<…>
If I had to distribute sMerits in accordance to a pre-set criteria based on Rank or else, then I’d probably stepdown from being a Merit Source. The idea is to merit what you find interesting at your own free will and time. Most Merit Sources will award sMerits regardless of the recipient’s Rank, and even take a kinder eye to lower Ranks to a certain degree.
There are always bound to be good post that go unmerited, even for those that earn them frequently (check column %MeritedPosts
some cases here for example). What shouldn’t happen too frequently is for someone who consistently makes good post to go unmerited. If so, these are cases to bring forward.
Note 1: Rather than delimit the way how people decide to award their sMerits, I’d always vouch for, were it the case, having more Merit Sources to introduce additional diversity in criteria.
Note 2: This doesn’t mean that I find
ranking-up numbers particularly great at all. Quite the opposite for the mid-to-high ranks in fact.
Edit:<..>No wonder the last time I checked the generous user's thread you dropped deep down.
Yep ...