Topic: What do you want to see in casino reviews? (Read 3816 times)

Whoa, that's a long time you've been gambling but I am about 20 years now, regardless, you seem to have misread me. You misread me in the sense that the negative feedback you read from either random reviewers or the influencers just saying what their paymaster would like on their webpage or social media handle can be doctored. You see, I've read a lot of sh*t about some companies that are not particularly true of them, the same thing goes for other companies that I've read good things about which later appeared to be false. This was why I was trying to tell you that reviews/feedback can't be entirely trusted, some people were paid to do that. And they could be so cunning at times to the point that they will cleverly do it by adding the negative parts to it in just a slight way.

What if the negative part is what you read and because it is not much you now went ahead to sign up with the casino believing you've read enough from that reviewing site? Now, may be the site praised the casinos 90% and disfavour them with 10% negative review, but on getting there, you now discover that the casino is worth far less and the praise is actually 40% and the dissatisfaction 60%, what do you do? My point is that for a reveinwg site to add the negative part in their review doesn't means that they are still sincere with it. They are only trying to appear genuine. I hope you get me now.

Well, but the casinos that do not take the word of the people are doing very badly , if the things they do are to improve and if they do not listen to their community, then it would be a very bad decision, in fact the casinos that fail the most and because they do not have a community, they do not have clients or people to support them, sometimes the community is a very big factor for them to be able to do things well, casinos that do not give importance to their clients normally fail very quickly, but this one type of thing is what we should see, we just have to look at the example of successful casinos, like stake.com, bitcasino.io, they are examples of casinos that Would never do something like that and will always look for the best solution to any problem.

This is hilarious and should I say I did not expect it because anyone who thinks he or she can base their casino's preference on bonuses and perks will certainly find him or herself in a hot soup in most cases. If that is the basis, then most of the new and worse casinos will win the gambler easily, and to what end? To the end that you deposit your money, and dedicate your time, energy and money to wager, but in the end, they refuse to honour your withdrawal request. So what is the gain of such a gambler? What the casino is offering me as extras like bonuses and their promotions are the least of my concerns, I do not even go for any bonus in my sports betting account, and I make sure that I segregate the account used for betting on sports from that of casino for proper management and accountability.

This is because of the ugly experiences I've had regarding the bonuses, it is just a means to tie your hand in most cases, the terms and conditions are overbearing and too demanding to me. Since I mean real business in my sports betting unlike my casino betting, I better ignore it so that I have a full say on my money. Also, the best things to look for in casinos, in my opinion, are the UI & UX, which could entail all the services of the casino, including their support and security. Other things are secondary, which could even be to lure the customers into their company.

even how many concern we will drop in each casino team but they will not comply so what would be the throw to us gamblers? we have the rights to request everything from them but they also have the rights to deny specially if they think this will not favor them by all means.
casino are here for business meaning they are only to gain and not to follow each request we asked them.

Did I say that I'm relying on that? Nope, I said that I prefer to read the negative feedback first, again it is because I take it as a warning. For me it is a better to be warned first with the negative feedback than to be assured first to play in the casino with the positive feedback. I'm confident enough with my own experience in this gambling industry as I've been here more than 10 years and I know how to deal with casino reviews out there. Even lets say we have a trusted review site, I wont trust them 100% because I have my own way to see and choose which casino is good for me. Can I be wrong? Sure, I can be wrong with it but at least I wont choose wrong casino because of review sites.

This is what we do have in mind on which in general we would really be having that kind of hesitance or kind of approach that we cant just that easily trust up when it comes to those things that we do able to read up around on which you would really be having that kind of assumption that it might be true or something fake which its normal that you would really be needing up to make out some comparison
on which its a normal approach because we cant really be able to trust up any information that we do able to read up online on which it is really just that normal act to be done.

Reviews should really be that precise and honest as much as possible and this is why whenever we do able to read up any information in the internet then it would really be always
best that you would really be needing up to verify so that you wont really be finding yourself on getting fooled due to various fake information.

I hope that many will see this needs for casino bonus as something gamblers will always like to have, now when they perform a task as required for participation in any bonus, they will like the system that regulate such, and also to  perform up to their expectations concerning the most rewarding platform, their user experience is what matters in other for them to be able to make the best use of the offers given when the security and the rewarding bonus offers are into place for them to enjoy.

I agree with you and also don't trust the various reviewers outside of our area. There are many users on the forum who are well versed in gambling and have respect and authority; they help other users in many ways and are not afraid to express their opinions. Even if they wear a signature, they will still not be afraid to write what they want to write, this also applies to me. If I don’t like certain aspects of that gambling office, I’ll immediately write this and stop wearing it. This behavior increases the level of the forum and the trust of bookmakers in it. If they are weak, then they simply will not come here, and if they are all screwed, they will want to declare it here. I am glad as an ordinary player that there is a large selection among them and I can choose the best one. In any case, I only place bets on those that are advertised only on our forum and nowhere else. This is my principled position.

Very well said bud, online reviews that are outside of forums can't be trusted, and I say this with all sincerity, what I mean by this is that, using bitcointalk forum as an example, users are here and I believe we all trust ourselves as long as a user's account clean from any negative trust, there are different platforms providing different services here, and users on this forum use those services and discuss about it here on the forum, which we could also liken to reviews, when users talk good about a service they have used on this forum, that's a review, and we can trust such service because a user of this forum whom we trust talked good about that service.

But for reviews that are outside of this forum, we don't know who wrote the review, there is no way to tell if it's a fake review or fake, there is no way to tell if the good reviews are bought with money, there is no way to tell if the rating of the platform on that service is manipulated.

