Cleopatra wasn't white.
greeks are white in case you didn't know 
Topic: What is white nationalism and why it is so dangerous? - page 5. (Read 6668 times)
^
No only read the stuff i post everyone else is boring
No only read the stuff i post everyone else is boring
He was correct at the time he wrote that. The majority of Africans were just savages, no signs of civilization ever found among them. That explain how the Egyptians where able to survive for 3000 years
Boy, are you going to be in for a big surprise when you find out what continent Egypt is in.
Just in case you do not know: Egyptian civilization was a small part of the African continent and they were not even "black". In other words, the African people where ruled and slaved by another race while living in Egypt.
What race you think was Cleopatra, the last pharaoh?
African is not synonymous with black. Just stop talking on this topic, please, save yourself from the embarrassment. Just so you guys know, I've dealt with the exact same arguments for over 7 years
You did not answer my question: what race you think was Cleopatra?
When I said African were savages, I meant racially Africans, the races of African people. They never developed any civilization. You then implied they developed Egyptian civilization. So, who developed Egyptian civilization and how that proves that Africans are not most savages at the time Darwin wrote his book?
At the time Darwin wrote his book, Black people were being enslaved by the white people, so clearly, we can see who was the real savage of his time. By "racially African", do you mean "black people"? If so, just say it, don't be ashamed of the terminology, be ashamed of the ideology.
Egyptians developed Egyptian civilization, not some blond guy with blue eyes, sorry!
Not like some people who think it's only ever happened to them..
HISTORY LESSON..
Britain was Druidry then the Romans come along and forced us into there beliefs Christianity
While making slaves of us and paying taxes from farming our lands that they took off us..
All for the roman empire..
So we had Christianity forced upon us by Romans..
Now we have Islam forced upon us by Saudi Arabia..
Not fair this we are getting picked on us British right that's it i am setting up white lives matter
White power.. White power..You brown eyed devil bourbon...
Don't be offended black people you say this and it's ok for you..
Not fair this we are getting picked on us African American right that's it i am setting up Black lives matter..
Black power..Black power..You blue eyed devils crackers
..But i suppose because i am white it's wrong for me to say this but ok if your black?..
Say all lives matter your on to a winner..Say black lives matter you will never win..
A fact even if you don't like the outcome..
Biggest slave owners in the 21st century?..
Big businesses wanting us to work for a pittance..
While his friend who works for the government takes even more of our pittance to fund his friend
who owns some arms energy transport company and he wants even more of our pittance..
So in the end your left with no pittance..
So before you black lives matter start going around blaming white people as a whole you got a black president and still you don't get it...
NOT ABOUT COLOUR ..Always been about poor and rich ..Always been about the money..
Like in Africa a black guy would go and capture black people and sell them to the white people for slaves..
In some Europe countries the white people will capture white slave girls and sell the for sex..
The white guys even sell them abroad to other white people for sex slaves to make the white guy more money..
So before black people go on about black lives matter many many white people get treated like shit as well..
UK not so long ago black lives matter tried to complain..when well more white people die in police custody than any amount of blacks..But we don't call for white lives matter..
Most black people in the west never even seen Africa and where never slaves not now in this day and age..ALL about poverty and white people suffer too..
Even if all the politicians were black..Black people would still be poor nothing would be any different than what they are now..Maybe no fact it be worse..
Just go and look at Africa..They get all this aid to build there nation and the politicians steal it all
well not all they put a lamp post in the ground instead of a motorway..
Because they robbed all the rest and cannot afford to build nothing else..
Also, when you use the N word, are you referring to black people in particular? Every human being, regardless of skin color, can trace their roots to the African continent, white people didn't just plop from the sky, despite what followers of White Jesus would have you believe. Saying "all races practiced slavery" neither excuses white supremacy, nor does it negate the fact that white people ran the slave trade in America.
That is just a hypothesis, it has not been even proven true.
Go figure out, you are not not well versed in the subject for a serious discussion at the moment. All you are doing is find an excuse to justify the genocide of the Aryan people in their own homelands.
At the time Darwin wrote his book, Black people were being enslaved by the white people, so clearly, we can see who was the real savage of his time. By "racially African", do you mean "black people"? If so, just say it, don't be ashamed of the terminology, be ashamed of the ideology.
