I doubt he is satoshi though. There is something not right about him
Topic: Whats up with Craig Wright? - page 4. (Read 1491 times)
I kind of think he was trying to make people understand that satoshi wasn't a real name.. . that it was a psdonym or something.
I doubt he is satoshi though. There is something not right about him
I doubt he is satoshi though. There is something not right about him
Start a petition to boycott any and all crypto conferences where Craig Wright is schedule to speak, albeit allowing him to attend for possible shit slinging by attendees ...
Ineffectual because "crypto" conference have long been thoroughly overrun with scammers. Everyone who takes a strongly principled position on not attending events with scammer sponsors or speakers are already rejecting almost all events in this space.Scammers just get a much larger marginal return from promotional activities like conference speaking/sponsorships. Conferences are almost all run as money making enterprises, so the fact that they're saturated with scammers is unsurprising.
Would you be wiling to participate in one of the Tone Vays' conferences? Either Unconfiscatable conference or the up and coming Understanding Bitcoin ones.
Websites:
http://unconfiscatable.com/
http://understandingbtc.com/
Adam Back and Wladimir Van Der Laan are going to understanding BTC. I think they are the only 2 decent conferences out there. Understanding BTC is aimed at Bitcoin devs mostly.
The first one is over and I missed it, for I live in Vegas. #Sad!
Start a petition to boycott any and all crypto conferences where Craig Wright is schedule to speak, albeit allowing him to attend for possible shit slinging by attendees ...
Ineffectual because "crypto" conference have long been thoroughly overrun with scammers. Everyone who takes a strongly principled position on not attending events with scammer sponsors or speakers are already rejecting almost all events in this space.Scammers just get a much larger marginal return from promotional activities like conference speaking/sponsorships. Conferences are almost all run as money making enterprises, so the fact that they're saturated with scammers is unsurprising.
Would you be wiling to participate in one of the Tone Vays' conferences? Either Unconfiscatable conference or the up and coming Understanding Bitcoin ones.
Websites:
http://unconfiscatable.com/
http://understandingbtc.com/
Adam Back and Wladimir Van Der Laan are going to understanding BTC. I think they are the only 2 decent conferences out there. Understanding BTC is aimed at Bitcoin devs mostly.
Craig Wright is left only to make some filthy statements on bitcoin and crypto industry he want to divert the investor's attention into his own project bitcoinsv
Already read that in great detail.
Foul play alleged from all sides.
CSW claims to be Satoshi and yet has still not Signed any block as definitive proof.
I'm certainly not a troll, I used to communicate with Satoshi (on this very forum).
Unlike Craig, I have verified myself ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/verifying-my-old-zero-balance-wallet-address-for-blockchain-research-etc-4630066
Craig (currently) being unable or unwilling to (legitimately) Sign anything has caused 2 major problems for BSV / nchain.
1) Not signing a stated claim is a false pretence.
2) The continuing duration of this false pretence has impacted on the entire crypto space, including the market.
...
If folks actually digested my own posts you would likely discover that I have not referred to Craig as a 'Faketoshi' or otherwise.
Innocent until proven guilty. However ...
Why does Craig avoid Bitcoin 'old timers' like the plague and/or not just come back to this forum to set the record straight? According to Craig's own story he had moved on to other things ... whilst leaving the Bitcoin community to both establish, maintain and build the project in his absence (and off their own backs!).
Do you think it is OK to retain the (metaphorical) last piece of the puzzle, to place the final piece and to proclaim wholeheartedly "I built all this" and "You are all wrong!" etc.,
...
People in the world
Do not doubt
It is teaching
Which is the
beginning of doubt.
- Zen poem
...
Again, this is Financial Cryptography, so do not trust. Sign and Verify.
Simply, Put up, or Shut up.
- https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/put+up+or+shut+up
- https://youtu.be/4oPddS8HujA
Of course he's a lying impostor. And it's strange that so few impostors have come up. But out of curiosity, has he ever commented on some of the choices he, being satoshi, chose to make? It is always interesting to see a liar scrambling to explain choices that he has no idea why they were made.
Why did he choose that name? "Satoshi Nakamoto"
Why did he choose that name? "Satoshi Nakamoto"
Can't / Won't Sign and Verify a single Bitcoin block (as bitcoins supposed creator). 
Yet, I, a humble bitcoin early adopter can Sign and Verify blocks on old wallets, blocks that do not even exist (as well as ones that do of course!) ...
PM me if you need 'help' with that.
...
- https://medium.com/@hoaxchain/the-hard-evidence-about-craig-wrights-backdated-pgp-key-step-by-step-guide-for-windows-users-bd99c47c495f
Yet, I, a humble bitcoin early adopter can Sign and Verify blocks on old wallets, blocks that do not even exist (as well as ones that do of course!) ...
Early "orphan" / stale block ... (from above wallet) - Transaction ID does not exist of course.
- https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Orphan_Block
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Status: 0/unconfirmed, not in memory pool
Date: 09/04/2010 14:43
Source: Generated
Credit: (not accepted)
Net amount: 0.00000000 BTC
Transaction ID: a4781b7295cf8b9ca893f8f53128281055ce65065296028d653183047325b368
Transaction total size: 135 bytes
Transaction virtual size: 135 bytes
Output index: 0
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
13YnHMaM5N6Bu8PhNR61c8RvJzJuExR8sd
Gxk5GpFaCwS5rNMcoSxGyI33v2DsNzZkKN1qwj/G1xi0KLQ/q12uGSMikpnCQvUjnHN6XMjiVaEeB/1VkwTsf2A=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Raw transaction:
01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff080415112a1c021801ffffffff0100f2052a01000000434104f3b55f4c4404a2168f655b6445 355b2e10371358f10773fcb8c0c75257d1fdf65e42d9de2461fa979439afec1724bb3b21f4db9da f71b4b65260d0010a901e54ac00000000
...
Another "orphan" / stale block from this wallet ...
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Status: 0/unconfirmed, not in memory pool
Date: 30/08/2010 00:24
Source: Generated
Credit: (not accepted)
Net amount: 0.00000000 BTC
Transaction ID: 84ed48256490fa9c810e2fcb4d6425ddefe66f17a930e650f195d2d86456734a
Transaction total size: 134 bytes
Transaction virtual size: 134 bytes
Output index: 0
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Pcug4mrmFE2bRSfmhZmkTcMg31qcHgoAT
HB6RUA3fY+r4v6OJlpk4jog84oKkBpMdU34KvFts7xnNYYyUSgsUDvMr4BoFSKF3r69K8oQPBqx5mcoKrNsT+Pk=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Raw transaction:
01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff0704ffff001d0106ffffffff0100f2052a010000004341041b227fdd446449a74adbb9946b53 ef9c20e3cb74fc3269f7bbcf5bf11ba537e98d649dc19735d2aeda40e1587fc5652dda4ad458c79 289b643e54dfa4b4822eaac00000000
...
- https://youtu.be/CSvFpBOe8eY
- https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Orphan_Block
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Status: 0/unconfirmed, not in memory pool
Date: 09/04/2010 14:43
Source: Generated
Credit: (not accepted)
Net amount: 0.00000000 BTC
Transaction ID: a4781b7295cf8b9ca893f8f53128281055ce65065296028d653183047325b368
Transaction total size: 135 bytes
Transaction virtual size: 135 bytes
Output index: 0
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
13YnHMaM5N6Bu8PhNR61c8RvJzJuExR8sd
Gxk5GpFaCwS5rNMcoSxGyI33v2DsNzZkKN1qwj/G1xi0KLQ/q12uGSMikpnCQvUjnHN6XMjiVaEeB/1VkwTsf2A=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Raw transaction:
01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff080415112a1c021801ffffffff0100f2052a01000000434104f3b55f4c4404a2168f655b6445 355b2e10371358f10773fcb8c0c75257d1fdf65e42d9de2461fa979439afec1724bb3b21f4db9da f71b4b65260d0010a901e54ac00000000
...
Another "orphan" / stale block from this wallet ...
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Status: 0/unconfirmed, not in memory pool
Date: 30/08/2010 00:24
Source: Generated
Credit: (not accepted)
Net amount: 0.00000000 BTC
Transaction ID: 84ed48256490fa9c810e2fcb4d6425ddefe66f17a930e650f195d2d86456734a
Transaction total size: 134 bytes
Transaction virtual size: 134 bytes
Output index: 0
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Pcug4mrmFE2bRSfmhZmkTcMg31qcHgoAT
HB6RUA3fY+r4v6OJlpk4jog84oKkBpMdU34KvFts7xnNYYyUSgsUDvMr4BoFSKF3r69K8oQPBqx5mcoKrNsT+Pk=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Raw transaction:
01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff0704ffff001d0106ffffffff0100f2052a010000004341041b227fdd446449a74adbb9946b53 ef9c20e3cb74fc3269f7bbcf5bf11ba537e98d649dc19735d2aeda40e1587fc5652dda4ad458c79 289b643e54dfa4b4822eaac00000000
...
- https://youtu.be/CSvFpBOe8eY
PM me if you need 'help' with that.
...
- https://medium.com/@hoaxchain/the-hard-evidence-about-craig-wrights-backdated-pgp-key-step-by-step-guide-for-windows-users-bd99c47c495f
The Craig Wright is nobody to me because i don't want to know satoshi. I like the fact that he is a faceless man so please let us stop talking about this Craig Wright guy.
both cash and SV didnt 'take' hashrate away
both cash and SV didnt influence bitcoin
both cash and SV didnt influence bitcoin
in other words you are trying to say that it was a coincidence that exactly at the same time as these forks occurred bitcoin hashrate went down. not to mention the EDA shenanigans of BCH and the fact that each time they reduced the difficulty bitcoin hashrate dropped and time between finding blocks increased noticeably. coincidence?!!
SV (craigs drama) was november
bitcoins hashrate was OCTOBER
chicken / egg
the whole idea of SV was not to actually do anything. but to take an oppertunity of buying/leasing cheap hashpower and falsely proclaim he is influencing and stealing hashpower and doing things/causing trouble.
again, dont give him the pleasure of making him think his fake fame game is working, ignore the altcoin drama
the reality is a shift from old ASICs to new asics.
those involved knew before summer that a ASIC switch over was going to occur by Q4.
the SV drama was a effect, not a cause
Most folks don't even know who really won the Bcash / ABC / SV 'hash' wars ...
there is no winner as long as they both exist and can take hash rate from bitcoin's network! the war has a winner when the other side(s) gets annihilated, or at least we see one 51% attack from one chain against the other. SV is a good candidate for getting 51% attacked since it has a low hashrate already .
A 'winner' was / has already been declared, by some ... (certainly by definition of network 'hash' power / block count / stats. etc.,) ...
- https://coin.dance/
...
I do network security work myself. I spend half my day improving network security and preventing DDoS attacks.
~ Not sure why some accounts seem to be trying to draw me into such conversations as of late?
...
The Broken - Episode 1 - Kevin Rose first solo project *Satire* *NSFW*
- https://youtu.be/oYYnF1ZeOo8?t=474
For the cost of a postage stamp anyone can verify if CSW filed the blacknet abstract to the australian government in 2001
With this knowledge trading based on that information before it's public is easy.
Has to be hand written and mailed.
https://www.oaic.gov.au/freedom-of-information/faqs-for-individuals/how-do-i-make-a-freedom-of-information-request
Surely CW being a billionaire knows whats at stake with fraudulent claims and isnt wanting jail time. He would ruin himself is this doesn't exist.
both cash and SV didnt 'take' hashrate away
both cash and SV didnt influence bitcoin
both cash and SV didnt influence bitcoin
in other words you are trying to say that it was a coincidence that exactly at the same time as these forks occurred bitcoin hashrate went down. not to mention the EDA shenanigans of BCH and the fact that each time they reduced the difficulty bitcoin hashrate dropped and time between finding blocks increased noticeably. coincidence?!!
Most folks don't even know who really won the Bcash / ABC / SV 'hash' wars ...
there is no winner as long as they both exist and can take hash rate from bitcoin's network! the war has a winner when the other side(s) gets annihilated, or at least we see one 51% attack from one chain against the other. SV is a good candidate for getting 51% attacked since it has a low hashrate already .
both cash and SV didnt 'take' hashrate away
both cash and SV didnt influence bitcoin
in sepember/october (BEFORE SV) there was news of new next gen ASICs hitting the markets by december. so pools slowly wanted to sell off the old (s9) asics whil the S9 had value still. so an october(emphasis BEFORE SV hashdrama) curvedown of hashrate occured.
ofcourse the altcoin drama thought they would take the oppertunity to buy that cheap old tech and start some drama pretending they were somehow involved/cause or effect...
meanwhile. bitcoin network pools thought they would see an early influx of next gen asics and a few pools getting to be the testing ground (QC checks) before the actual release.
but things have been sluggish on that front. whether it be TSMC not producing asics quick enough or just holding out and spreading the batches out a bit to avoid a massive onramp of hashpower on the network.
either way cash/sv did not influence bitcoin.. it was the other way round
Most folks don't even know who really won the Bcash / ABC / SV 'hash' wars ...
there is no winner as long as they both exist and can take hash rate from bitcoin's network! the war has a winner when the other side(s) gets annihilated, or at least we see one 51% attack from one chain against the other. SV is a good candidate for getting 51% attacked since it has a low hashrate already .
Is he for real? He doesn't seem fraudulent to me.
No he is not. This is very bad case of insane need of media attention and beign important for his imaginary reasons 
... whatever lie is needed for that, he will give it all.Not serious person, attention seeker that is all.
Start a petition to boycott any and all crypto conferences where Craig Wright is schedule to speak, albeit allowing him to attend for possible shit slinging by attendees ...
Ineffectual because "crypto" conference have long been thoroughly overrun with scammers. Everyone who takes a strongly principled position on not attending events with scammer sponsors or speakers are already rejecting almost all events in this space.Scammers just get a much larger marginal return from promotional activities like conference speaking/sponsorships. Conferences are almost all run as money making enterprises, so the fact that they're saturated with scammers is unsurprising.
every time there has been big "bitcoin consensus" meetings/conventions. seems some 'hey look what CW is upto' drama begins.
seriously folks. he aint worth anyones time.
if you care about bitcoin. still to looking at what the bitcoin devs are upto not the altcoin social drama.
let the CW drama belong in a court room
seriously folks. he aint worth anyones time.
if you care about bitcoin. still to looking at what the bitcoin devs are upto not the altcoin social drama.
let the CW drama belong in a court room
So what you're sayin' is automatically 'facepalm' and yawn at Craig Wright, eh?
every time there has been big "bitcoin consensus" meetings/conventions. seems some 'hey look what CW is upto' drama begins.
seriously folks. he aint worth anyones time.
if you care about bitcoin. stick to looking at what the bitcoin devs are upto not the altcoin social drama.
let the CW drama belong in a court room
seriously folks. he aint worth anyones time.
if you care about bitcoin. stick to looking at what the bitcoin devs are upto not the altcoin social drama.
let the CW drama belong in a court room
...
best let the FIAT industry handle his scammy shinanigans and let it become news about him scamming FIAT. rather than bing bitcoin negative issue
best let the FIAT industry handle his scammy shinanigans and let it become news about him scamming FIAT. rather than bing bitcoin negative issue
Amen on that, but there's new Drama Incomming at the "U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission" whom I would link to the FIAT industry.
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969
So going short on popcorn could be pure bancrupty asap.
Quote
From: Craig S Wright
Organization(s): nChain Ltd University of Leicester, UK
Comment No: 61969
Date: 2/15/2019
Comment Text:
This is a response in generalized format to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, request for input on crypto asset mechanics and markets. My name is Dr. Craig Wright and under the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto I completed a project I started in 1997 that was filed with the Australian government in part under an AusIndustry project registered with the Dept. of Innovation as BlackNet.
Organization(s): nChain Ltd University of Leicester, UK
Comment No: 61969
Date: 2/15/2019
Comment Text:
This is a response in generalized format to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, request for input on crypto asset mechanics and markets. My name is Dr. Craig Wright and under the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto I completed a project I started in 1997 that was filed with the Australian government in part under an AusIndustry project registered with the Dept. of Innovation as BlackNet.
Quote
The amount of misunderstanding and fallacious information that has been propagated concerning bitcoin and any derivative system based on a blockchain (such as and including Ethereum) has resulted in my choice to start to become more public. The system I created was designed in part to end fraud as best as that can be done with any technology.
Juxtapose the above with the following excerpts from "Mr Bitcoin: 'I don't want money, I don't want fame!' BBC News" ...
...
best let the FIAT industry handle his scammy shinanigans and let it become news about him scamming FIAT. rather than bing bitcoin negative issue
best let the FIAT industry handle his scammy shinanigans and let it become news about him scamming FIAT. rather than bing bitcoin negative issue
Amen on that, but there's new Drama Incomming at the "U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission" whom I would link to the FIAT industry.
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969
So going short on popcorn could be pure bancrupty asap.
Quote
From: Craig S Wright
Organization(s): nChain Ltd University of Leicester, UK
Comment No: 61969
Date: 2/15/2019
Comment Text:
This is a response in generalized format to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, request for input on crypto asset mechanics and markets. My name is Dr. Craig Wright and under the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto I completed a project I started in 1997 that was filed with the Australian government in part under an AusIndustry project registered with the Dept. of Innovation as BlackNet.
Organization(s): nChain Ltd University of Leicester, UK
Comment No: 61969
Date: 2/15/2019
Comment Text:
This is a response in generalized format to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, request for input on crypto asset mechanics and markets. My name is Dr. Craig Wright and under the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto I completed a project I started in 1997 that was filed with the Australian government in part under an AusIndustry project registered with the Dept. of Innovation as BlackNet.
Jump to: