Topic: Where WOULDN'T you travel? - page 8. (Read 1703 times)
N. Korea must be the worst place to visit
Middle East, or any other place where my safety isn't 100% guaranteed.
I've got numerous friends who keep going to unsafe places and I just don't get why they'd do that. Why take any chances when your life could be at stake?
I've got numerous friends who keep going to unsafe places and I just don't get why they'd do that. Why take any chances when your life could be at stake?
I wouldn't travel to Asia. Cause you gotta do lots of vaccinations before you go to India for example. And also there's a completely different structure of water and of lots of other products
Afghanistan or war zone, nothing to gain by going in there unless you are humanitarian activist.
I wouldnt travel to the middle east. Why? Simply because of the risk of terror. Otherwise I would love to go there - so much history to see.
I will not go to countries that are at war like the Palestinians, here the likelihood will be to safety for me ..
romania, nothin that interests me in that country
Nothing too hot and humid at the same time, nothing poorly developed and highly religious.
Florida. No reason needed really. But last time I had to travel there I saw on the news where a couple of homeless guys were found eating other homeless peoples faces off. They were literally naked homeless zombies walking about and no one batted an eye.
Never again and I've served in the US Army.
Quote
Oh its Florida? Well there you go.
Never again and I've served in the US Army.
I always dreamt of visiting Mexico, but recently I read a lot of stories about local drug dealers and people' murders. I couldn't even imagine that this sunny country is so dangerous.
In contrast to the "Where would you travel?" thread.
I'm curious where and why people wouldn't travel to a country. Personal dislike, econimic reasons, political etc. North Korea goes without saying
North Korea, Iraq and places where there are war.. I'm curious where and why people wouldn't travel to a country. Personal dislike, econimic reasons, political etc. North Korea goes without saying
I want to travel to all famous places around the world 
I'm not so sure, but do not want to travel to Suriname
Alaska. I'm sure it's a great place with lots of beautiful, stunning sceneries, but it's just too damn cold ; )
i probably wouldn't travel to india or iraq or any places like that.
Okay i get regions in war/crisis. But why not India, i guess it's pretty safe for westerners.
i probably wouldn't travel to india or iraq or any places like that.
In contrast to the "Where would you travel?" thread.
I'm curious where and why people wouldn't travel to a country. Personal dislike, econimic reasons, political etc. North Korea goes without saying
I am not going to go into a conflict country because I still want to live, I would rather go to a place where it is not yet known by the media, it would be great to seek my own adventure in my own way I'm curious where and why people wouldn't travel to a country. Personal dislike, econimic reasons, political etc. North Korea goes without saying
I think North Korea is on top of most peoples list.
I would like to travel to many different parts of the world but if you ask me where wouldn't I travel, its a really tough question because for me I would like to visit any places to see and experience new stuff but I don't think I will visit places full of insects and mosquitoes because I cannot stand the itchiness and it will make my travel a bad one.
lha da Queimada Grande (Brazil). The reason for this is quite simple — this place is full of one of the most venomous snakes in the world, Researchers estimate that about five snakes per square meter live on the island. Snake Island’s lighthouse has been automated ever since that fatality, and the Brazilian government has prohibited any visitors from setting foot there. 
Jump to: