it depends on the action bounty hunter, what they do when they get paid for they work, whether they trade or they sell it at once, in my opinion the bounty hunters will not affect the increase in volume
I don't agree with you. Bounty hunters also participate in every trade with buying and selling the coin. They mainly sell for the low profit but I can't blame bounty hunter for their behaviour. They are paid for a job and they deserve to get payment with selling the coin for cash. 
Topic: whether a bounty hunter can help increase trading volume? (Read 704 times)
BS IMO
it depends on the action bounty hunter, what they do when they get paid for they work, whether they trade or they sell it at once, in my opinion the bounty hunters will not affect the increase in volume
That is, as "will not affect"? If several bounty hunters trade their assets, they increase the volume of trade. This is especially true for illiquid assets. Perhaps assets with trading volumes of several thousand dollars are being created by bounty hunters. Investors do not trade, hardly anyone else is interested in illiquid assets.
most bounty hunters participate in promoting large projects managed by a company that wants to successfully run the project to be developed, project managers can provide potential coins such as bitcoin and ethereum to bounty hunters who participate to promote it. Does the weekly or monthly payment that a manager can provide can encourage growth in market price movements?
because surely some of them always trade every week or monthly after being paid because they need money for their needs.
Is this one of the factors that can increase trading volume other than large investors who can influence market prices?
because surely some of them always trade every week or monthly after being paid because they need money for their needs.
Is this one of the factors that can increase trading volume other than large investors who can influence market prices?
Unfortunately, we seldom saw ICO paying their bounty with a tradeable coin in the market like Bitcoin, Ethereum, bounty hunters will prefer these options when they see one, ICO now are more preferred to pay with their own token, keeping tradeable they accumulate, because it's double for them.
Oh yeah, sure! Bounty hunters contribute a greater part to the growth and development of many coins. In fact, when you examine the contracts of many ETH-based tokens, you'll find that the number of token holders only increase after bounty payments, and that's a major contributor to decentralization. Moreover, there are bounty hunters who're also traders and investors and as such the better they see a coin to be, the more they invest or trade into it helping build/develop that particular coin.
it depends on the action bounty hunter, what they do when they get paid for they work, whether they trade or they sell it at once, in my opinion the bounty hunters will not affect the increase in volume
I don't agree with you. Bounty hunters also participate in every trade with buying and selling the coin. They mainly sell for the low profit but I can't blame bounty hunter for their behaviour. They are paid for a job and they deserve to get payment with selling the coin for cash. 
Bounty hunter can increase market volume and can reduce prices drastically, after every bounty distribution I often see prices can go down dramatically and if the volume can reach minus 20 percent, this can be avoided if the bounty should be paid for btc or ether, this is good solution.
there aren't many ico who pay their campaign participants with certain coins. most of them give their tokens as payment for campaign participants. paying with btc or eth and other altcoins I think it's good but not all projects think that way.
it depends on the action bounty hunter, what they do when they get paid for they work, whether they trade or they sell it at once, in my opinion the bounty hunters will not affect the increase in volume
Every project would want their tokens to be traded and have large volume in the crypto martket and this is why the project managers do not want to give bitcoins or ether to the promoters. Most of the devs believe that bounty hunters hold just an insignificant of the total supply but they can trigger trading on the exchanges.
I do not actually think tokens are given with the purpose of increasing the trading volume because they could have done it on their own but it is because they cherish those ETH and BTC than their own coins/tokens.
I do not actually think tokens are given with the purpose of increasing the trading volume because they could have done it on their own but it is because they cherish those ETH and BTC than their own coins/tokens.
Bounty hunters actually can help increase trading volume in the market, that's certainly because they hold tokens resulting from bounties, even if they don't just sell as soon as possible, some even sell at high prices to raise prices, this is good
Bounty hunters will only provide a temporary boost to the volume of a coin since most of them are only interested in selling their coins as fast as they can and then they never buy those coins again, however since they are holding so few coins their impact is not as big as many people claim, the only way to increase the volume of a coin over the long term is for the developers to work hard to fulfill their promises, something that only a few do.
bounty hunters have good knowledge in most of the coins but they personally increase trading volume may nt happen but they hold most of the coins
For me bounty participant's has a role to build much higher lagre scale of trading volume because of the bounty hanters and It takes a long time before bitcoin will end.
most bounty hunters participate in promoting large projects managed by a company that wants to successfully run the project to be developed, project managers can provide potential coins such as bitcoin and ethereum to bounty hunters who participate to promote it. Does the weekly or monthly payment that a manager can provide can encourage growth in market price movements?
because surely some of them always trade every week or monthly after being paid because they need money for their needs.
Is this one of the factors that can increase trading volume other than large investors who can influence market prices?
because surely some of them always trade every week or monthly after being paid because they need money for their needs.
Is this one of the factors that can increase trading volume other than large investors who can influence market prices?
not all of them are trading their coins, most of bounty hunters are selling their coins after acquiring it and dont expect them that they are trading it also most bounty ICO wont pay in weekly or monthly basis usually they are paying after their ICO.
Bounty hunter tokens/coins are around 1% -2% and I don't think that will help increase the volume on market other than that they (bounty hunter) don't all sell at very cheap prices
I agree that bounty hunters are often accused of causing a decline in the price of tokens, even though they only hold 1% of the total supply of tokens.investors have the biggest role in the destruction of a token.
Bounty hunter can increase market volume and can reduce prices drastically, after every bounty distribution I often see prices can go down dramatically and if the volume can reach minus 20 percent, this can be avoided if the bounty should be paid for btc or ether, this is good solution.
I think what bounty hunters contribute to volume, it has only a very small effect because as you can see, the number of tokens that bounty hunters can get, it only accounts for a very small part, and the sale of these tokens, it will not create too big effects. Bounty hunters are not too powerful a factor in increasing trading volume, those who hold this role are probably investors in the project, they bought in ico time with very cheap price and huge quantity, their contribution will be very positive for trading volume 
Bounty hunter can increase market volume and can reduce prices drastically, after every bounty distribution I often see prices can go down dramatically and if the volume can reach minus 20 percent, this can be avoided if the bounty should be paid for btc or ether, this is good solution.
there aren't many ico who pay their campaign participants with certain coins. most of them give their tokens as payment for campaign participants. paying with btc or eth and other altcoins I think it's good but not all projects think that way. 
Bounty hunter can increase market volume and can reduce prices drastically, after every bounty distribution I often see prices can go down dramatically and if the volume can reach minus 20 percent, this can be avoided if the bounty should be paid for btc or ether, this is good solution.
It is possible for bounty hunters to help increase trading volume and help with listing on exchanges
There is a project called vanta which is currently doing that. the vanta bounty hunters have been asked to trade the airdrops they have been given on a particular exchange for a certain number of days so as to get the volume up and this can certainly help with listings on other exchange and help the project in a very long time.
This is a positive things that project can try.
In addition to this, I am also a bounty hunter and I have so many tokens that has not even entered exchange talk less of trading with them. I have about 100 tokens out of the 150 that I acquired that has not entered exchange, even the one that entered exchange are so low to trade with, so we just have to keep HOLDING it expecting a bull run on them. So like you said, investors and not only large investors are the major determinant of market prices. There is a project called vanta which is currently doing that. the vanta bounty hunters have been asked to trade the airdrops they have been given on a particular exchange for a certain number of days so as to get the volume up and this can certainly help with listings on other exchange and help the project in a very long time.
This is a positive things that project can try.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 2305
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Most bounty hunters just sell their token right after it get listed in exchange. In that case, it increases the trading volume. But in your OP you shared something which is not possible. No bounty hunters will buy back token later with their ETH or BTC.
most bounty hunters participate in promoting large projects managed by a company that wants to successfully run the project to be developed, project managers can provide potential coins such as bitcoin and ethereum to bounty hunters who participate to promote it. Does the weekly or monthly payment that a manager can provide can encourage growth in market price movements?
because surely some of them always trade every week or monthly after being paid because they need money for their needs.
Is this one of the factors that can increase trading volume other than large investors who can influence market prices?
This also has a way of influence the market and also play a major role in increasing trading volumes, however, the influence of their activities is so little compared to large investors are pushing up trading volumes.because surely some of them always trade every week or monthly after being paid because they need money for their needs.
Is this one of the factors that can increase trading volume other than large investors who can influence market prices?
The first question we need to ask is how much exactly project managers are being paid for it to have such a great influence on market prices, most bounty hunters can’t even trade with what they earn because they are so little depending on the value the coin was at the time of payment. The amount involved is little compared to what large investors are pumping to the markets.
Jump to: