When Bounties are not worth the effort - Limit the numbers - page 5.

owlman

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 100

Quote from: paxmao on February 08, 2018, 06:23:31 AM

I have observed that many ICOs that have a signature bounty campaign end up not being worth due to the huge number of participants. I think that ICOs should limit the number of signature participants to avoid a disappointed community. ICO campaign managers could probably advise their clients about it.

I have seen only one ICO at the moment that provides a limited number of people in the signature campaign and also a fixed payment in USD for each rank. I think that is a fair way of promoting for everyone.

There are a lot of ICO projects, and they are all completely different. Each signature program has its own rules and limitations and we just need to either accept the rules or not participate there. That's all.

Yudhisthir

full member

Activity: 1060

Merit: 103

There are many signature bounty campaign running but most of the users are lured to one which has designated larger fund for the bounty and at last decreasing everyones share while other ICO's are not getting enough participants.
It doesn't make any difference for the bounty issuing company as whatever be the number of participants, the payment would be same as designated and they would love large number. So, it all comes to the user to choose which would yield better for them.

Jarx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 253

Quote from: paxmao on February 08, 2018, 06:23:31 AM

I have observed that many ICOs that have a signature bounty campaign end up not being worth due to the huge number of participants. I think that ICOs should limit the number of signature participants to avoid a disappointed community.

Well at least a half of modern ICOs are going that way. They put a limit on every rank, kinda "hero - 30; Sr. Member - 20; Member - 10" and sort of that.

De_nis

full member

Activity: 560

Merit: 109

Quote from: paxmao on February 08, 2018, 06:23:31 AM

I have observed that many ICOs that have a signature bounty campaign end up not being worth due to the huge number of participants. I think that ICOs should limit the number of signature participants to avoid a disappointed community. ICO campaign managers could probably advise their clients about it.

I have seen only one ICO at the moment that provides a limited number of people in the signature campaign and also a fixed payment in USD for each rank. I think that is a fair way of promoting for everyone.

I also noticed that the more the company says that it spends bounty, the more likely that the purpose of this company is only dishonest gain!

Lerikaweb

member

Activity: 392

Merit: 12

The Fourth Generation of Blockchain in DeFi

It is extremely unprofitable for ICOs:) this is why they will not make such a limitation. If you are disappointed with what you receive for a campaign - it is always up to you not to take it. Start trading on the stock or do whatever else you will be happy with

and ICOs need as much advertising as possible for the same token amount. So limitation of participants' number will make ad campaign less efficient, but more expensive.

paxmao

legendary

Activity: 2366

Merit: 1624

Do not die for Putin

I have observed that many ICOs that have a signature bounty campaign end up not being worth due to the huge number of participants. I think that ICOs should limit the number of signature participants to avoid a disappointed community. ICO campaign managers could probably advise their clients about it.

I have seen only one ICO at the moment that provides a limited number of people in the signature campaign and also a fixed payment in USD for each rank. I think that is a fair way of promoting for everyone.

Topic: When Bounties are not worth the effort - Limit the numbers - page 5. (Read 677 times)