Pages:
Author

Topic: Where are those Bitshares' Shills? - page 4. (Read 3824 times)

hero member
Activity: 547
Merit: 502
March 15, 2015, 11:15:33 PM
#13
Learn to use apostrophe marks

BItshares(TM), the company, owns everything including their shills.  It's possessive moron.

I have just been pondering how to answer your last question

Glad you're still around Stan.  I was worried that I was going to have to find a new form of entertainment.

I have read some of your posts about BitShares however can you explain why BitShares does not work technically?
I'd like to know your thoughts on this as well. Where's the serious discourse? Your rambling posts just make you look desperate to drag a competitor through the mud.

How can Stan (or anyone else) defend BTS if you can't hold a serious conversation?

I've stated numerous times that attempting to peg a virtual, non-redeemable derivatives contract to the price of a physical asset is doomed to fail because the "bitAsset", as you like to call your derivatives contracts, have none of the attributes (aka intrinsic value) of the real asset.  I also think it is highly unethical to advertise your BTS derivatives contracts as "assets" and claim that they're "Safer than a Swiss Bank Account".  Imo, this whole BTS garbage is a blatant money grabbing attempt by I3 directed towards those who don't have a firm grasp of economics.  Mark my words, the pegs will fail and the people who will lose money will be those who can least afford to lose it.

At a high level BitShares themselves are the value place holder are they not?  BitShares, just like Bitcoin holds value while being a complete virtual object.

How far down the rabbit hole do you want to go?
http://bytemaster.bitshares.org/article/2015/01/15/Is-Fractional-Reserve-Banking-a-Ponzi-Scheme/
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
March 15, 2015, 12:55:15 PM
#12
Quote from: DecentralizeEconomics
I've stated numerous times that attempting to peg a virtual, non-redeemable derivatives contract to the price of a physical asset is doomed to fail because the "bitAsset", as you like to call your derivatives contracts, have none of the attributes (aka intrinsic value) of the real asset.  I also think it is highly unethical to advertise your BTS derivatives contracts as "assets" and claim that they're "Safer than a Swiss Bank Account".  Imo, this whole BTS garbage is a blatant money grabbing attempt by I3 directed towards those who don't have a firm grasp of economics.  Mark my words, the pegs will fail and the people who will lose money will be those who can least afford to lose it.

Why you give just an "opinion"(imo) and not an honest opinion(imho)? It seems that you try to retain some of your honesty by not giving a honest opinion. In any way, it seems that lots of people disagree with you...



"....BitSharesX introduces the concept of “BitAssets.” BitSharesX is significant because nobody has tried to implement such a system before. This system is a high speed, easily accessible Forex/Stock/Commodities/etc market. BTSX could become one of the most exciting developments in cryptographic history.

BitShares is one of the numerous technologies claiming to be “bitcoin 2.0” or “finance 2.0.” In essence, this “Bitcoin 2.0” movement represents a movement to leverage the power of globally decentralized consensus and decision making networks as birthed by bitcoin. The notion behind “bitcoin 2.0” technologies is that the idea of bitcoin can be expanded upon and applied to various sectors of the global economy and, particularly, finance. In short, “consensus technology has the power to do for economics what the internet did for information.” Theoretically, one such network could arbitrage the combined power of all human computing power on Earth in order to harmonize real-time knowledge discovery and aggregation all done in a trustless, decentralized manner.

Bitcoin is the first autonomous system to use this technology towards a distributed consensus technology that functions as a reliable global payment network. The blockchain is at the core of bitcoin. This cryptographically secured public ledger of the bitcoin network and the associated accounts facilitates the transfer of value between accounts. For the first time in the history of the internet, financial transactions do not need a middle man.

This is what people love about bitcoin. But this technology, as many of bitcoin’s futurists point out, can be expanded. This is what BitShares looks to do with the blockchain. No industry relying on the internet will go untouched by technologies like bitcoin and BitShares. Banking, stock exchanges, lotteries, voting, music, auctions and many other industries will be forever changed by a digital public ledger that makes the creation of so-called “distributed autonomous corporations” (DACs) possible. This system, according to advocates of “bitcoin 2.0”, will provide better services at a fraction of the cost incurred by traditional and centralized corporations.....
"


http://www.maxkeiser.com/2014/11/this-little-known-crypto-asset-might-disrupt-the-current-financial-order/#OkJ6mXxICkEL4AaO.99
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
March 15, 2015, 12:20:03 PM
#11
They are busy to change their 'social contract' again.

Link?
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 250
March 15, 2015, 09:35:53 AM
#10
They are busy to change their 'social contract' again.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
March 15, 2015, 05:48:47 AM
#9
Learn to use apostrophe marks

BItshares(TM), the company, owns everything including their shills.  It's possessive moron.

I have just been pondering how to answer your last question

Glad you're still around Stan.  I was worried that I was going to have to find a new form of entertainment.

I have read some of your posts about BitShares however can you explain why BitShares does not work technically?
I'd like to know your thoughts on this as well. Where's the serious discourse? Your rambling posts just make you look desperate to drag a competitor through the mud.

How can Stan (or anyone else) defend BTS if you can't hold a serious conversation?

I've stated numerous times that attempting to peg a virtual, non-redeemable derivatives contract to the price of a physical asset is doomed to fail because the "bitAsset", as you like to call your derivatives contracts, have none of the attributes (aka intrinsic value) of the real asset.  I also think it is highly unethical to advertise your BTS derivatives contracts as "assets" and claim that they're "Safer than a Swiss Bank Account".  Imo, this whole BTS garbage is a blatant money grabbing attempt by I3 directed towards those who don't have a firm grasp of economics.  Mark my words, the pegs will fail and the people who will lose money will be those who can least afford to lose it.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
21 million. I want them all.
March 15, 2015, 04:27:32 AM
#8
Learn to use apostrophe marks

Learn to use periods, or maybe you are on one right now?


You got me there
member
Activity: 260
Merit: 10
March 14, 2015, 08:23:37 PM
#7
Learn to use apostrophe marks

Learn to use periods, or maybe you are on one right now?
sr. member
Activity: 326
Merit: 250
King of all the land
March 14, 2015, 02:10:02 PM
#6
Where are those Bitshills?  I haven't seen Stan or any other Bitshares' cheerleader post for a while.  Have they been told to be quiet and are finally listening?  I doubt it.  My best guess is that they have been bound and gagged to prevent further blunders or kidnapped by their Chinese Communist co-conspirators.  Maybe, they are too busy dumping their Bitshares(TM) shares on the market to post.  I don't know.  Stan where are you?

DecentralizeEconomics

I have read some of your posts about BitShares however can you explain why BitShares does not work technically?

I'd like to know your thoughts on this as well. Where's the serious discourse? Your rambling posts just make you look desperate to drag a competitor through the mud.

How can Stan (or anyone else) defend BTS if you can't hold a serious conversation?
hero member
Activity: 547
Merit: 502
March 14, 2015, 12:45:44 PM
#5
Where are those Bitshills?  I haven't seen Stan or any other Bitshares' cheerleader post for a while.  Have they been told to be quiet and are finally listening?  I doubt it.  My best guess is that they have been bound and gagged to prevent further blunders or kidnapped by their Chinese Communist co-conspirators.  Maybe, they are too busy dumping their Bitshares(TM) shares on the market to post.  I don't know.  Stan where are you?

DecentralizeEconomics

I have read some of your posts about BitShares however can you explain why BitShares does not work technically?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
21 million. I want them all.
March 14, 2015, 09:26:23 AM
#4
Learn to use apostrophe marks
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 504
March 14, 2015, 09:15:16 AM
#3

I have just been pondering how to answer your last question:


You need to think BIGGER, Pinky!


Stan, maybe you could answer a question for me that I've been having trouble with...  Between you and Dan, which one of you is supposed to be "The Brain"?  Hahaha



I even wrote it up in a little rhyme so you'll be able to remember it:

No matter how brilliant
Dan has proven to be,
he is still just Pinky
in a photo with me.




(Of course, in the featured quote, I was addressing you.)  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
March 14, 2015, 04:30:30 AM
#2
Where are those Bitshills?  I haven't seen Stan or any other Bitshares' cheerleader post for a while.  Have they been told to be quiet and are finally listening?  I doubt it.  My best guess is that they have been bound and gagged to prevent further blunders or kidnapped by their Chinese Communist co-conspirators.  Maybe, they are too busy dumping their Bitshares(TM) shares on the market to post.  I don't know.  Stan where are you?

Heard there were plans for a new sca.. ah, i mean new asset. Much combining and printing of new coins to happen real soon
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
March 13, 2015, 11:54:57 PM
#1
Where are those Bitshills?  I haven't seen Stan or any other Bitshares' cheerleader post for a while.  Have they been told to be quiet and are finally listening?  I doubt it.  My best guess is that they have been bound and gagged to prevent further blunders or kidnapped by their Chinese Communist co-conspirators.  Maybe, they are too busy dumping their Bitshares(TM) shares on the market to post.  I don't know.  Stan where are you?
Pages:
Jump to: