran is being economically squeezed and its proxies are being exposed for drug running to fund terrorist activities as opposed to being coddled by the last administration.  What is not a laughing matter is that Trump pulled out of the Paris climate agreement which may have been very reckless….too early to see. 
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 42
The rising tide lifts all boats
...she [A Merkel] thought the Syrians are civilized people like the Turks, but it was not so...
Syrian society is layered like any other.
Obviously, refugees that had to run away are less civilized than the upper layers.

I think the future for Donald Trump is bright.
He pretended to be idiot, his enemies believed him, and got lured into his trap.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
Donald Trump is making some serious mistakes in his presedential tenure. He needs to review his decision. The current situation with Turkey is very serious. He needs to realize that his actions could start World War III. Russia also have some serious tensions with Donald Trump.

No kidding? Wait, they were all telling us that he was colluding with Russia.

You don't suppose maybe it's they - those other people that are making the serious mistakes and not Trump?
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile
He's probably going to fail miserably at some point. He's a great businessman but a country is not a company (or maybe it is)..
Come on
a nutless monkey could do a better job than most nations leaders

When you can start adding 1+1=2
There is no stopping you..
1. People want natural organic food chemical free (Food+Natural=Healthy)
2. People want climate change (Clean Water+More Trees=Air)
and so on and so on

People in power will call you stupid for making things simple
But smart people know to use the KISS method - Keep it simple stupid

I don't think it's that simple. Being a nation's leader is not an easy job.

If you say. I will agree with you then.
Lets see if Mr business man can at least bring North Korea to the table
That would be some great political feat no other politician has achieved


Oh wait it already happened
This trump guy, damn I wish he were not alt right all the time
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
He's probably going to fail miserably at some point. He's a great businessman but a country is not a company (or maybe it is)..


Come on
a nutless monkey could do a better job than most nations leaders



When you can start adding 1+1=2
There is no stopping you..


1. People want natural organic food chemical free (Food+Natural=Healthy)

2. People want climate change (Clean Water+More Trees=Air)

and so on and so on



People in power will call you stupid for making things simple

But smart people know to use the KISS method - Keep it simple stupid


I don't think it's that simple. Being a nation's leader is not an easy job.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile
He's probably going to fail miserably at some point. He's a great businessman but a country is not a company (or maybe it is)..


Come on
a nutless monkey could do a better job than most nations leaders



When you can start adding 1+1=2
There is no stopping you..


1. People want natural organic food chemical free (Food+Natural=Healthy)

2. People want climate change (Clean Water+More Trees=Air)

and so on and so on



People in power will call you stupid for making things simple

But smart people know to use the KISS method - Keep it simple stupid
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
He's probably going to fail miserably at some point. He's a great businessman but a country is not a company (or maybe it is)..
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
I think he will have a big statue saying .

             THE DEAL MAKER 
The man who saved the USA from collapse
           MR DONALD J TRUMP

And then the stories   NO good stories Wink Cheesy Cheesy

Mr trump is doing what his people voted for and they are so pleased   i am for them ..
The USA has created so many jobs for the poor fired up factories and lifting so many lives out of poverty ..

Remember money is not work people work ..
Make a vase and smash it   now replace it <that promises someone else to do work ..

The ticket doesn't do the work the humans do ..
Money is a pretend to trick you into being a slave ..

So why not give a UNIVERSAL INCOME then people can choose to be a slave ..
People will work even if they get a universal income ..

10K starting point to live will not get you a nice home or a boat or a villa   just about live     so in order to get those nice things in life we must work ..
Then just thinks no one will care about free movement ..

BUT no you want the free movement because it keeps the citizens busy with terror so you can spend our taxes on what you like ?..
SO why not give a UNIVERSAL INCOME   then you can do what you likes    ..