Egyptians developed Egyptian civilization, not some blond guy with blue eyes, sorry!
I mean Negroes.
By the time of Darwin the Africans were capturing and slaving their own people to sell to the "white supremacists". Europeans had barely done any capturing of savage tribes in the Africa continent. Moreover, If was not by the slave trade many Negroes would be still living among their primitive ancestors today. Every descendant of Africans living in an Aryan nation should be extremely grateful for what Aryans did for their welfare.
Your definition of "Aryan" is a bit off, and Hitleresque.
Also, if you are born to American parents, it doesn't make you a descendant of Africans. You seem to have everything mixed up. "Africans" did not run the slave trade, white people did. Do they teach anything in Catholic school?
It does as the genes of a Negro will always be traced back to the African continent. Thus why the usual term African Americans.
Yes, Africans did run the slave trade among themselves. This is well documented and a simple Google search will provide you the details. Slave trade has been practiced by all races, not just Aryans.
Moreover, you did not answer the question of what race was Cleopatra. So it seems you are not well versed in such subject. So I will not insist on it.
I will finally say that whatever is your excuse to label Aryans as "white supremacists", none justify the planned mass immigration into Aryan nations. It is genocide and you are just looking for a pretext to justify it.
Cleopatra wasn't white.
Also, when you use the N word, are you referring to black people in particular? Every human being, regardless of skin color, can trace their roots to the African continent, white people didn't just plop from the sky, despite what followers of White Jesus would have you believe. Saying "all races practiced slavery" neither excuses white supremacy, nor does it negate the fact that white people ran the slave trade in America.
At the time Darwin wrote his book, Black people were being enslaved by the white people, so clearly, we can see who was the real savage of his time. By "racially African", do you mean "black people"? If so, just say it, don't be ashamed of the terminology, be ashamed of the ideology.
Egyptians developed Egyptian civilization, not some blond guy with blue eyes, sorry!
I mean Negroes.
By the time of Darwin the Africans were capturing and slaving their own people to sell to the "white supremacists". Europeans had barely done any capturing of savage tribes in the Africa continent. Moreover, If was not by the slave trade many Negroes would be still living among their primitive ancestors today. Every descendant of Africans living in an Aryan nation should be extremely grateful for what Aryans did for their welfare.
Your definition of "Aryan" is a bit off, and Hitleresque.
Also, if you are born to American parents, it doesn't make you a descendant of Africans. You seem to have everything mixed up. "Africans" did not run the slave trade, white people did. Do they teach anything in Catholic school?
It does as the genes of a Negro will always be traced back to the African continent. Thus why the usual term African Americans.
Yes, Africans did run the slave trade among themselves. This is well documented and a simple Google search will provide you the details. Slave trade has been practiced by all races, not just Aryans.
Moreover, you did not answer the question of what race was Cleopatra. So it seems you are not well versed in such subject. So I will not insist on it.
I will finally say that whatever is your excuse to label Aryans as "white supremacists", none justify the planned mass immigration into Aryan nations. It is genocide and you are just looking for a pretext to justify it.
At the time Darwin wrote his book, Black people were being enslaved by the white people, so clearly, we can see who was the real savage of his time. By "racially African", do you mean "black people"? If so, just say it, don't be ashamed of the terminology, be ashamed of the ideology.
Egyptians developed Egyptian civilization, not some blond guy with blue eyes, sorry!
I mean Negroes.
By the time of Darwin the Africans were capturing and slaving their own people to sell to the "white supremacists". Europeans had barely done any capturing of savage tribes in the Africa continent. Moreover, If was not by the slave trade many Negroes would be still living among their primitive ancestors today. Every descendant of Africans living in an Aryan nation should be extremely grateful for what Aryans did for their welfare.
Your definition of "Aryan" is a bit off, and Hitleresque.
Also, if you are born to American parents, it doesn't make you a descendant of Africans. You seem to have everything mixed up. "Africans" did not run the slave trade, white people did. Do they teach anything in Catholic school?
At the time Darwin wrote his book, Black people were being enslaved by the white people, so clearly, we can see who was the real savage of his time. By "racially African", do you mean "black people"? If so, just say it, don't be ashamed of the terminology, be ashamed of the ideology.
Egyptians developed Egyptian civilization, not some blond guy with blue eyes, sorry!
I mean Negroes.
By the time of Darwin the Africans were capturing and slaving their own people to sell to the "white supremacists". Europeans had barely done any capturing of savage tribes in the Africa continent. Moreover, If was not by the slave trade many Negroes would be still living among their primitive ancestors today. Every descendant of Africans living in an Aryan nation should be extremely grateful for what Aryans did for their welfare.
EDIT: Anyway, what race you think was Cleopatra? You still did not answer. Negro she was not. So what she was?
He was correct at the time he wrote that. The majority of Africans were just savages, no signs of civilization ever found among them. That explain how the Egyptians where able to survive for 3000 years
Boy, are you going to be in for a big surprise when you find out what continent Egypt is in.
Just in case you do not know: Egyptian civilization was a small part of the African continent and they were not even "black". In other words, the African people where ruled and slaved by another race while living in Egypt.
What race you think was Cleopatra, the last pharaoh?
African is not synonymous with black. Just stop talking on this topic, please, save yourself from the embarrassment. Just so you guys know, I've dealt with the exact same arguments for over 7 years
You did not answer my question: what race you think was Cleopatra?
When I said African were savages, I meant racially Africans, the races of African people. They never developed any civilization. You then implied they developed Egyptian civilization. So, who developed Egyptian civilization and how that proves that Africans are not most savages at the time Darwin wrote his book?
At the time Darwin wrote his book, Black people were being enslaved by the white people, so clearly, we can see who was the real savage of his time. By "racially African", do you mean "black people"? If so, just say it, don't be ashamed of the terminology, be ashamed of the ideology.
Egyptians developed Egyptian civilization, not some blond guy with blue eyes, sorry!
He was correct at the time he wrote that. The majority of Africans were just savages, no signs of civilization ever found among them. That explain how the Egyptians where able to survive for 3000 years
Boy, are you going to be in for a big surprise when you find out what continent Egypt is in.
Just in case you do not know: Egyptian civilization was a small part of the African continent and they were not even "black". In other words, the African people where ruled and slaved by another race while living in Egypt.
What race you think was Cleopatra, the last pharaoh?
African is not synonymous with black. Just stop talking on this topic, please, save yourself from the embarrassment. Just so you guys know, I've dealt with the exact same arguments for over 7 years
You did not answer my question: what race you think was Cleopatra?
When I said African were savages, I meant racially Africans, the races of African people. They never developed any civilization. You then implied they developed Egyptian civilization. So, who developed Egyptian civilization and how that proves that Africans are not most savages at the time Darwin wrote his book?
He was correct at the time he wrote that. The majority of Africans were just savages, no signs of civilization ever found among them. That explain how the Egyptians where able to survive for 3000 years
Boy, are you going to be in for a big surprise when you find out what continent Egypt is in.
Just in case you do not know: Egyptian civilization was a small part of the African continent and they were not even "black". In other words, the African people where ruled and slaved by another race while living in Egypt.
What race you think was Cleopatra, the last pharaoh?
African is not synonymous with black. Just stop talking on this topic, please, save yourself from the embarrassment. Just so you guys know, I've dealt with the exact same arguments for over 7 years
He was correct at the time he wrote that. The majority of Africans were just savages, no signs of civilization ever found among them. That explain how the Egyptians where able to survive for 3000 years
Boy, are you going to be in for a big surprise when you find out what continent Egypt is in.
Just in case you do not know: Egyptian civilization was a small part of the African continent and they were not even "black". In other words, the African people where ruled and slaved by another race while living in Egypt.
What race you think was Cleopatra, the last pharaoh?
The funny part about this discussion, is that if was not Darwin amazing insight in the natural world, we would not have the advanced medicine we have today. Darwin theory open the world for a new perspective: experiment in mammals could be done to replicate experiments in man since there was a genetic relationship between both. Thus a new field of scientific biology came to exist, making possible to develop medicine to save lives of unnecessary suffering.
Yet there are people still bashing Aryans like Darwin and others of being "supremacists"...
Yet there are people still bashing Aryans like Darwin and others of being "supremacists"...
He was correct at the time he wrote that. The majority of Africans were just savages, no signs of civilization ever found among them. That explain how the Egyptians where able to survive for 3000 years
Boy, are you going to be in for a big surprise when you find out what continent Egypt is in.
He referred to black people as the "savage" or "inferior" races. He knew he was wrong, because people were into egalitarianism even in his days. It was only white supremacists who could not accept that all races are equal, he believed he had some magical powers for being white. Does that sound familiar? Because it certainly does to me.
And, he was wrong. PoCs are still here, and they're here to stay, whether you like it or not =]
He was correct at the time he wrote that. The majority of Africans were just savages, no signs of civilization ever found among them. That explain how the Egyptians where able to survive for 3000 years: endless supply of salves captured from the savages tribes of Africa. Yet, even after Egypt civilization, the Africans were not able to do anything more than build huts. So Darwin was historical correct, the Africans at that time were savages. It was Aryans which provided every technology the Africans use today. They are inferior when the comparison is technological progress and human intelligence.
The article describes Aryans ranging from Europe over India to Nepal though.
Well, that is the problem with open source encyclopedias.
Aryan people once lived in such places thousands of years ago. But they were breed out and today just mongrel races live there. The problem here is the lack of racial awareness of who produced that definition. Aryans are just really "white people", from the sun tanned Mediterranean to the milk skin Nordic, from the strong eastern European to the Auburn haired Irish and Icelander.
What? Have you even studied natural selection? Darwin? There are so many things wrong with your statement....
There are even more things wrong with Darwin's statements:
I have studied natural selection, I stay away from Darwin.
Let's put this in a wider context:
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZvsHAAAAIAAJ&dq=the+descent+of+man&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Darwin meant "exterminate" by the process of Natural Selection.
What is wrong with that? That statement fits perfectly Darwin's hypothesis.
He referred to black people as the "savage" or "inferior" races. He knew he was wrong, because people were into egalitarianism even in his days. It was only white supremacists who could not accept that all races are equal, he believed he had some magical powers for being white. Does that sound familiar? Because it certainly does to me.
And, he was wrong. PoCs are still here, and they're here to stay, whether you like it or not =]
What? Have you even studied natural selection? Darwin? There are so many things wrong with your statement....
There are even more things wrong with Darwin's statements:
I have studied natural selection, I stay away from Darwin.
Let's put this in a wider context:
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZvsHAAAAIAAJ&dq=the+descent+of+man&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Darwin meant "exterminate" by the process of Natural Selection.
What is wrong with that? That statement fits perfectly Darwin's hypothesis.
Can you people please post a scientific source for the definition of Aryan? 
Ignoring the truth doesn't change it.
Ignoring the truth doesn't change it.
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=96sQAAAAIAAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s
The Aryan Origin of the Gaelic Race and Language
Ulick Joseph Bourke
In another words, Aryans are the descendants of people which lived in the European continent, British Islands, Iceland and west Russia before 20th century.
Im not a anthropologist so before I start to read that book from 1875 can you comment shortly if this wiki article is correct: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race ?
Yes, I agree with that definition. Just ignore the yet another "Nazi" and "master race" slur. It was National Socialism and yes, it recognized the Aryan race to define the policies of the state. But it was not intended to slave other races, it was only intended to assert that Europe was the homeland of the Aryan people.
The article describes Aryans ranging from Europe over India to Nepal though.
Can you people please post a scientific source for the definition of Aryan?
Ignoring the truth doesn't change it.
Ignoring the truth doesn't change it.
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=96sQAAAAIAAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s
The Aryan Origin of the Gaelic Race and Language
Ulick Joseph Bourke
In another words, Aryans are the descendants of people which lived in the European continent, British Islands, Iceland and west Russia before 20th century.
Im not a anthropologist so before I start to read that book from 1875 can you comment shortly if this wiki article is correct: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race ?
Yes, I agree with that definition. Just ignore the yet another "Nazi" and "master race" slur. It was National Socialism and yes, it recognized the Aryan race to define the policies of the state. But it was not intended to slave other races, it was only intended to assert that Europe was the homeland of the Aryan people.
Jump to: