Pages:
Author

Topic: What do you think in the future on DONALD TRUMP in his term of presidency ? - page 2. (Read 7359 times)

hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 500
i wanna know your thoughts ^^
Trump are too old to handle kind of problems on his country USA is the most powerful country where he is the most powerful man trump already did some good but trump looks like always trolling and fooling people hoping trump will be a good president of america and all people will loved him soon.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
.....
Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.


You're defending a piece of complex legislation written by bankers for bankers, and asserting it's for the benefit of the little man.

I don't buy that.  Not one bit.

Neither have you offered a shred of evidence that your assertions have backing.

Neither does the article you quote support your personal faith in Dodd Frank.

You don't buy that there were unsound and unsafe banking practices that led to the 2008 crash?  Or you don't buy that the law curbs some of those risks?  You're defending a move which is clearly profitable for bankers and increases the risk of casino-style banking and the threat of future bailouts/bailins.  Incontrovertibly, not having to pay for the mistakes of the finance sector is in the benefit of the little man.  If you have any dealings in fiat, it's in your benefit not to pay for those mistakes either.

I'm not saying Dodd-Frank was perfect, by any means, but opening the floodgates to irresponsible lending, reckless derivatives speculation, corruption and general instability is dumb.
.....
Assuming that a large and complex piece of legislation written by bankers for bankers has any relation at all to the bolded above is really not logical.  Think about it.  How many bankers went to jail?  Why?
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 3191
Leave no FUD unchallenged
.....
Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.


You're defending a piece of complex legislation written by bankers for bankers, and asserting it's for the benefit of the little man.

I don't buy that.  Not one bit.

Neither have you offered a shred of evidence that your assertions have backing.

Neither does the article you quote support your personal faith in Dodd Frank.

You don't buy that there were unsound and unsafe banking practices that led to the 2008 crash?  Or you don't buy that the law curbs some of those risks?  You're defending a move which is clearly profitable for bankers and increases the risk of casino-style banking and the threat of future bailouts/bailins.  Incontrovertibly, not having to pay for the mistakes of the finance sector is in the benefit of the little man.  If you have any dealings in fiat, it's in your benefit not to pay for those mistakes either.

I'm not saying Dodd-Frank was perfect, by any means, but opening the floodgates to irresponsible lending, reckless derivatives speculation, corruption and general instability is dumb.


Merkel has destroyed her country and maybe all of Europe - what is she?
The Nazi reference suits Angela Merkel much better than anyone else. She single-handedly destroyed the European civilization by importing all these hordes of Muslims from the middle east.

If you can, imagine for just a second that you weren't both so spectacularly and obsessively intolerant of Muslims and actually had thoughts and feelings about other matters of governance.  I know it's a bit of a stretch, but just try to imagine it.  Now name one other aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

Stop this political correctness BS. I am intolerant of Muslims because the Muslims are intolerant of me. And regarding Merkel, her policies have been a disaster. She has caused the disintegration of the European Union, as a result of her authoritarian policies.

As soon as you stop this populist correctness BS.   Tongue

Care to name any specific authoritarian policies which aren't related to migration that are destroying Europe?  Or are you just pissing into the wind here?  Until I see that you are capable of taking off your hate-goggles and looking at the overall picture, I can't take you seriously.

As for Muslims, a tiny fraction of extremists are intolerant of you.  I'm fairly sure the average Muslim just thinks you're an irrelevant bigot not worth a second thought, but aside from that bears you no ill will.  The fact that you tar over a billion people with the same brush also does little for the possibility of me taking you seriously.

Now name one other specific aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Merkel has destroyed her country and maybe all of Europe - what is she?
The Nazi reference suits Angela Merkel much better than anyone else. She single-handedly destroyed the European civilization by importing all these hordes of Muslims from the middle east.

If you can, imagine for just a second that you weren't both so spectacularly and obsessively intolerant of Muslims and actually had thoughts and feelings about other matters of governance.  I know it's a bit of a stretch, but just try to imagine it.  Now name one other aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

Stop this political correctness BS. I am intolerant of Muslims because the Muslims are intolerant of me. And regarding Merkel, her policies have been a disaster. She has caused the disintegration of the European Union, as a result of her authoritarian policies.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
.....
Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.


You're defending a piece of complex legislation written by bankers for bankers, and asserting it's for the benefit of the little man.

I don't buy that.  Not one bit.

Neither have you offered a shred of evidence that your assertions have backing.

Neither does the article you quote support your personal faith in Dodd Frank.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 3191
Leave no FUD unchallenged
Merkel has destroyed her country and maybe all of Europe - what is she?
The Nazi reference suits Angela Merkel much better than anyone else. She single-handedly destroyed the European civilization by importing all these hordes of Muslims from the middle east.

If you can, imagine for just a second that you weren't both so spectacularly and obsessively intolerant of Muslims and actually had thoughts and feelings about other matters of governance.  I know it's a bit of a stretch, but just try to imagine it.  Now name one other aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.  Nothing even remotely related to people from outside countries or migration in general.  I'd certainly argue that some of the economic policies need some revision, still a bit too neoliberal for my tastes, but aside from that I don't really have many issues with her.

I find it telling that people who are intolerant of foreign people think that Trump is some kind of saviour and Merkel is the new Hitler, when people who have no issues at all with migration are actually pretty indifferent towards Merkel and see Trump as the fascist, authoritarian tyrant.  Even Robert Mugabe is a fan of Trump.  Peas in a pod.

Also, Tiny Trump meme wins the internet this week.   Grin


Oh, and I'm still waiting for someone to explain why annihilating Dodd-Frank isn't justification to call Trump the biggest clown of them all.  Pretty sure it is:

More batshit mental executive orders.  Trump opens the floodgates for the next financial crisis and round of bank bailouts because, like most politicians, he only cares about the banks and his other rich friends.  If the countless idiots who voted for him get thrown under the bus and ripped off again, he isn't going to care in the slightest.  As long as the money flows to the top of the pyramid, all is well in Mr Trump's world (Hint: you aren't a part of his world, you're just collateral damage waiting to happen).
Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Drumpf will have the law changed so he can stay in power like Adolph Hitler.

Trump is already 70 years old, and I don't think that he is greedy for power. I am not even sure whether he will run again in 2020. He will be able to do a lot in the next four years. And after that, it is up to the American people to review his rule.

Should be interesting.
Odd that people pulling out the Hitler Stalin Mao false analogies.

Merkel has destroyed her country and maybe all of Europe - what is she?

The Nazi reference suits Angela Merkel much better than anyone else. She single-handedly destroyed the European civilization by importing all these hordes of Muslims from the middle east.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
Drumpf will have the law changed so he can stay in power like Adolph Hitler.

Trump is already 70 years old, and I don't think that he is greedy for power. I am not even sure whether he will run again in 2020. He will be able to do a lot in the next four years. And after that, it is up to the American people to review his rule.

Should be interesting.
Odd that people pulling out the Hitler Stalin Mao false analogies.

Merkel has destroyed her country and maybe all of Europe - what is she?
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 500
i wanna know your thoughts ^^
He wanted to be fame hahahaha and i think he wants to troll the world with his own instinct trump are too old to handle big problems in their country he wanted to divide people on his land , abusing his power
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Drumpf will have the law changed so he can stay in power like Adolph Hitler.

Trump is already 70 years old, and I don't think that he is greedy for power. I am not even sure whether he will run again in 2020. He will be able to do a lot in the next four years. And after that, it is up to the American people to review his rule.


sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
So far so good. I like his policies and hope he does well.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
I think Early Culyer will get elected again..
and Drumpf will have the law changed so he can stay in power like Adolph Hitler.



USE THE CREAM !
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
When Barack Obama wanted to remove the sanctions against Iran are only the news of this provoked the fall of prices on the market, besides, Iran is not going to cut oil production by OPEC's decision. Iran is not beneficial to Russia

Iran is one of the top importers of Russian defense equipment (partly because they can't get the western stuff). The bilateral trade between Russia and Iran is huge and they have shared interests in Yemen and Syria. So you can't say that Iran is not beneficial to Russia.
Iran is beneficial for Russia only as a buyer of Russian weapons obsolete. As long as Iran is under sanctions he could not buy Western weapons and can not trade oil. All this suggests that when Trump decides to extend sanctions against Iran, he acts in the interests of Russia.

Trump wants to punish Iran (for obvious reasons). He is not much bothered about Russia. And Iran is not the top-most importer of the Russian equipment. India comes first, if I am not wrong.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 250
When Barack Obama wanted to remove the sanctions against Iran are only the news of this provoked the fall of prices on the market, besides, Iran is not going to cut oil production by OPEC's decision. Iran is not beneficial to Russia

Iran is one of the top importers of Russian defense equipment (partly because they can't get the western stuff). The bilateral trade between Russia and Iran is huge and they have shared interests in Yemen and Syria. So you can't say that Iran is not beneficial to Russia.
Iran is beneficial for Russia only as a buyer of Russian weapons obsolete. As long as Iran is under sanctions he could not buy Western weapons and can not trade oil. All this suggests that when Trump decides to extend sanctions against Iran, he acts in the interests of Russia.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
When Barack Obama wanted to remove the sanctions against Iran are only the news of this provoked the fall of prices on the market, besides, Iran is not going to cut oil production by OPEC's decision. Iran is not beneficial to Russia

Iran is one of the top importers of Russian defense equipment (partly because they can't get the western stuff). The bilateral trade between Russia and Iran is huge and they have shared interests in Yemen and Syria. So you can't say that Iran is not beneficial to Russia.
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Before the election many people viewed Donald Trump as the lesser of two evils since Hillary Clinton is seen as the same old corrupt politician. Now we see that his lack of experience combined with the incompetence of the people surrounding him (eg Sean Spicer), make the future unpredictably bad. I just hope he will be impeached
Are you sure that Trump the lesser evil? I'm not so sure. Can you imagine what will happen if it turns out that Trump really recruited by Putin? Look how many scandals related to the Russian trace in his team.

Sure, and Obama was recruited by Iran.

Much more likely, actually.
And what have Obama to Iran? It seems to me that Obama has done anything to Iran curtailed its nuclear program. And mind you did this without war. Trump restores sanctions against Iran to take out the competition for the Russian market.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
Before the election many people viewed Donald Trump as the lesser of two evils since Hillary Clinton is seen as the same old corrupt politician. Now we see that his lack of experience combined with the incompetence of the people surrounding him (eg Sean Spicer), make the future unpredictably bad. I just hope he will be impeached
Are you sure that Trump the lesser evil? I'm not so sure. Can you imagine what will happen if it turns out that Trump really recruited by Putin? Look how many scandals related to the Russian trace in his team.

Sure, and Obama was recruited by Iran.

Much more likely, actually.
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
Before the election many people viewed Donald Trump as the lesser of two evils since Hillary Clinton is seen as the same old corrupt politician. Now we see that his lack of experience combined with the incompetence of the people surrounding him (eg Sean Spicer), make the future unpredictably bad. I just hope he will be impeached
Are you sure that Trump the lesser evil? I'm not so sure. Can you imagine what will happen if it turns out that Trump really recruited by Putin? Look how many scandals related to the Russian trace in his team.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 265
Before the election many people viewed Donald Trump as the lesser of two evils since Hillary Clinton is seen as the same old corrupt politician. Now we see that his lack of experience combined with the incompetence of the people surrounding him (eg Sean Spicer), make the future unpredictably bad. I just hope he will be impeached
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 250
Trump never not get along with Putin. America is the Bastion of democracy, and Russia's reserve of communism. Putin is no different from Hitler. If Trump tries to get closer to Putin will be impeached.

Trump has said that he respects Putin. But he does disagree with Putin on may points. Iran is a prime example. Trump want to impose embargoes and sanctions on Iran, while Putin is opposed to the idea.
It's actually a game. Putin is not beneficial to the lifting of sanctions against Iran. There's a lot of oil and this immediately leads to the decline in world oil prices and a decline in sales to Russia. It is likely that actions Trump in favor of Russia.

In the long-term, the Iranian oil production doesn't matter much. If the price of the crude oil remains constantly above the $55 per barrel mark, then the American frackers will start ramping up their daily production. So there is no long term benefit for Russia. In addition to that, Russia knows that Trump is not very reliable. He can crack under pressure from the GOP senators.
When Barack Obama wanted to remove the sanctions against Iran are only the news of this provoked the fall of prices on the market, besides, Iran is not going to cut oil production by OPEC's decision. Iran is not beneficial to Russia
Pages:
Jump to: