Have you ever wondered what the bitcointalk forum would be like without signature campaigns? I have thought long and hard about this question. There have been numerous controversies regarding post bursting and spamming just to meet the weekly post count and other vices on the forum, all in the name of joining signature campaigns. As a result, many users have faced punitive measures such as temporary or permanent bans, registration tags, and more. The reputation board, which is the court house of the forum, is brimming with disciplinary cases, most of which are related to users in signature campaigns.
Therefore, I ask, what would the forum be like without signature campaigns?
Would it be more sanitized?
Would it be less filled with spams?
Would there be fewer alternate accounts?
What only fantastic questions will not hear at a forum.
Why should I think about what the forum will be like without signature campaigns, if at the moment campaigns are an integral part of the forum. And, for quite some time now. Will these fantasies somehow affect the current situation? No. Then why fill head with all sorts of trash?
If someday signature campaigns are no longer used on the bitcointalk, that's when we can see the consequences and impact of this.
What exactly do you mean by sanitized?
How do signature campaigns affect spam? In my opinion, people can spam without it. If you mean improving the quality of posts, then it is unlikely to happen without signature campaigns.