You get it when reach 21 years old everyone gets it till you die even if you find work or become rich you still get your UNIVERSAL INCOME..
The nobody can ever say they never had a chance in life because everyone did   ..
Your on 10k a year if in the UK plus you can find work ..If you go wrong it's your fault no one else ..

200 pounds job a week plus your universal income  will be enough for you to do something else as in move up the ladder ..
And that a small amount 200 a week ..Some will be lazy but the many wont be ..
So why do people make more monies ?   So why will a UNIVERSAL INCOME stop people wanting to make even more Undecided
wouldn't the rich just stop then?.. NO you want more so you can have nice things in life FACT..
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
indictment incoming, that's what I think
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile
Standing on the outside looking in

I am not a US citizen

North Korea lost the war to the CIA in 1953, the CIA just did not tell anyone.
Trump was able to cease control of the CIA and blow up the nuclear base (This happened, NK mountain implodes)
Everything else was a show to ease the public into a peaceful solution with North Korea


Kim is a Manchurian candidate
I love his pudgy gaming face and body that adores basketball and obviously junk food
Knows nothing, does nothing, you only ever hear a newspaper speak


next the Manchurian candidate run Iranian dictatorship


I wonder if trump will explore the option of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_Doctrine
Britain, Europe, Australia certainly did something nasty in this IG report




As far as I can see I support who is behind Donald Trump and he supports them, so far so good


Robert F Kennedy - Mercury Project
Andrew Jackson - I Killed the Banks
John G Trump - Physicist FBI Tesla Files


legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
Clinton: Send some immigrant kids home - YouTube
Video for Clinton's child immigrants 2014▶ 2:41
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1FP6t0OUlk
18 Jun 2014 - Uploaded by CNN
Clinton: Send some immigrant kids home. CNN. Loading... Unsubscribe from CNN? ... Published on Jun 18

linton In 2014: Immigrant Children “Should Be Sent Back” - YouTube
Video for Clinton's child immigrants 2014▶ 1:06
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwTmN2wbJ0A
12 Feb 2016 - Uploaded by America Rising ICYMI
Clinton In 2014: Immigrant Children “Should Be Sent Back”. America Rising ICYMI. Loading... Unsubscribe from ...


So OK for Clinton Bush Obama   BUT when trump does the same thing    Trump is the devil Roll Eyes Cheesy..
Oh how the media trick STUPID PEOPLES MINDS  Kiss..

At least check on google to see what you complain about that the person your sticking up for hasn't done the same thing Wink Kiss Kiss..

Now are you all going to also complain about BUSH CLINTON AND OBAMA? Roll Eyes

IDIOT HUMANS ..
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
Trump will win another 4 years easy  Grin..
Media played stupid games for the political elite and now they will pay for many many years to come.. Grin

Look at the date WHAT DOES IT SAY?

Why are so many children trying to cross the US border? - BBC News
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-28203923
30 Sep 2014 - Many children are being held in crowded detention centres, ... President George Bush prevents the US from returning children who are not from .

Gary Tuchman explores why there has been a rise in child immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border in recent months. More from CNN at http://www.cnn.com/

Child immigrants creating US border crisis - BBC News - BBC.com
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-echochambers-27874901
16 Jun 2014 - There is a surge of unaccompanied minors crossing into the US along its southern border that is overwhelming US facilities and creating a political dilemma ... In the 2013 fiscal year, the US Border Patrol caught 38,833 juveniles .... The plight of the detained children is putting a painfully human face on the . LOOK AT THE DATE Roll Eyes Roll Eyes..

Orphaned by deportation: the crisis of American children left behind ...
https://www.theguardian.com/.../2014/.../immigration-boy-reform-obama-deportation...
15 Oct 2014 - Andrés Sr spent months in a detention facility in Florida before he was forced to ... A 2013 report by Human Impact Partners found that nearly 75% of ... Immigration groups expect Obama to curb deportations and grant relief to the ..... And to use a child by putting words into his mouth is as Evil as you can get.



Hillary Clinton Defends Call To Deport Child Migrants | HuffPost
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/.../hillary-clinton-child-migrants_us_55d4a5c5e4b05...
08/19/2015 01:56 pm ET. Hillary Clinton Defends Call To Deport Child Migrants ... Now that the border crisis has largely passed, however, Clinton said U.S. immigration authorities should focus on expediting the deportation cases of children


legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
Trump Nominated For Nobel Peace Prize - And The Internet Is Freaking Out





Following what appears to be a successful first meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, U.S. President Donald Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by two Norwegian lawmakers. Though the deadline for this year's prize has already passed, the nomination should make Trump eligible for the prize in 2019.

Fortune writes:

U.S. President Donald Trump was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in reaching an agreement to work toward de-nuclearization of the Korean peninsula.

Nominations for the world's most coveted prize are open to lawmakers, academics and researchers from around the world. The Nobel Committee in Oslo typically receives hundreds of nominations each year, and past candidates have also included Russian President Vladimir Putin and Former Cuban leader Fidel Castro. A record 330 people were nominated this year.

While supporters of the President are praising the nomination as evidence of Trump's good will and desire to maintain stability and world peace on the Korean Peninsula, not everyone agrees.

Leading left-leaning web site The Huffington Post highlighted in a headline that the lawmakers who voted for trump were part of Norway's far right:


Read more and click the links at http://www.dcclothesline.com/2018/06/14/trump-nominated-for-nobel-peace-prize-and-the-internet-is-freaking-out/.


Cool
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
Now name one other specific aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

If Merkel was a little bit less authoritarian, then the United Kingdom would have been still a part of the European Union. The Brexit happened solely as a result of Merkel's romance with Erdogan.
Where did you get information about a romantic relationship Merkel and Erdogan? This is probably fake? Germany is indeed a very large Turkish community. And the Turks behave in Germany quite well. It was formed before the arrival of Merkel in politics. But it seems to me that she thought the Syrians are civilized people like the Turks, but it was not so.
legendary
Activity: 3724
Merit: 3063
Leave no FUD unchallenged
Now name one other specific aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

If Merkel was a little bit less authoritarian, then the United Kingdom would have been still a part of the European Union. The Brexit happened solely as a result of Merkel's romance with Erdogan.

I love how you think freedom of movement is authoritarian.  It's adorable.  Telling people where they can and can't go is authoritarian.  You are the authoritarian, only you're too blinded by your hate to see it.

As someone who lives in the UK, I can assure you that Brexit only happened because the tabloids and the politicians constantly scapegoat foreign people and the public are gullible enough to buy it.  Parties like UKIP carried on where the BNP and EDL left off.  They somehow managed to legitimise casual racism and discrimination.  People have become increasingly isolationist and xenophobic.  Brexit wouldn't have happened if Britain hadn't become an island primarily populated by easily misled bigots.  I'm ashamed that I get lumped in with the rest of the populace by association.

Still, the fascists will do what they always do.  Take it too far.  Then people will remember how dangerous you are.  Then all you "alt-right" goons will be marginalised for another few decades.  Enjoy your time in the sun.  It won't last.  


I'm suggesting that your advocacy of the goodness of Dodd-Frank if not without any factual basis, is too strong to be credible.

I'm suggesting that your advocacy of the goodness of Trump if not without any factual basis, is too strong to be credible.

I guess we'll let history be the judge.
legendary
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Now name one other specific aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

If Merkel was a little bit less authoritarian, then the United Kingdom would have been still a part of the European Union. The Brexit happened solely as a result of Merkel's romance with Erdogan.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
You don't buy that there were unsound and unsafe banking practices that led to the 2008 crash?  Or you don't buy that the law curbs some of those risks?  You're defending a move which is clearly profitable for bankers and increases the risk of casino-style banking and the threat of future bailouts/bailins.  Incontrovertibly, not having to pay for the mistakes of the finance sector is in the benefit of the little man.  If you have any dealings in fiat, it's in your benefit not to pay for those mistakes either.

I'm not saying Dodd-Frank was perfect, by any means, but opening the floodgates to irresponsible lending, reckless derivatives speculation, corruption and general instability is dumb.
.....
Assuming that a large and complex piece of legislation written by bankers for bankers has any relation at all to the bolded above is really not logical.  Think about it.  How many bankers went to jail?  Why?

America's inability to prosecute bankers isn't in question.  We know that's never going to change regardless of what regulatory measures are or aren't in place.  Although to answer your question, some argue it's around 35, but Dodd-Frank probably wasn't pertinent to all of them.  Sure, if more punitive measures had been involved in drafting that legislation, more banksters would be locked up.  And some critics did complain that the law didn't go far enough in that regard.  But how the immoral activities are punished isn't the question here.  It's how you define which activities are permissible and which aren't permissible to begin with.  That emphasis will now shift because the focus is now on keeping the money flowing at all costs, whereas before it was keeping the money flowing while taking safe practices into consideration.  Repealing the legislation means a greater number of questionable practices will be deemed permissible than before.  Complexity and authorship aside, this is a dangerous change in ethos.

Also, don't pretend for a second that the puppetmasters behind this deregulation aren't banksters:

Quote
The president had praise for Jamie Dimon, whose bank, JPMorgan Chase, was often a target of regulatory actions by the Obama administration.
“There’s nobody better to tell me about Dodd-Frank than Jamie, so you’re going to tell me about it,” Mr. Trump said.

The meeting underscored the degree to which the architects of Mr. Trump’s economic strategy are now some of the people he denounced in his campaign, which ended with a commercial that described “a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations.”

The advertisement flashed an image of the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, which has become a virtual feeder for top Trump administration officials. Steven Mnuchin, his nominee for Treasury secretary; Gary Cohn, the chairman of his national economic council; and Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, all had worked at Goldman.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/03/business/dealbook/trump-congress-financial-regulations.html

Quite literally, the lunatics are taking over the asylum.  The banksters call the shots now.  Yet you cry that banksters wrote the legislation, so getting rid of it must be great.  Even though it's banksters getting rid of it?  Yeah, sounds logical.   Roll Eyes
You are making things up.  I'm not crying. 

I'm suggesting that your advocacy of the goodness of Dodd-Frank if not without any factual basis, is too strong to be credible.

legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
You don't buy that there were unsound and unsafe banking practices that led to the 2008 crash?  Or you don't buy that the law curbs some of those risks?  You're defending a move which is clearly profitable for bankers and increases the risk of casino-style banking and the threat of future bailouts/bailins.  Incontrovertibly, not having to pay for the mistakes of the finance sector is in the benefit of the little man.  If you have any dealings in fiat, it's in your benefit not to pay for those mistakes either.

I'm not saying Dodd-Frank was perfect, by any means, but opening the floodgates to irresponsible lending, reckless derivatives speculation, corruption and general instability is dumb.
.....
Assuming that a large and complex piece of legislation written by bankers for bankers has any relation at all to the bolded above is really not logical.  Think about it.  How many bankers went to jail?  Why?

America's inability to prosecute bankers isn't in question.  We know that's never going to change regardless of what regulatory measures are or aren't in place.  Although to answer your question, some argue it's around 35, but Dodd-Frank probably wasn't pertinent to all of them.  Sure, if more punitive measures had been involved in drafting that legislation, more banksters would be locked up.  And some critics did complain that the law didn't go far enough in that regard.  But how the immoral activities are punished isn't the question here.  It's how you define which activities are permissible and which aren't permissible to begin with.  That emphasis will now shift because the focus is now on keeping the money flowing at all costs, whereas before it was keeping the money flowing while taking safe practices into consideration.  Repealing the legislation means a greater number of questionable practices will be deemed permissible than before.  Complexity and authorship aside, this is a dangerous change in ethos.

Also, don't pretend for a second that the puppetmasters behind this deregulation aren't banksters:

Quote
The president had praise for Jamie Dimon, whose bank, JPMorgan Chase, was often a target of regulatory actions by the Obama administration.
“There’s nobody better to tell me about Dodd-Frank than Jamie, so you’re going to tell me about it,” Mr. Trump said.

The meeting underscored the degree to which the architects of Mr. Trump’s economic strategy are now some of the people he denounced in his campaign, which ended with a commercial that described “a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations.”

The advertisement flashed an image of the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, which has become a virtual feeder for top Trump administration officials. Steven Mnuchin, his nominee for Treasury secretary; Gary Cohn, the chairman of his national economic council; and Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, all had worked at Goldman.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/03/business/dealbook/trump-congress-financial-regulations.html

Quite literally, the lunatics are taking over the asylum.  The banksters call the shots now.  Yet you cry that banksters wrote the legislation, so getting rid of it must be great.  Even though it's banksters getting rid of it?  Yeah, sounds logical.   Roll Eyes

This is prime example of cognitive bias.
Unable to see the wood for the trees.
legendary
Activity: 3724
Merit: 3063
Leave no FUD unchallenged
You don't buy that there were unsound and unsafe banking practices that led to the 2008 crash?  Or you don't buy that the law curbs some of those risks?  You're defending a move which is clearly profitable for bankers and increases the risk of casino-style banking and the threat of future bailouts/bailins.  Incontrovertibly, not having to pay for the mistakes of the finance sector is in the benefit of the little man.  If you have any dealings in fiat, it's in your benefit not to pay for those mistakes either.

I'm not saying Dodd-Frank was perfect, by any means, but opening the floodgates to irresponsible lending, reckless derivatives speculation, corruption and general instability is dumb.
.....
Assuming that a large and complex piece of legislation written by bankers for bankers has any relation at all to the bolded above is really not logical.  Think about it.  How many bankers went to jail?  Why?

America's inability to prosecute bankers isn't in question.  We know that's never going to change regardless of what regulatory measures are or aren't in place.  Although to answer your question, some argue it's around 35, but Dodd-Frank probably wasn't pertinent to all of them.  Sure, if more punitive measures had been involved in drafting that legislation, more banksters would be locked up.  And some critics did complain that the law didn't go far enough in that regard.  But how the immoral activities are punished isn't the question here.  It's how you define which activities are permissible and which aren't permissible to begin with.  That emphasis will now shift because the focus is now on keeping the money flowing at all costs, whereas before it was keeping the money flowing while taking safe practices into consideration.  Repealing the legislation means a greater number of questionable practices will be deemed permissible than before.  Complexity and authorship aside, this is a dangerous change in ethos.

Also, don't pretend for a second that the puppetmasters behind this deregulation aren't banksters:

Quote
The president had praise for Jamie Dimon, whose bank, JPMorgan Chase, was often a target of regulatory actions by the Obama administration.
“There’s nobody better to tell me about Dodd-Frank than Jamie, so you’re going to tell me about it,” Mr. Trump said.

The meeting underscored the degree to which the architects of Mr. Trump’s economic strategy are now some of the people he denounced in his campaign, which ended with a commercial that described “a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations.”

The advertisement flashed an image of the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, which has become a virtual feeder for top Trump administration officials. Steven Mnuchin, his nominee for Treasury secretary; Gary Cohn, the chairman of his national economic council; and Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, all had worked at Goldman.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/03/business/dealbook/trump-congress-financial-regulations.html

Quite literally, the lunatics are taking over the asylum.  The banksters call the shots now.  Yet you cry that banksters wrote the legislation, so getting rid of it must be great.  Even though it's banksters getting rid of it?  Yeah, sounds logical.   Roll Eyes
Pages:
Jump to: