Pages:
Author

Topic: What is your average kH/s? - page 2. (Read 2336 times)

full member
Activity: 155
Merit: 102
December 29, 2013, 08:11:35 PM
#28
740 each r280x X 4 in one rig.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 07:42:14 PM
#27
I'm currently getting 1300 kH/s running 2x R9 270x cards.
full member
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
December 29, 2013, 07:34:13 PM
#26
Are we talking scrypt here?
If so;


Deskstop:
   GPU- HD 6850: 235kh/s
   CPU- i7 920: 27kh/s

Laptop:
   CPU- i7 3610QM: 36kh/s


also; https://litecoin.info/Mining_hardware_comparison is a good resource for finding what speeds you can get and the best setting for your miner.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 06:19:26 PM
#25
6 x Asus 280x Direct CU2 TOP @ 743-745kh/s each = 4.5Mh/s

Undervolted 1100 or 1068 in trix and running 1060/1500 - i13 - tc8192 -w256

ASUS Sabertooth 990FX Motherboards

Running with open air frames @72c in summer.

These Asus R9 280X CU2s do pretty much 745kh/s out of the box and are voltage unlocked.

I turned GPU clock down from default of 1070 to 1060 and undervolted to get power usage and heat down.
That way the GPU fans are only running at 1500-2000 rpm so not so noisy and keeps the watts through PSU down as well.

full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
December 29, 2013, 06:00:20 PM
#24
At the moment I have 2 x 2.5 GH/s.
I'm looking to buy something better soon, the ASIC cube looks to have some good reviews.
What do you guys think? Is the cube the best option available? and how long until something even better gets out?

This looks like Bitcoin mining. Any link to the cube ?  I hear it first time Smiley
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 05:54:25 PM
#23
At the moment I have 2 x 2.5 GH/s.
I'm looking to buy something better soon, the ASIC cube looks to have some good reviews.
What do you guys think? Is the cube the best option available? and how long until something even better gets out?
full member
Activity: 212
Merit: 100
December 29, 2013, 05:46:39 PM
#22
Mining at 1300 Kh/s with an undervolted 7990 Smiley. I'm down below the equator so its dam hot!
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
December 29, 2013, 05:37:43 PM
#21
Running 4x 280x at 740Kh/s
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 05:28:11 PM
#20
around 9000Kh/s with 5850x3,5870x8, 5970x4 7870x2 and R9 270X x2
assembled on 2x ASROCK 970 extreme4 and one ASROCK 990 FX extreme4 plus a few old motherboards only accepting 2 graphic cards
Powered by 3x Antec TPQ1200, one Antec TPQ 850, one Antec HCG850 and one  Antec HCG900

Waiting for one 970 extreme4 to put on 3x 5850 that are waiting to hash

BTW, it's hot in my room, even with the window half open in winter.


Well you dont need a heater in the winter!! Tongue
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 05:24:50 PM
#19
A whopping 580khash with 2x gtx 670's.  Even with the improvement with cudaminer, it's not enough to be profitable mining anything unless it's a new coin on day one. Cry
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 05:08:31 PM
#18
750KH/s @ Asus 280x Direct CU2 TOP
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
December 29, 2013, 04:35:41 PM
#17
around 9000Kh/s with 5850x3,5870x8, 5970x4 7870x2 and R9 270X x2
assembled on 2x ASROCK 970 extreme4 and one ASROCK 990 FX extreme4 plus a few old motherboards only accepting 2 graphic cards
Powered by 3x Antec TPQ1200, one Antec TPQ 850, one Antec HCG850 and one  Antec HCG900

Waiting for one 970 extreme4 to put on 3x 5850 that are waiting to hash

BTW, it's hot in my room, even with the window half open in winter.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 04:19:43 PM
#16
800 kh/s, very annoying compare to other miners here
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 04:18:09 PM
#15
Mining at 630kh/s with the only gigabyte 7950 left.
Already sold all my miners a few months ago, not sure that was the right choice
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 04:16:19 PM
#14
mine are
7970: 625kh/s 900mhz core 1375mhz mem 70c temp
--intensity 13 --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 --lookup-gap 2 --vectors 1 --temp-cutoff 80
6950: 330kh/s 870mhz core 1250mhz mem 60c temp
--intensity 13 --shaders 1408 --thread-concurrency 6144 -g 1 --lookup-gap 2 --vectors 1 --temp-cutoff 80
Fx-4100: about 500kh/s on quark, 4.4Ghz core clock 40c temp

System spec:
CPU fx-4100, 4.4GHz x22 multi 40c full load (Corsair H40 CPU cooler)
Mobo: Asus m5a97 Evo 38c temp
Bus speed: 200mhz
FSB 2200mhz
NB: 2400mhz
Mem: 16gb 1600mhz 11-11-11-32
Primary hard drive: 128GB PCI-E SSD Raid 0
PSU: Corsair GS700 (700watt)
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 03:36:24 PM
#13
Mining with a 7950, I can't make it go over 500Kh/s :-(
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
December 29, 2013, 03:17:06 PM
#12
3960 KH/s
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
December 29, 2013, 03:16:00 PM
#11
about 8600 kh/s with a R9 290. i highly recommned this card!

overclocked much Huh
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 03:15:11 PM
#10
 about 8600 kh/s with a R9 290. i highly recommned this card!
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
December 29, 2013, 03:05:03 PM
#9
So I recently bought a new Gigabite Radeon R9 270 for around $230. With proper config, I reached 450 kH/s.

"setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

cgminer --scrypt -o xxx -u xxx -p xxx -I 19 -g 1 -w 512 --thread-concurrency 15232 --temp-target 63 --temp-cutoff 85 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-memdiff 0"

My question is, should I believe my cgminer or pool stats with kH/s?

Your cgminer will have a more accurate representation of what you are mining at. You would be able to obtain more kh's with intensity on 20 but you would have to change other settings to accommodate it so no HW errors occur.
Pages:
Jump to: