Topic: Where do you look for verified information about crypto and ICO? - page 3. (Read 253 times)
thank you for sharing this very helpful i see ico that has potential and i as a bounty hunter, this also became my reference to participate in bounty campaign
I have never really been a fan of relying on analysts or whoever it is in making quality decisions. This is my money and I do proper digging and research myself to know which project I should be investing in, why I should be investing in it, and what I stand to gain if it ends up working out well and this is where the idea of checking for product abaialbility, a team that looks like can deliver and the prospect of the coin or token generating huge demand based on the product in future. As long as you are an investor, you have to do it yourself.
I see your point and can agree with that but you can't say anything about the project if you don't make some research before, that's why at least on the first step any investor is looking for some information, after makes some analysis and then decides by relying on his own thoughts, previous experience, the idea of an ICO and so on
I normally just look for reviews in various places, not the standard sites like ICOBench though.
Can you clarify, please, where do you look?
I normally just look for reviews in various places, not the standard sites like ICOBench though.
if u are looking for verified ico results then u need to check this website on regular basics they are icorating.com and ccn.com both the website exclusive information about upcoming ico programs
Yes, thanks. But what about other crypto-things like agencies, media and so on? I realised that we don't have a big choice of such resources where all the info is collected together, that is why i think that https://forico.io/ has really great point.
Maybe you know something else like this?
Cool that you support me. I was thinking about ICO bench also, a lot of info and its rather well structured
if u are looking for verified ico results then u need to check this website on regular basics they are icorating.com and ccn.com both the website exclusive information about upcoming ico programs
Yes, thanks. But what about other crypto-things like agencies, media and so on? I realised that we don't have a big choice of such resources where all the info is collected together, that is why i think that https://forico.io/ has really great point.
Maybe you know something else like this?
if u are looking for verified ico results then u need to check this website on regular basics they are icorating.com and ccn.com both the website exclusive information about upcoming ico programs
I have never really been a fan of relying on analysts or whoever it is in making quality decisions. This is my money and I do proper digging and research myself to know which project I should be investing in, why I should be investing in it, and what I stand to gain if it ends up working out well and this is where the idea of checking for product abaialbility, a team that looks like can deliver and the prospect of the coin or token generating huge demand based on the product in future. As long as you are an investor, you have to do it yourself.
It might be a good site, but do you really want to rely on a single source? Check multiple ones.
They might make mistakes in terms of rating, possibly resulting bad decision making.
Also, there are plenty of factors, you should check their telegram, bitcointalk ANN thread, etc.
And you should take a look into the project. The "professionals" rating these ICOs spend little time on judging each ICO, so you should do a deeo research on the project you want to invest into.
Check the feasibility of their main idea, check the credibility and try to judge the competency of their team, and the connections they have. These factors are possibly the most important ones.
Then, have a read on the whitepaper (again), paying attention on what have been emphasized, what words did they use and what might be the meaning behind it. After translating 3 Whitepapers, I realised there can be so much hidden meaning behind the most frequently used words - and plenty of times, in negative ways.
So all in all, I'd say dont rely on a single source, and do your research.
Best of luck investing into ICOs!
They might make mistakes in terms of rating, possibly resulting bad decision making.
Also, there are plenty of factors, you should check their telegram, bitcointalk ANN thread, etc.
And you should take a look into the project. The "professionals" rating these ICOs spend little time on judging each ICO, so you should do a deeo research on the project you want to invest into.
Check the feasibility of their main idea, check the credibility and try to judge the competency of their team, and the connections they have. These factors are possibly the most important ones.
Then, have a read on the whitepaper (again), paying attention on what have been emphasized, what words did they use and what might be the meaning behind it. After translating 3 Whitepapers, I realised there can be so much hidden meaning behind the most frequently used words - and plenty of times, in negative ways.
So all in all, I'd say dont rely on a single source, and do your research.
Best of luck investing into ICOs!
I personally look for the projects at www.icoguide.com - the platform makes it easy to compare ICOs at the home page, without going to the particular project descriptions, besides rates seems to be not paid.
Thanks for the link! But there are only ICOs, and I would like to get more info about the crypto-world in one place;)
Actually, ICOBench is a good site, they give an honest opinion about the projects, and the main rate is made by experts who are independent.
Yes, but since they've started to ask money for becoming an expert, I'm not sure that i can trust their ratings..
Yes, the best way to make a right decision is to check on more or less verified websites and after decide by your own research!
I personally look for the projects at www.icoguide.com - the platform makes it easy to compare ICOs at the home page, without going to the particular project descriptions, besides rates seems to be not paid.
Actually, ICOBench is a good site, they give an honest opinion about the projects, and the main rate is made by experts who are independent.
Yes, but since they've started to ask money for becoming an expert, I'm not sure that i can trust their ratings..
Actually, ICOBench is a good site, they give an honest opinion about the projects, and the main rate is made by experts who are independent.
Yes, but since they've started to ask money for becoming an expert, I'm not sure that i can trust their ratings..
Great service, i like that everything is connected (like ICOs with experts, agencies with projects and so on). I would like to see there more ICOs and maybe some "News" section.
Actually, i was also thinking about that
Thanks for your opinion 
Actually, ICOBench is a good site, they give an honest opinion about the projects, and the main rate is made by experts who are independent.
Great service, i like that everything is connected (like ICOs with experts, agencies with projects and so on). I would like to see there more ICOs and maybe some "News" section.
You shpuld not be depending on any one platform to get your information about ICO's or any new crypto related projects. Best place is here at bitcointalk, then there are other places like twiiter, telegram and discord channels of the particular project that you may be interested in.
Thank you for your advice! Maybe you can advice me which channels exactly?
Thanks for sharing, interesting platform, but i don't understand how exactly they decide about the rating
You shpuld not be depending on any one platform to get your information about ICO's or any new crypto related projects. Best place is here at bitcointalk, then there are other places like twiiter, telegram and discord channels of the particular project that you may be interested in.
Jump to: