Topic: Which Casino and Sportsbook have the best UI? Which others can improve? - page 5. (Read 1736 times)

Yeah, right!  And you stumbled upon this forum accidentally, created an account, managed to reach this section, found this thread, and wrote this post just randomly. I totally believe you, lol.

I don't understand why some people think it's so easy to fool others, and I believe it is because some people do get fooled by such things, especially newbies that have no experience at all and when they read a message like this, they think whatever written in it is true and the platforms mentioned might have these features. One shouldn't be this naive so that they don't easily become a victim of such scams and frauds. This guy is clearly promoting these platforms with this brand new account, he is either a part of them or is paid a few bucks to do this.

I like playing on XFUN and Dplay lately. No laggs, loads of choices for different games, and fast payment whenever I win. No KYC needed either. So far so good, I do hope they keep the intensity up.

Bro, it is true that we shouldn't just judge a book by its cover, but in this case, I like to start the judgement immediately. You said it right, we will first see the UI when we open any gambling platforms, and if it is bad from the beginning, it can't be appealing to me anymore no matter what you talk about. What if I opened it and it looked ugly, and upon that, it is not responsive well, do you think I can ever be interested that much even if they are reputable and will not steal my money? I don't think so. There is one being advertised on this forum and I believe that people do not appreciate it very well due to the UI issues, and even offline, I discussed it with someone and we both agreed that it could be part of the issues. So, it's very important.

It is non-negotiable as far as I am concerned, the UI and the UX must tally, and that is how I can ever move forward in even knowing the casino further. That reminds me, I couldn't continue using OKX due to this same issue, their mobile platform is just nonsense, it's slow and I couldn't bear that nonsense when I had better alternatives. I heard it is still the same still years after, I wonder why companies will be that careless despite being rich. This could totally dissuade many customers and intending ones unnoticed. But I hardly see such, to be honest, which means that casinos are often wise to know that their UI and UX are important for the productivity of their business.

Well, most of us know that things can be done better because we like the interface, however when we see that we like a casino, whether because of the interface we also have to look at other things, if the interface cannot be everything, There are also other things, for example when I'm in a casino, no matter how nice everything is, it's not nice if they scam you, it's not nice that when you go to retire they give you a lot of buts, this is what we have to see, one The interface is the best thing you can see, it's like the model of falling in love, and something we will always have as a first impression, however these things are superficial, the problem for me is always in the withdrawals, well it all comes down to money, If we can withdraw our money, then everything is fine, otherwise you can't do much, in this order of ideas we will always see what is best for everything, if we put it in context, the events can be very decisive.

For things that are interface-related, it does have a lot to do with it, personally I like comfort, and it is something that makes you feel good doing it, but in this case things are very different, because as a player you want to have Everything is up to date, but as I said, for me the most important thing in a casino is the money, the rest doesn't matter to me, that is supremely important, because money is the only thing that makes us see if we can spend more time playing or not. , and not only playing, but you also have to evaluate if the casino allows you to win, because we are not going to do much in a casino where the interface is completely different but we never win even 1 dollar, but everything is for the casino, we always have to Seeing that as the first option for rest is different if we put it in another important fact, now if we do things well, with our investigation and KYC and that everything is good from the withdrawal point of view, then everything changes.

When it comes to user interface, it is our own decision to make base on what we want and don't want, sometimes we may like some things in particular about a gambling platform while other may not, but the interface we are considering here is one of the means to which we can distinguish between our personal preference from others, it's also the first attraction that makes a gambler get fascinated to a particular gambling platform or not.

Hahaha...are you sure it is the interface that is making people to be addicted to gambling? I don't think so. Gambling is addictive itself, if someone is not careful enough, such would be addicted. The good UI and responsiveness of the casino platform are good and will go a long way to give a better user experience, but it is weak to make casinos' customers get addicted to it, it is all about the mindsets of the gambler about the game played. They should have planned better toward that to avoid issues many gamblers are just careless and reckless which often triggers their addiction to it. With poor UI, gamblers can still be addicted, they can continue to manoeuvre their way to play and will still be engrossed with it.

This is especially true if the gambler needs the money desperately or takes it as a means to have fun, but nevertheless, does it too much. If not, what will you say of the offline casinos where you will not be the operator but their representative will do the ticket issuing, but yet people are still addicted to it? In this, you do not even see any interface to get addicted to but only the feeling of betting, and most times whether good or bad outcomes, they could be what will motivate or force the gambler to come back to get it. If you gain, you might want to gain more, and if you lose, you might want to gain back your money, and before you know it, you might be addicted to it.

Betcoin has 2 sites. Here are both compared to Stake and Sportsbet.

Did you actually try it? I'm talking about one additional tap, but probably an unnecessary/avoidable action in the UI which could make it an annoying user experience. Use your iPad/tablet sideways for a wider view, then go to Stake. Tap from "Casino" to "Sports", then choose a sport.

Next, go to Shuffle then do the same actions. The side panel of Shuffle doesn't go back and forth which makes it one tap lesser. A mere ONE TAP. That simple change made its UX better for me.

Having a good UI makes sense to first attract clients but it won't keep those customers if they don't get what they want from the site after using for sometime, what matters to me when I'm visiting or making a choice of online gambling platform is about the quality of their services, I'm not really that interested in the user interface so far the site gives me quality of service, fast deposit and withdrawals and 24/7 customers service. A platform can have the best user interface but not meet their customers' demands or interests and they will still end up losing these customers. However, everyone has what that attracts them to a site when making a choice of gambling platform to use.

