Well, it is not just about the identity of Satoshi as such
Let's not forget that he presumably has around 1M bitcoins, which is worth almost 8B dollars at present prices. If you take into account this little fact, things start to look somewhat different (mildly speaking), and finding out who is hiding behind the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto suddenly stops being a matter of pure curiosity or idle interest. In other words, this individual has good reasons to keep his incognito (while others to break it)
Let's not forget that he presumably has around 1M bitcoins, which is worth almost 8B dollars at present prices. If you take into account this little fact, things start to look somewhat different (mildly speaking), and finding out who is hiding behind the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto suddenly stops being a matter of pure curiosity or idle interest. In other words, this individual has good reasons to keep his incognito (while others to break it)
If he hasn't moved them by now, why would he ever move them? He clearly doesn't need them for financial reasons, and he hinted with his statements about lost coins that they might be a "donation" to Bitcoin holders. If Satoshi were planning to spend these coins, it would have made sense to move some of them early on to prevent all this folklore about "the Satoshi coins." I think under most scenarios, those coins are long lost.
The bigger question for me is when quantum computing might allow some entity to steal them. Since so many of these early bitcoins are held on exposed pubkeys (instead of pubkey hashes), this is a distinct possibility.