So, this is why I personally do not trust reviews that are outside of this forum, and also one of the reasons why I usually don't play on casinos that are outside of this forum, except is a local casino that is very popular/well known in my country.

Indeed, the influx of biased reviews, often swayed by promotional benefits, poses a real challenge for genuine gamblers trying to make informed decisions. The points made earlier about the prevalence of inexperienced reviewers falling into the trap of biased reporting due to incentives is very concerning. These biased reviews dilute the quality and reliability of information, making it hard to distinguish between genuine user feedback and sponsored content.

To mitigate this, I believe that a more structured approach in casino reviews could be beneficial. For instance, implementing a standardized review template that requires specific details could help. This template could include criteria such as transparency of terms and conditions, withdrawal times, customer service responsiveness, and game fairness.

Furthermore, promoting a community-driven validation system where users can rate the helpfulness of a review could also enhance credibility. Users who consistently provide valuable and honest feedback could be rewarded, encouraging a culture of integrity and transparency.

Lastly, it's important for all of us in the community to share our real experiences, both positive and negative, to provide a balanced perspective. This helps in creating a more informed and less biased environment for all users. Let's strive for reviews that not only highlight the good but also expose the bad and the ugly, ensuring they are based on genuine user experiences and not influenced by external incentives.

It's probably true that the 10/90 ratio you mentioned takes place in the information dissemination system.  Taking into account, of course, how we can all get to reliable information.  But in today’s realities, I would probably change this ratio a little to about 20/80 or 25/75 (negative/positive ratio).  Still, humanity is slowly getting used to the fact that disinformation flows into our heads in a rapid stream from the Internet.  And accordingly, gradually our brain began to adapt and better filter fake and unreliable information. 

All this fully applies to information from review sites or articles about gambling and specific casinos.

Bro, you could be wrong if you are relying on that. Those influencers are so crafty these days, that they will plan it in such a way that will make the pros to be about 90% or more, and the cons to be about 10% or less. This is often common and done for people not to entirely suspect them and doesn't mean that they actually reflect the truth. Just believe in yourself these days and what you can actually verify. You can testify to this based on what is happening with the search engines these days. When you search for the Best, do not ever think you will actually see the best service popping out, it could probably be the Worst service that would pop out on the first list.

Do you now think they will not carefully write something to cajole you that it is actually the best even as they also write some cons to make you not suspect them? This is why we should be very careful.

I think we all have a vision of what is possible or not to do , if we see these Reviews on casinos , we have to identify at Once what is good and bad about a Casino, but based on the fact that things are Basically very good at When it comes to making a rating we see that there are many Reviewers who are new because basically they are very biased because there are some casinos that pay to have good advertising for them, what happens is that they Know each other because they are Novice users , and those are the ones who Basically They lend Themselves to this type of Advertising, now, those of us who know, and have in the forum, well, some Negative Things they say, at least I pay Attention to them. them, but it's not that it's negative, it's that they are points that one needs to know What's the point of a Review deceiving us? then we Spend money, then it is better that things are done Well as they are.

You're right that the review must highlight all aspects of the casino, not just the benefits.

We at Doublethebitcoin focus on the credibility and features of the casinos.
Given we are in the crypto world, there is a higher risk of problems, IMO. On the other hand, you get exclusive games, anonymity, and unique promotions.

If you read my first post, I've clearly said about "reputable reviewers/review sites" which logically means that the review both negative and positive are mostly legit. Even if I read the negative review on an unknown review site, it is a warning for me which will make me curious and try to find other reviews as comparison.

I hope they don't have an option to delete reviews they don't like. Otherwise, they can leave only what they need from real reviews and supplement them with custom ones; if this is the case, then I would not read the reviews at all. It is probably worth paying attention to specialized forums that have existed for a long time and have a good reputation. But we must always remember that where there is big money, there will be those who want to deceive or manipulate. You must always remember this to avoid problems.

Yes, negative reviews help point out a site's weak points.  Because of this I also agree with you that negative reviews are more of a boon to a site than positive reviews. Here the sites which come to do a real business in the market always try to find out their weak points. And because of this they don't pay any review site to get good reviews for their site.  Those who intend to scam get excited when they see negative reviews

But not all negative would really be legit, just like on what mentioned above that you would really be needing to make out some verification or would be indepth research before you would be that
believing with those negative reviews because it could really be that false or just been that intentionally be that showing those bad reviews or feedbacks. So it would really be best
that you should be looking for it neither its legit or something not because if you do find out that there are tons of good feedbacks than with those negative ones then it simply shows that it did
really outweighs and something that you would really be considering on treating it up to be a better site rather than to be bad. It would really be on your choice on how you would gonna approach it.

Well I also think the same, for reviewers it can be one of the things that slows down their analysis, but in this case things can be very different, for example we as players who only go to the casino to try and see what we like . and what we don't like, if we find the game good or bad, as we feel, we all have different points of view, and we believe that the reviews may not be, but for example when we focus on certain criteria that we look for, many reviewers are very focused on the same criteria, because they almost comply with a pattern and that is what I don't like, because there is no one who goes further, those who go further are ourselves as players, there is a certain discrepancy in that, but Money is the main driver needed for a very complete overhaul.

The good things are usually about similar things but the bad things are usually different especially if the reviewer took a real experience while reviewing the casino. Why bad things is important to read, because it is warning for me for the worst case. The same when I want to buy specific product, I'll try to find the cons of the product first  because if I look at the pros only, I'll have too much expectation.