To my mind, Bitsler.com has the best UI. Their colour palette is amazing, the website's structure is different from other casinos and when I visit them, it doesn't feel like it's another copy-paste. I love their UI very much.
Other casinos like Sportsbet.io, livecasino, Rollbit, Stake, Duelbits, BetFury and etc have good UI, not as great as Bitsler for me but their UI is good enough to make my experience smooth.

Well, less taps means less features I believe, cus If a casino has a lot of features, then that simply and automatically translate to more taps, which means, you tap more to access all the features or a good number of it.
But for a Casino with less features, it's very understandable why it won't take more or alot of taps to navigate around such a casino and get things done, and the clear advantage here is that, things get done faster on a casino with less features, compare to the casino with more features..

Now, don't misunderstood or misquote me, I am not saying that shuffle has less features, I've never used or played on shuffle, so I think it will be inappropriate for me to judge, but what I said above is based on my observations in general terms, not talking about one casino in particular.

They have the same software provider, but the casinos use different skins and have different implementations. I'm not being biased, but IN MOBILE if you go to both sites, and compare Stake and Shuffle, it's obvious that they use one software provider, and although Stake has moderately a better UI, Shuffle has better implementation because you do less taps to use it compared to Stake. Try it.


It's the color. It's black and that probably scares the newbies?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Addiction comes from our mind, from our feeling, it has nothing to do with the UI or everything you can see and find in the casino.
Even if the casino looks very simple, provide so less feature compared to other casino, some will stilll be addicted if they cant control themselves.
When you are saying that great UI lead into addiction, means that you are blaming the casino to have great UI but in fact the one should be blamed is the gambler when he/she is getting addicted.
Gamblers should be responsible for themselves, addiction is their own mistake, not other's.

This repetition of one thing over and over and over again makes no sense, and besides, I disagree with you, a really good UI does attract gamblers but does not keep gamblers if the casino lack good features and games gamblers are interested in playing.

So, let's just say that if you build a casino and make it good looking to the eyes, sure thing is that gambler will come in, but if your casinos doesn't have good features, attractive games for gambler to play, they all will definitely move away to another casino that have this things.
So, the best way to compliment a casino with really good UI, is to give good features too, make alot of games available to gamblers, have a vip ranking systems, provide good bonuses and so on, this way, gamblers will play on that casino for a very long time, and even if they leave to try another casino, they will always come back.

I believe that the interface of a casino does not lead to any chaos of addiction, because even the simplest interface is the one that cannot lead to being addicted if one does not know how to control it, I believe that the interface of a casino has to be the same. most striking, the most beautiful so that they stay there and like to interact, I think that when things are tried to be done better, it has to improve according to the demands of the clients, sometimes it is good that they make a survey in the casinos so that they can ask themselves what should be done, what they need to change and how they will feel better,

I am sure that if they put an interface where they give free rules, satoshis, that also have faucets, all this is only what can be manifested in the interface of the caisnso, when I go to a caisno we are always wondering what they can give, what they can offer, that can be done by online casinos, that is something that will always manifest itself.

Yes you are right.  The better the casino interface.  The more users will be addicted to that casino, the better the quality of that casino will be.  Gamblers will stay there longer.  People will become more addicted to it.  The more attractive the casino site is, the more the gamblers will be attracted to it.People will pay more attention to the fact that Ui Jeter will be beautiful. People will pay more attention to the casino that feels good.  So the better the interface of the casino, the more addicted people will be.

The interface makes an impression on players. especially for new visitors, because seeing a nice and attractive interface can provide comfort to players. At least it shows the seriousness of the casino developer towards players.
but it cannot be denied that there are also players who prefer a simple and easy-to-operate interface. some emphasize certain types of games. the growth of the gambling industry is very large. and slot games are probably the ones that are currently very popular.

It is just for attraction mate and of course to bring best impressions for the new enters , having
great UI will also gives good chance of making that visitors to be depositors  and yes I am also one that seeks
for better UI/Interface than those random site that obviously created without good budget at all , because
those who have good interface are mostly those who invested in their front page and will also spend for their
advertising and yeah their players.
and also most of those who have good UI are those casino that up to now operating and even upgrading
their site year after year.

In my opinion, the casinos which have the best User interface are Stake and Neodice, (though I have hot heard about Neodice for a while so I don't know whether they are as active as they used to be). Stake's minimalistic interface makes it easy to use for long hours without tiring the sight of gamblers and that is exactly what one is supposed to expect from a webpage which wants to have people hooked to their games as long as possible. Neodice was more about their vaporwave/futuristic style and while it appealed to me, it does not necessarily appeal to all of gamblers out there.

Among casinos which need to improve their interface, I believe FreeBitcoin would be the biggest one which comes to mind who has not touched much it's UI (as far as I recall). Last time I checked it felt like I was visiting a webpage from the early 2010s. Besides of it, I don't think there is much else to say from my part...

We all have our own preference if we are talking about UI. There's no one size fits all on UI. Personally I like a simple and straight forward on casino, having no too many pages and bustabit is the first gambling site that I can think of. It's easier to ctrl+f on a casino that has few pages to be honest.

I don't expect much on sports book design since it involves a lot of text and numbers on their UI but I think what really matters most is how easy can users familiarize a sportsbook design. How progressive can customer on using the sportsbook over the time.