Topic: When Bounties are not worth the effort - Limit the numbers - page 3. (Read 677 times)
The ICO's number of participants isn't a problem for the ICO team since the more people are being lured into their project the more advertisement they can get and it would be great for the project to have a good run in the Token Sale. As for us, bounty hunters would have a smaller amount in our pocket since there is only a fixed price of tokens allotted in the campaign. So therefore, the main solution for this problem is picking an ICO which has a potential rather than joining an ICO that has too many participant's lured in it.
in my view plenty of participants will increase the percentages their project will being to sucessfully and that's why ICO owners has been considering this with accepting more participants but indeed the effect for signature campaign participants is not so good because at the end of the campaign most of them hasn't got decent payment
Yes, limiting participants on bounty campaigns will made many of bounty hunter happy as long the bounty hunter can gave true meaning to the ico campaign, because ico need to be introduced wider need to be known. Both sides should get max benefits, win win solutions.
This is true sometimes is annoying when you go through the stress of campaigning for a bounties and at the end of the day you are paid pie nut for your effort,it is worth giving limit to all signature campaign.
I have observed that many ICOs that have a signature bounty campaign end up not being worth due to the huge number of participants. I think that ICOs should limit the number of signature participants to avoid a disappointed community. ICO campaign managers could probably advise their clients about it.
I have seen only one ICO at the moment that provides a limited number of people in the signature campaign and also a fixed payment in USD for each rank. I think that is a fair way of promoting for everyone.
I have seen only one ICO at the moment that provides a limited number of people in the signature campaign and also a fixed payment in USD for each rank. I think that is a fair way of promoting for everyone.
That was not advisable to the campaign that will run ICO though. Remeber more participants = more advertising. Well that only happened on altcoin bounty. If signature campaign pay bitcoin the payment is fixef.
You can find more project where participators number is limited up to 400-600 for social campaigns and 100-150 for signatures. There are few campaigns with such conditions and high requirements to participants. But it worths to take part in them.
There are still bounties that accepting limit numbers of participants. Some bounties dont have limit numbers to joined to have their Ico become huge community. If you are not satisfied on your current campaign look for another one which you think you can earned good. I have observed that many ICOs that have a signature bounty campaign end up not being worth due to the huge number of participants. I think that ICOs should limit the number of signature participants to avoid a disappointed community. ICO campaign managers could probably advise their clients about it.
I have seen only one ICO at the moment that provides a limited number of people in the signature campaign and also a fixed payment in USD for each rank. I think that is a fair way of promoting for everyone.
I have seen only one ICO at the moment that provides a limited number of people in the signature campaign and also a fixed payment in USD for each rank. I think that is a fair way of promoting for everyone.
It's pointless for the ICO's itself. Just supports projects you like and plan to hold tokens for a while.
They are giving a hard %%% of sales. The more participants = better for ICO's.
ATTENTION
the user aceptamosbitcoin stole the user account in this forum.
You are using my name account.
I am already taking the necessary steps to be able to recover my account again.
Please ignore your comments or your signature is a scam.
You can find more project where participators number is limited up to 400-600 for social campaigns and 100-150 for signatures. There are few campaigns with such conditions and high requirements to participants. But it worths to take part in them.
Well, i believe that bounties are great efforts and worth it, as i have notice many signature campaign have limit the numbers of participants including the rank. Commonly they only accept full member and up and never accept member and jr member because they are only signature I.D compared to signature and avatar were they have a big impact to the product and to the customers. That's what i notice to the developers and managers here.
I have observed that many ICOs that have a signature bounty campaign end up not being worth due to the huge number of participants. I think that ICOs should limit the number of signature participants to avoid a disappointed community. ICO campaign managers could probably advise their clients about it.
I have seen only one ICO at the moment that provides a limited number of people in the signature campaign and also a fixed payment in USD for each rank. I think that is a fair way of promoting for everyone.
I have observed that too but it is the bounty managers decision if he want to limit his participants or not. To the company's side, the more the better, they will benefit from it because many users are wearing their signatures. On the bounty hunters side, he has to choice which bounty campaign could give him more reward at the end. Bottom line, we all have the free will and no one force us to join a certain bounty campaign. I have seen only one ICO at the moment that provides a limited number of people in the signature campaign and also a fixed payment in USD for each rank. I think that is a fair way of promoting for everyone.
You can find more project where participators number is limited up to 400-600 for social campaigns and 100-150 for signatures. There are few campaigns with such conditions and high requirements to participants. But it worths to take part in them.
For ICO ads it is better for them to have many participant as many as they can to promote the coin, they need more exposure than existing coin in the market, limiting the participant will give them less exposure. Plus it is depend on the marketing strategy of the Company and the agreement of the campaign manager...
Well, it depends on your choice what ICO/Bounty campaign you want to jump in!
GOOD LUCK AND HAPPY EARNING!
Well, it depends on your choice what ICO/Bounty campaign you want to jump in!
GOOD LUCK AND HAPPY EARNING!
We made additional bounty functionality to our ecex.exchange platform project: Ziggurat token TELEGRAM BOUNTY - JOIN OUR CHANNEL AND GET 30 ZIG
IN-HOUSE BOUNTY https://ecex.exchange
Telegram https://t.me/ZigguratICO
IN-HOUSE BOUNTY https://ecex.exchange
Telegram https://t.me/ZigguratICO
All of their bounty programs have their own rules and rights. It is only for us to decide either to join the campaign bounty or not. There are many bounties there bro, you can join any that suits your rank and needs. But I see your point and I think it is great.
If you go to bitcoin services, you'll see signature campaign that limits the number of participants aswell as the price is fixed at certian amount in USD, but in the alt coin section i dont see any signature campaign that limits the participants because the clients wants more participant so that they can be advertise very well.
If you want to earn alot in bounty i think it is a matter of picking what bounty project to join because there are some project ended up booming in the market and with that can get earnings.
If you want to earn alot in bounty i think it is a matter of picking what bounty project to join because there are some project ended up booming in the market and with that can get earnings.
Depends on the manager also.
If he doesnt care about the price that will be paid specially when it is at stakes then it will not be worth it.
If you already felt that then jump to another campaign.
You will always have a choice.
That is why we have to hand pick the ICO's that are here. Their marketing strategist should always care about everyome who will join it. Even if it is just bounties, some who joins there wants to support and also buyers.
If he doesnt care about the price that will be paid specially when it is at stakes then it will not be worth it.
If you already felt that then jump to another campaign.
You will always have a choice.
That is why we have to hand pick the ICO's that are here. Their marketing strategist should always care about everyome who will join it. Even if it is just bounties, some who joins there wants to support and also buyers.
i'm in favor of limitation but still for what it's worth doing campaign is free money.
ICOs are aimed to be promoted why would they limit the participants for the sake of stakes?No,they wont do that they dont mind how much these bountt hunters earned they just want their ICOs to achieve success.But i like the idea of limiting the members of a bounty campaign,it will prevent shitposters from spamming here in bitcointalk.
They prefer more participants because they want more coverage for their project so of course more participants is welcome. As a bounty hunter you should check first and try to count how much you'll get, sometimes it's not worth to enter a campaign where the participant already a lot even though it's a good project.
The only advantage of joining a signature bounty campaigns that has very few participants is participants will get huge amount of bounty stakes upon distribution.
Otherwise, when your are joining when a signature bounty campaigns that has many bounty participants will cause into less bounty campaign distribution stakes. That's why some some unsuccessful ICOs are due to limited bounty campaign participants because there are only few members who are wearing ICO signatures in the forum that will cause limit on advertising.
While some participants complain about social media campaign where they can only receive a very little amount of token due to a very crowded participants. It will be better for bounty hunters if that's the case but i don't think majority of ICO would agree with the idea because for them, the more people will participate, the better their ICO will be advertised and promoted.
I think the fact that project developers do not want to think about earning bounty hunters, because they are more concerned with how many people will come to the ICO, so I think that they do not care.
Jump to: